NEWS.COM: Man indicted over child porn was taking pictures of CLOTHED girls
 

NEWS.COM: Man indicted over child porn was taking pictures of CLOTHED girls

...
In a federal indictment announced this week, the U.S. Department of Justice accused Pierson, 43, of being a child pornographer--even though even prosecutors acknowledge there's no evidence he has ever taken a single photograph of an unclothed minor.
...

http://news.com.com/Federal+case+may...3-6139524.html
++++++++++

This shit is getting out of hand!

sounds like any other portfolio company for models

It doesn't matter, nude or not. If they dwell on the genetalia or beasts of the model, zoom, etc, or sell / resell the images using sex or sexual material to move them, well...

It all comes to intent.

that's fucked

Right Rawlex. It also depends on the nature of the shots.

hmm wierd, guess would have to hear more details about it.

geezus....

I wonder if he was using cameras/camcorders purchased from walmart... :1orglaugh

http://img247.imageshack.us/img247/9...lmartccol9.jpg

I don't know about this case but some of that child modeling I've seen online makes me cringe and sends chills down my spine.

was probably shooting for American Apparel.

agreed, i've seen this whole issue brought up many times on many forums, and some of the content i've seen is pretty questionable. like seriously 12 year old girls have no business modeling lace thongs and sheer stockings, etc. who the hell would a girl who isn't even in her teens legitimately be modelling skimpy lingerie for? child "model" sites are nothing more than softcore porn for pedophiles. these girls parents make me sick for letting this sort of thing fly...