TampaToker
 

Respond please.

http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showthread.php?t=689894

I'm just being nosy. Carry on.

there is more too i am sure you can figure those out

http://img129.imageshack.us/img129/904/sexbg6.jpg

If you are pointing out meta tags that are used by some webmasters what is your point?

Your search results are returning descriptions for cp stuff you ok with that?. Like i said before there is alot more as well but i wont post them. You need to go back and look thru the results that are being shown:2 cents:

I use filters that filter our illegal sites, which includes child porn. If an illegal site slips past my filters and if someone runs across that site I suppose that site will be reported. I am not the porn police and I am not responsible for the meta tags that some webmasters choose to use but it seems you want me to be.

Is that what you want me to do?

You still here waffling on about the same site you were working on last year?

You are responsible for all content on your site - including linkage. It's irrelevant what you claim to be "not responsible" for - you are responsible for your site in total.

Look idiot you came on here asking about what we see. You are resposible for whats on your site. Stop acting like you some big ass search engine company.I pointed it out but you don't care so i will just foward what i seen to the proper people. Thread closed..........

Asswipe provide me with a link to the law that states I am legally responsible for the meta tags used by other webmasters. If you can do that I will use more filters and rebuild the databases.

You could use 2 or 3 of the 15 seconds the search takes and put a filter in there.

Do as you choose to do. If I am legally responsible for the meta tags that other webmasters use on their sites, then I may be culpable.

Tip... take your stupid ignorant mouth and kiss your ass.

You are responsible for any websites you create and all content on them - period.

You are no different from any other webmaster/publisher - live with it.

Yes. I can filter out the word young, but that will eliminate alot of sites that use the word young in their meta tags when that are not referring to young girls, or young teens. I don't think there is a law against webmasters using the word young in their meta tags, but maybe I am wrong.

I am legally responsible for my site, but you have not provided me with the law that states I am legally responsible for the meta tags used by other webmasters on their sites. So is this just more of your bullshit asswipe?

Who cares about your claimed meta tags??? I don't care about your laws. I don't use content which can possibly suggest CP and do that without a need for any laws - it's common sense.

I'll repeat - you are responsible for your websites and content. That means *anything* you care to publish, whether this of your own orgination or ripped from elsewhere.

Don't waste my time - or the time of others, till you get your act together.

then why not filter the phrase " young teens" :2 cents:

It seems to me that you are the one that is deciding how to spend your time asswipe.

An eighteen year old teen is a young teen and is a legal teen so if I filter "young teens" that will probably eliminate hundreds if not thousands of teen sites and galleries, which would pretty much make me the porn police, would it not?

Gawd :1orglaugh :1orglaugh Shut the fuck up and behave you stupid old ass.

Learn something about this business or piss off elsewhere - you have been told what is needed - either do it or shut the fuck up. It's not a friggin discussion topic.

Asswipe, please feel free to post elsewhere. I do not want you to waste your time. By now, you hear.

You have to be fucking kiddin me. I was following you to some extent there, the word "young" could block some legit sites, but saying the word "young teen" is ok because 18 teen year-old girls are " young teens" is just stupid.

Here is how it works, Teens are 13 - 19.

Young teens would be the ones closer to 13, like 13,14,15, etc.. However anything under 18 is illegal, so "young teens" would never be describing legal content.

I am sure you know this though.

I have checked several of the sites that have "young teens" in their meta tags as listed on my search engines and I have yet to see any content that appears to be illegal so, yes, apparently some webmasters choose to use in their meta tags "young teens" to described what appears to be legal content and even content that clearly are not even teens.

I do not believe that meta tags are illegal, but content can be illegal, maybe I am wrong. I have an attorney friend researching the matter. Thus far no one on the board has provided a link to a law that indicates meta tags can be illegal, and/or that I am legally responsible for other webmasters use of meta tags. I have filters that are supposed to filter out illegal sites, such as child porn, scat, rape, torture, etc.

Still here? Na.. idiots are the entertainment on GFY - and you are so entertaining :winkwink:

Will is 100% correct and I'm also sure you know a "young teen" is not an 18 year old. Would hate to get your opinion on "old teens" - or any other subject.

Just cannot help yourself can you asswipe?

:uhoh

My, my... you still bumping your stupid threads? I'm fine thanks - just amused at your stupidity - considering you are allegedly an adult. Is the little boy needing attention from Momma?? :pimp