oprano finally dead?
 

just went to look for first time in ages got this:

http://files.smutput.com/20061126/iexc_oprano.jpg

Finally? LOL

Its been dead for months, ever since that asshat Gonzo took it over.

Regards,

Lee

At least it wasn't dead when you stole the email database and spammed everyone with your non-compliant content, eh Lee? :1orglaugh

owned lol

Or when you were denying your involvement in your pedo ventures :2 cents:

Regards,

Lee

Damn they were around forever RIP

never heard of them till now

It says they are doing a version upgrade for me.

this thread is getting dirty

WTF are you talking about, Lee? Explain and explain fast. From my understanding, saying someone's involved in pedo w/o proof gets you banned. Of course, things you've said to me before should have gotten you banned too.

You're a lying, stealing piece of shit. Please feel free to show the board my involvement in pedo ventures. I'll give you 24 hours to dig it up before I contact Eric.

wow we might need a drama llama in here

they are upgrading not going anywhere

My patience isn't what it used to be. I didn't ask for him to get banned (though many others did) when he posted pictures of a man hanging himself in reference to my son's death, but this was the icing on the cake. I've sent an email to Eric. He was banned long before I even knew the bastard so it's not like he doesn't already carry a history of inappropriate board behavior.

I would give him 24 seconds

Actually, I didn't wait :winkwink: Hopefully Eric will take this seriously.

that oprano guy used to spam this board a lot

damn tsk tsk....drama!

Good move, No need for bullshit like that to stand even 24 seconds.

Basic Rules of GFY

3. Anything goes, except do not post people's personal information, or attack people personally, stick to the issues. Also don't post links to illegal sites. And WHOIS information is public info, it is not considered personal information. So don't bitch at us if you put your home address as your personal info on WHOIS. Calling someone a Pedo, Refferring to them as a Pedo, post Pedo links, and Death Threats are now grounds for immediate banning.

And GOODBYE! :2 cents:

Regards,

TexasDreams

http://lightsout.onestop.net/llama.jpg

Drama Llama was late :)

I believe he does.




Bye Lee. (again)

Idiot.

oprano is a joke.

Please for the love of god never unban this asshat.

The mighty ban hammer :thumbsup !!

Never knew them eversince..

Life is good. I corrupt a database and that lying thief Lee gets banned for being a jack ass.

Exactly, I have no idea why he gets unbanned.

I generally steer clear of drama stuff, because a lot of it I don't know the history of, and partly because I represent a company.

But my opinion is that he should have never been let back on the board after the picture he posted to Peaches awhile back.

It's all fun and games, and all that shit, but some lines you just do not cross.

:2 cents:

so oprano is ok but lee is done!

I tried to read Oprano a couple times to see if it was worth joining. Couldn't read shit without joining so fuck that.

Here's what I love about TD and his bannings... As much as Lee is an ass, he didn't call Peaches a Pedo or refer to Peaches as a pedo.. thus, Lee didn't break any rules that should lead to getting him banned. jimthefiend however HAS broken the rules and yet he gets to stay. Another bright decision by TD.

Actually, European Lee did accuse Peaches of Pedo sites.

Justifiable.

Only if you assume the term "venture" means sites and that "involvement" means Peaches was "in charge". For all we know it could have been photography for some catalog that featured kids in artistic scenes. Or it could have been a 14 year old non-nude site. Who the hell knows. And since Lee's banned, now we never will and will never be able to judge for ourselves if in fact what Peaches may or may not have been involved with is questionable.

But that doesn't matter.. the rules, as defined, were still not broken.

did he fuck you in the pooper or why are you trying to defend that piece of scum? he should have been never unbanned in the first place :2 cents:

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh Did you actually read anything or do you have shit for brains? Did you miss the part where I said he was an ass?? Or maybe you're not able to use those gray cells you have to look objectively at things.

I don't care one way or the other whether he's banned or not. I DO want the mods to ban people fairly, especially those that CLEARLY break the rules. And because they don't, I'll raise the issue every fucking time regardless of who gets banned. I've said the exact same thing about people even I can't stand that have gotten banned for NOT breaking the rules.

I also want to know what's behind what he said. For all I know Peaches could be scum as well and should be chased out of here.

results for: venture
View results from: Dictionary | Thesaurus | Encyclopedia | the Web

Dictionary.com Unabridged (v 1.0.1) - Cite This Source
ven‧ture  /ˈvɛntʃər/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[ven-cher] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation noun, verb, -tured, -tur‧ing, adjective

?noun 1. an undertaking involving uncertainty as to the outcome, esp. a risky or dangerous one: a mountain-climbing venture.

2. a business enterprise or speculation in which something is risked in the hope of profit; a commercial or other speculation.

Thank you, TD :)

No, not dead. And looks like lee won't be here much/any longer.

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :pimp

the ban hammer has come!

Honestly I'm trying to figure out WTF he's talking about with "pedo ventures". First time I've EVER heard that in reference to me in the 10 years I've been online in this biz. If anything, exposing others has been my biggest "problem", lol :)

I think he meant to say pug-o ventures

:1orglaugh

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

Let me stress that Meg and Ferdinand are over 18 - in dog years :)

Somtimes I don't know whether you're truly stupid or just act that way to create an argument in order to get your postcount up...

Let me spell it out for you..

Here are the rules...

1. Calling someone a Pedo
Did he do that?? No.

2. Refferring to them as a Pedo
Did he do that?? No.

3. post Pedo links
Did he do that?? No.

He said that Peaches was involved in "something" related to Pedos. He DID NOT say Peaches WAS a Pedo. What he said was that Peaches was involved with something to do with Pedos. For example. Running a site that catered to the sickos would be "involvement in a pedo venture". Supplying hosting to Pedos would be "involvement in a pedo venture". I would even go so far as to say that providing CC processing where 90% of the sites are "pedo" related would be "involvement in a pedo venture". But NONE of those would even mean that the PERSON was a pedo. And the rules ONLY apply to calling someone or referring to someone as a Pedo.

But hey. If you can clearly spell out to me which pedo rule was broken, I'll happily stop talking about it. But you can't and so all you can do is talk out your ass.

Having said all that, I would say that Lee did make a serious accusation, and the rules DO say you have to provide proof or you could be banned. He wasn't given the chance to post proof. If it was me, I would much rather he be given the chance so that it's shown he was just making a false accusation and then get banned.

As I said, my whole issue with this is how the mods don't adhere to the rules and so some people float around breaking the rules and not getting banned whereas others get banned at the drop of a hat. If you're going to bother having rules then fucking enforce them properly.

The reality is that few people like Lee and so are happy he's banned regardless of whether he broke the rules or not. But those same people would cry like little babies if it happened to them.

Honestly I thought you were just playing Devil's Advocate, but apparently you're serious.

If I was "defending my pedo ventures", that clearly implies that I have pedo ventures. Everyone else here sees that.

There was no reason to wait for "proof". There isn't any. I've been accused of a LOT of things in 10 years. Being involved in "pedo ventures" has NEVER been one of them - on this board, any other board, in person, on ICQ, ever. So obviously I never had an opportunity to defend them, as Lee stated.

And as I said before, he should have been banned months ago. Actually he shouldn't have ever been unbanned - the only reason he unbanned was because he kissed Juicy. Very businesslike, lol.

I am sure the owners and mods are allowed their own judgment calls. That was clearly suggesting she was involved with pedo stuff which in this industry mine aswell mean you are a pedo. That is clearly rubbish and anyone who knows Peaches and her recent 'fights' knows that too.

I have to ask, is English your native language because if it is you are in serious trouble. If not, I will excuse your inability to comprehend.

50 bans and dramas hehe