Chatting them up on MySpace - A new approach.
 

I figured it was a time for a change. While the subtly sexual flirtation that is 87.9% effective I thought it was time for a change. Starting from the first email straight until the last (4-5 on average so far) I would dazzle them not with sex talk but rather complex sentences that are one phrase away for being run-on and sprinkling a heavy load of different types of punctuation to separate each 50 word sentence. The mechanics I've employed are literarily legal though stretched to the max (1).

TAKE NOTE: Keeping a single sentence as on contiguous thought tied together with creative pauses and conjunctions will make your writing appear to be intelligent without the use of a single esoteric word. The other advantage this style holds is that the end result will generally contain 300-500% more words which should make this style of writing popular among university students.

And that's it. Now to turn this drab bullshit into panty remover (2) you simply add the word pussy no more than once ever other sentence and complimenting her non-sexual features as much as you like.

(1) Any similarity that exists between the stated technique and any real world act that's actually successfull is strictly coincidence. All inquiries as to the actual effectiveness are to be directed to the author of the technique; the author (hereby referred to as The Sultan) will be available to answer any and all questions. The Sultan's current non-female sleeping arrangement is in no way to be related to the success of The Sultan's MySpace scoring technique.

(2) Panty remover is defined in this treatise as being any technique that elicits the reciprocal use of the word pussy from your subject. Any actual removal of panties is strickly coincidental and in no way was meant to reflect a real event.

ADDENDUM: All numbers used in the previous section were meant for illustration purposes only and should only be look upon as an average. 3-4 emails was the average for the author and you may in fact be able to close the study much more quickly and recieve replies that consist of actual words instead of three lines containing 3 structurally incorrect acronyms. An example of an "average" reply is illustrated in Figure 1-1.


Figure 1-1 - Standard reply received after electronic message. "The Technique"

lol
wtf?
haha

Crap I saw there was one response but I forgot I had added another one. This wasn't intended to be a shameless bump of my own thread that has elicited zero interest :(

</end pathetic attempt at a guild trip>

P.S. I'm aware that I made a closing tag without an opening tag but it was intentional; if I put the opening tag in my attempt at a guilt trip to force a quick smiley response from a circa June 2006 green poster or squishypimp was worth invalidating the code.

Oh no my poor little thread don't worry I'll put you back up.

interesting... :)

Not really it failed :(

hey mon
i think we need a example setence as how to turn writing into intellegent looking to university babes...

How about if you start with using spell check and leave the dry witted humor to the funny people?