GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Commision Junction for Adult Networks? (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=682491)

xxxvertising 12-01-2006 01:04 AM

Commision Junction for Adult Networks?
 
Hey Dudes

Are there any Affiliate Network out there like Commision Junction etc?

Thankx.

WiredGuy 12-01-2006 01:05 AM

Dollars.com was the only one I knew of before they folded their operations.
WG

xxxvertising 12-01-2006 01:11 AM

Any Network still out there then?
 
Any Network still out there then?

VIPimp 12-01-2006 01:17 AM

xpays.com ?

xxxvertising 12-01-2006 01:24 AM

was lookiing for something more cj.com like :-)

rounders 12-01-2006 01:27 AM

Not that I know off...

xxxvertising 12-01-2006 01:34 AM

Woudn't programs be intersted in be able to add themselves to a network like CJ is, to reach more affiliate?

VIPimp 12-01-2006 01:36 AM

Well that is kind of what xpays offers... they have sites from other programs in there as well as their own.

xxxvertising 12-01-2006 01:42 AM

Ahh Okey :-) I just thought of something more Publisher/Advertiser like .-)

CyberHustler 12-01-2006 01:44 AM

this thread is the gayish / faggotish type .-)

Sarah_Jayne 12-01-2006 03:53 AM

in a way CCBill is sort of like that with being able to merge accounts

Sarah_Jayne 12-01-2006 03:55 AM

in a way CCBill is sort of like that with being able to merge accounts

xxxvertising 12-01-2006 05:58 AM

East-Coas-t-Bump :-)

studiocritic 12-01-2006 06:14 AM

there really isn't anything.. like sarah said, ccbill is closest.. but it's not even close to what CJ offers in reality

xxxvertising 12-01-2006 06:53 AM

Would you use it?
 
Would you guys use it if something like that existed?

Regards

Christoph

studiocritic 12-01-2006 08:17 AM

heh, affiliates would LOVE the check consolidation.

someone who comes out with an adult affiliate network that has cascading processors and all the functionality of CJ is going to make a killing.

Christoph: we're extremely well versed in consulting for affiliate networks and what it takes to make them successful.. if this is a project you're interested in pursuing shoot me an icq and let's talk.

xxxvertising 12-01-2006 08:49 AM

West-Coast
 
West-Coast Bump :-) would like to know what you guys think .-)

Cheers

Christoph

FreeHugeMovies 12-01-2006 09:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xxxvertising (Post 11428005)
Would you guys use it if something like that existed?

Regards

Christoph

Nope, and trust me it wouldn't work. Besides I think XPays owns this sub affiliate patent or some shit like that.

WiredGuy 12-01-2006 09:03 AM

I wouldn't want it for the sole reason that I want the highest payout possible. Having the sponsor paying a management fee to an aggregator would hurt my bottom line that I would keep working directly with sponsors to keep the best payouts possible. The cost of a consolidated check isn't worth losing commissions in my opinion.
WG

Wizzo 12-01-2006 09:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WiredGuy (Post 11428809)
I wouldn't want it for the sole reason that I want the highest payout possible. Having the sponsor paying a management fee to an aggregator would hurt my bottom line that I would keep working directly with sponsors to keep the best payouts possible. The cost of a consolidated check isn't worth losing commissions in my opinion.
WG

Couldn't agree more! :pimp

Sensual_Sam 12-01-2006 09:50 AM

I'd be interested in this information also.

Z 12-01-2006 10:51 AM

Dollars.com was one hell of an idea...damn shame it never happened.

fabianb 12-02-2006 04:43 AM

j.,
 
WG, A CJ network would not lower your payouts, it would increase your payouts.
Adult affiliate programs are based on 1998 technology and thinking.
A smart adult CJ network would detect your unproductive links and switch to higher production sites/products.

Dollars.com concept was good, only downside was that ALL information was open and mayor programs simply don't want to share that info.

My 2 cnts.


Missed Islandgathering? See you in Panama : panamasummit.com

Manowar 12-02-2006 04:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sarah_webinc (Post 11427262)
in a way CCBill is sort of like that with being able to merge accounts

true that

studiocritic 12-02-2006 04:57 AM

well.. WG does have a point, CJ takes between 25-30% of what a merchant pays their affiliate.

so if a merchant wants to pay $27 PPS, they have to pay an additional $9 to CJ.. $9 that could be going into your pocket.

this is why a lot of us make side deals with their big CJ sponsors

stef_girls18 12-02-2006 05:36 AM

some interesting ideas in this thread, but don't think it would work

fabianb 12-02-2006 06:00 AM

..
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by studiocritic (Post 11436080)
well.. WG does have a point, CJ takes between 25-30% of what a merchant pays their affiliate.

so if a merchant wants to pay $27 PPS, they have to pay an additional $9 to CJ.. $9 that could be going into your pocket.

this is why a lot of us make side deals with their big CJ sponsors

--

A smart operator would demand from CJ adult sponsors that payouts would be equal as a minimum. Profit margins for adult sponsors are higher then margins for mainstream sponsors.

A real smart operator would look around and find 10-20 adult products that sell well and built them himself and offer through a cj adult network.

Affiliates are lazy, most of them don't even bother to sign up for a new program. Even if an established program opens a new program it's a pain in the butt for operators to get affiliates to signup. One CJ adult platform would solve that problem..

I can't see the advantage of having to track 3 accounts on 3 programs (owned by the same person/company) if I want to sell dating / adult and vod traffic.

fabianb 12-02-2006 06:08 AM

./
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by sarah_webinc (Post 11427262)
in a way CCBill is sort of like that with being able to merge accounts

Ccbill is mostly rev. share based.
Paycom is mostly PPS based.

Anyone with high volume traffic hedges. x% to rev share, y% to pps, not one smart person would bet all his income on 100% rev share.
(why would I rely on a paysite operator to maintain it's retention?)

Merging an account doesn't mean that you actively can manage links or allow an affiliate to default traffic to e.g. paycom as primairy and ccbill as secondairy.
E.g. I know that from a certain traffic pool I happen to have a lot of traffic not originating in the US. I find a nice site that happens to process with CCbill. It would be a total waste for me to send any traffic to that site, while if they would process on paycom I would get 'some' signups with this traffic.
(and visa versa for other traffic).

->


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:39 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123