GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Can we get a basic fucking English test as part of the GFY sign up process? (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=694622)

jimthefiend 01-10-2007 09:26 AM

Can we get a basic fucking English test as part of the GFY sign up process?
 
Thanks, appreciate it.

munki 01-10-2007 09:29 AM

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh

jimthefiend 01-10-2007 09:30 AM

Ban anyone who can't pass this:


http://www.splashesfromtheriver.com/grammar_test.htm

WarChild 01-10-2007 09:30 AM

NO fucking doubt. Sig whores who can't even speak fucking English should just be killed.

I mean honestly, I don't mind reading the bullshit + postcount nonsense, but I shouldn't need a fucking Babble fish to dechiper it.

mikeyddddd 01-10-2007 09:37 AM

GFY would die without the illiterate.

alrem 01-10-2007 02:00 PM

that's rude, :winkwink:

not everybody were using english as a first language. Besides, nobody forces anybody to give attention on a specific post. If you can't understand it, ignore it :thumbsup

daisyswank 01-10-2007 02:12 PM

That can be really annoying

Vader 01-10-2007 02:27 PM

Go Jimmy Go ...

jayeff 01-10-2007 03:03 PM

How about a test to see who can complete a sentence without using at least one totally irrelevant and utterly unimaginative profanity?

OzMan 01-10-2007 03:12 PM

yes I really is hoping to going there one days.. looking a really good :thumbsup :thumbsup

itto 01-10-2007 03:48 PM

please not take test of english.

_Richard_ 01-10-2007 03:54 PM

language over money?

R

Theo 01-10-2007 04:05 PM

It appears that the theory of syntactic features developed earlier cannot be arbitrary in a corpus of utterance tokens upon which conformity has been defined by the paired utterance test. A consequence of the approach just outlined is that the notion of level of grammaticalness delimits the strong generative capacity of the theory. I suggested that these results would follow from the assumption that a descriptively adequate grammar is rather different from a parasitic gap construction. Clearly, the systematic use of complex symbols raises serious doubts about the levels of acceptability from fairly high to virtual gibberish. On our assumptions, the appearance of parasitic gaps in domains relatively inaccessible to ordinary extraction is not to be considered in determining a general convention regarding the forms of the grammar.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:23 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123