GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Google Images sends 1 person every 2 seconds to me. (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=679933)

SmokeyTheBear 11-22-2006 06:05 PM

Google Images sends 1 person every 2 seconds to me.
 
There has to be something that i can sell these shmoes..

Give me some ideas..

I have tried all sites type passes , quite a few types of porn sites, a few dating sites , a cam site . google adsense and a few others but nothing seems to sell very well.. ( i.e. max $100 avg p/day )

SmokeyTheBear 11-22-2006 06:06 PM

p.s. im still going through a list of sites people suggested in my last thread trying them out one per day

2HousePlague 11-22-2006 06:07 PM

The more I flirt and primp for Google, the more Yahoo craves my cock. Weird.

2hp

devilspost 11-22-2006 06:08 PM

did you try guba? http://www.makemoneywithporn.com/sponsors.php?goto=guba

polish_aristocrat 11-22-2006 06:08 PM

Quote:

Google Images sends 1 person every 2 seconds to me.
too lazy to calculate how much that's per day, but sounds good :thumbsup

ListYourPorn 11-22-2006 06:14 PM

they want pictures, send them to a gallery made with this system http://www.payasyouclick.com/ - let them have a few images then charge em per image after that.

Basically exactly what they are looking, pictures :)

WiredGuy 11-22-2006 06:19 PM

I was thinking adsense would probably be best since these are mostly clickers and not buyers.
WG

Mr Pheer 11-22-2006 06:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by polish_aristocrat (Post 11373679)
too lazy to calculate how much that's per day, but sounds good :thumbsup

43,200 .

SmokeyTheBear 11-22-2006 06:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ListYourPorn (Post 11373706)
they want pictures, send them to a gallery made with this system http://www.payasyouclick.com/ - let them have a few images then charge em per image after that.

Basically exactly what they are looking, pictures :)

i have seen a few of these types of systems, it seems a bit complicated to get started , like you need to do some preselling first perhaps to get the person interested.. because the search terms are rather unique i'm not sure this will work unless i do alot of work filtering the traffic first, but its worth a shot. :thumbsup

SmokeyTheBear 11-22-2006 06:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WiredGuy (Post 11373735)
I was thinking adsense would probably be best since these are mostly clickers and not buyers.
WG

:thumbsup . i tried that for a bit but im not the best at integrating their ads, i have seen some clever ones. i'm working on a better system..

p.s. for those wondering adsense was pulling about $30 a day for about %70 of the traffic ( around 30k a day in trffic )

Martin3 11-22-2006 06:47 PM

I've tried it with adbrite ads before. Had the same thought, they like to click and not buy, but it didn't work out that great. Wasn't anywere near as much traffic as you're talking about though, about 1500-2000/day.

I'm sure proper layout and intergration is key to making it work. With the amount of traffic you're talking about it might not hurt to consult with people more knowledgeable that area.

baddog 11-22-2006 06:49 PM

That guy should try rebooting his modem or something. I would be pissed.

RawAlex 11-22-2006 06:52 PM

Considered Zango or that bullshit with the "need a codec to watch"? I hear they pay real good.

tenderobject 11-22-2006 06:54 PM

i want to know whats the best for google images as well. let us know what you came up smokey if you like to share :)

GreedyFridge 11-22-2006 06:55 PM

Zango is real good on that type of traffic

SmokeyTheBear 11-22-2006 07:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog (Post 11373907)
That guy should try rebooting his modem or something. I would be pissed.

heh i should have mentioned "uniques"

sample from one server log


22nd 06:54:04 PM - images.google.com - - Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.1) Gecko/20060114 Firefox/1.5.0.1

22nd 06:54:06 PM - images.google.com.mx - - Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; FunWebProducts; .NET CLR 2.0.50727)

22nd 06:54:10 PM - images.google.es - - Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1)

22nd 06:54:19 PM - images.google.co.uk - - Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1)

22nd 06:54:23 PM - images.google.com.pe - - Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1)

22nd 06:54:30 PM - images.google.co.uk - - Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1)

22nd 06:54:30 PM - images.google.com - - Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727)

22nd 06:54:31 PM - images.google.ca - - Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322)

22nd 06:54:32 PM - images.google.fr - - Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; InfoPath.1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727)

22nd 06:54:35 PM - images.google.com - - Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.8) Gecko/20061025 Firefox/1.5.0.8

22nd 06:54:38 PM - images.google.com - - Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.0; .NET CLR 1.1.4322)

22nd 06:54:40 PM - images.google.com.mx - - Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; FunWebProducts; .NET CLR 2.0.50727)

22nd 06:54:41 PM - images.google.com - - Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.8) Gecko/20061025 Firefox/1.5.0.8

22nd 06:54:42 PM - images.google.com - - Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727)

22nd 06:54:43 PM - images.google.com - - Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.8) Gecko/20061025 Firefox/1.5.0.8

22nd 06:54:43 PM - images.google.fr - - Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; InfoPath.1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727)

22nd 06:54:53 PM - images.google.co.uk - - Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.8.1) Gecko/20061010 Firefox/2.0

22nd 06:54:58 PM - images.google.co.uk - - Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.8.1) Gecko/20061010 Firefox/2.0

22nd 06:54:59 PM - images.google.com - - Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; pt-BR; rv:1.8.1) Gecko/20061010 Firefox/2.0

22nd 06:55:06 PM - images.google.com - - Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1)

DamageX 11-22-2006 07:57 PM

Smokey, ever considered sending them to a fake TGP that lists galleries where you get paid for raw clicks? Like Choker's system, or something of the like?

Waveu6410 11-22-2006 08:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DamageX (Post 11374183)
Smokey, ever considered sending them to a fake TGP that lists galleries where you get paid for raw clicks? Like Choker's system, or something of the like?

Now that's something new to me. I might give it a try. :thumbsup

Thanks!

DamageX 11-22-2006 08:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Waveu6410 (Post 11374199)
Now that's something new to me. I might give it a try. :thumbsup

Thanks!

Hit me up if you need help.

DaddyHalbucks 11-22-2006 08:10 PM

That is really sweet.

Try using a sponsor like one of these:

http://www.realitycash.com

http://www.trafficcashgold.com

http://www.sapphiccash.com

:thumbsup

Nicky 11-22-2006 08:18 PM

Well id have a hard time thinking you wouldnt make a couple of sales aday sending 42k uniques to adultalchemy every day, $35 per free sign rocks. If not id accually reccomend you to feed a TGP or MGP of your ownb with that traffic, should be able to bring you above 100k stable daily very fast with a good thumbs and trading script, after that you sell partner accounts, haha :winkwink:

baddog 11-22-2006 08:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SmokeyTheBear (Post 11374178)
heh i should have mentioned "uniques"

sample from one server log


22nd 06:54:04 PM - images.google.com - - Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.1) Gecko/20060114 Firefox/1.5.0.1

22nd 06:54:06 PM - images.google.com.mx - - Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; FunWebProducts; .NET CLR 2.0.50727)

22nd 06:54:10 PM - images.google.es - - Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1)

22nd 06:54:19 PM - images.google.co.uk - - Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1)

22nd 06:54:23 PM - images.google.com.pe - - Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1)

22nd 06:54:30 PM - images.google.co.uk - - Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1)

22nd 06:54:30 PM - images.google.com - - Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727)

22nd 06:54:31 PM - images.google.ca - - Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322)

22nd 06:54:32 PM - images.google.fr - - Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; InfoPath.1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727)

22nd 06:54:35 PM - images.google.com - - Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.8) Gecko/20061025 Firefox/1.5.0.8

22nd 06:54:38 PM - images.google.com - - Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.0; .NET CLR 1.1.4322)

22nd 06:54:40 PM - images.google.com.mx - - Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; FunWebProducts; .NET CLR 2.0.50727)

22nd 06:54:41 PM - images.google.com - - Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.8) Gecko/20061025 Firefox/1.5.0.8

22nd 06:54:42 PM - images.google.com - - Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727)

22nd 06:54:43 PM - images.google.com - - Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.8) Gecko/20061025 Firefox/1.5.0.8

22nd 06:54:43 PM - images.google.fr - - Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; InfoPath.1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727)

22nd 06:54:53 PM - images.google.co.uk - - Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.8.1) Gecko/20061010 Firefox/2.0

22nd 06:54:58 PM - images.google.co.uk - - Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.8.1) Gecko/20061010 Firefox/2.0

22nd 06:54:59 PM - images.google.com - - Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; pt-BR; rv:1.8.1) Gecko/20061010 Firefox/2.0

22nd 06:55:06 PM - images.google.com - - Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1)


Ah, that makes a huge difference for sure.

madawgz 11-22-2006 08:21 PM

have you tried pushing nichepay yet? :)

fr0gman 11-22-2006 08:25 PM

I have a sure fire way to convert that image traffic to $$... I have been doing it for a few months and it is paying out great. ICQ for details

BV 11-22-2006 08:29 PM

it helps to bust them out of the frame

SmokeyTheBear 11-22-2006 08:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BV (Post 11374338)
it helps to bust them out of the frame

heh thats done right away :thumbsup

Tempest 11-22-2006 08:37 PM

Is the traffic niche specific?

It seems like they might be price sensitive.. Why not try some of the free membership options from CE Cash.

rounders 11-22-2006 09:23 PM

icq me for details for some ideas

sandman! 11-22-2006 09:28 PM

how about teaching me now to get 40k a day in google image traffic ?

Im willing to pay :)

tehHinjew 11-22-2006 09:33 PM

honestly
http://wetrack.it/pureghr15/a/420
20$ a sale
and its sooooooooooo easy to sell
because its free!!!

interracialtoons 11-22-2006 09:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SmokeyTheBear (Post 11373662)
There has to be something that i can sell these shmoes..

Give me some ideas..

I have tried all sites type passes , quite a few types of porn sites, a few dating sites , a cam site . google adsense and a few others but nothing seems to sell very well.. ( i.e. max $100 avg p/day )


Good luck. The first hit from google is in a frame and the second hit is to the image file on your server. The surfer is not really looking at your page.

I got the same thing going on too. It looks great but amounts to nothing.

BV 11-22-2006 09:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sandman! (Post 11374652)
how about teaching me now to get 40k a day in google image traffic ?

Im willing to pay :)

submit lots of galleries to tgps and name your images with keywords, over time you also can have lots of image traffic.

BV 11-22-2006 09:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by interracialtoons (Post 11374673)
Good luck. The first hit from google is in a frame and the second hit is to the image file on your server. The surfer is not really looking at your page.

I got the same thing going on too. It looks great but amounts to nothing.


This is why you bust them out of the frame as we discussed a few posts up.

marketsmart 11-22-2006 09:40 PM

thats alot of traffic from google :thumbsup

jacklaidlaw 11-22-2006 09:47 PM

yeah you really need to get rid of the frame to make $$

uno 11-22-2006 09:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SmokeyTheBear (Post 11373779)
:thumbsup . i tried that for a bit but im not the best at integrating their ads, i have seen some clever ones. i'm working on a better system..

p.s. for those wondering adsense was pulling about $30 a day for about %70 of the traffic ( around 30k a day in trffic )

Only $30/day w/ adsense on 30k traffic?

uno 11-22-2006 09:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SmokeyTheBear (Post 11374349)
heh thats done right away :thumbsup

It's what I do, amongst other things. :winkwink:

SmokeyTheBear 11-22-2006 10:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tempest (Post 11374379)
Is the traffic niche specific?

It seems like they might be price sensitive.. Why not try some of the free membership options from CE Cash.

i have been trying different programs people suggest on a 1-2 day try , today is cecash's turn ( since last night ) im doing the email program as test . i dont want to post stats from thes trials because i know the traffic is prettyu crappy and dont want to disuade people from using the programs i try but if you want to know the stats anyone can hit me up and ask

Someone above mentioned realitycash i tried them yesterday , very very low click through rate , not sure what the problem is , trying occash pornmultipass today as well . much better ctr

austinth 11-22-2006 10:39 PM

the adsense system is working well for me, but you're right you've really gotta work on ad integration. i've had good luck with a certain layout with a few sets of ads on the page, but everyones traffic is different.

warlock5 11-22-2006 11:37 PM

Are you trying to send all this traffic to one location? This should definately be niched.

Quick Buck 11-22-2006 11:43 PM

smokey... redirect them to a non porn domain and make a site that looks "an awful lot like google", get those searchers to do another search and make a ton of money from it... hell.. just use the google adsense for search, javascript the search box to be focused and put up a bogus error message like "the image could not be displayed, please search again" :)

SmokeyTheBear 11-22-2006 11:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by warlock5 (Post 11375259)
Are you trying to send all this traffic to one location? This should definately be niched.

yes and yes, the only problem is its across tons of different niche's so its alot of work to seperate into individual niche's ( approx 500-1000 keywords )

fr0gman 11-22-2006 11:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Quick Buck (Post 11375281)
smokey... redirect them to a non porn domain and make a site that looks "an awful lot like google", get those searchers to do another search and make a ton of money from it... hell.. just use the google adsense for search, javascript the search box to be focused and put up a bogus error message like "the image could not be displayed, please search again" :)

No offense but that is a TOTAL violation of Google TOS. You can't display any Adsense elements on an Error Page nor can you put a search box on a page alone, nor can you manipulate the search code....

I am thrilled that it works for you but please do not lead others astray.

There are lots of ways to make money from that traffic and still stay within the lines.

fr0gman 11-22-2006 11:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by austinth (Post 11375008)
the adsense system is working well for me, but you're right you've really gotta work on ad integration. i've had good luck with a certain layout with a few sets of ads on the page, but everyones traffic is different.

I have adsense templates that consistently produce in excess of 20% CTR.

SmokeyTheBear 11-22-2006 11:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Quick Buck (Post 11375281)
smokey... redirect them to a non porn domain and make a site that looks "an awful lot like google", get those searchers to do another search and make a ton of money from it... hell.. just use the google adsense for search, javascript the search box to be focused and put up a bogus error message like "the image could not be displayed, please search again" :)

hold on a sec im having a seizure trying to read your post..


ok i'm better now.. heh

thats kind of what i was doing but using my own search box instead of google's but i need to work on my ad integration first

leedsfan 11-22-2006 11:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Quick Buck (Post 11375281)
smokey... redirect them to a non porn domain and make a site that looks "an awful lot like google", get those searchers to do another search and make a ton of money from it... hell.. just use the google adsense for search, javascript the search box to be focused and put up a bogus error message like "the image could not be displayed, please search again" :)


and wait for the litigation....

fr0gman 11-22-2006 11:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by leedsfan (Post 11375309)
and wait for the litigation....

There would be no litigation. Google would just let you run it for a month and build up some nice revenue then pull the plug under the TOS and you would be left holding your weenie.

Oh and you will have to send me an ICQ message since mine if screwed up and I can't add new people.

High Plains Drifter 11-23-2006 12:04 AM

I notice a large percentage of your surfers are enjoying the services of smiley central.

emthree 11-23-2006 12:22 AM

I get alot of adult google img searches as well. Seems to be mostly freeloaders.
Do you use a framebreaker code? I really need one. I've been too lazy to look into it...

tenderobject 11-23-2006 12:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by emthree (Post 11375419)
I get alot of adult google img searches as well. Seems to be mostly freeloaders.
Do you use a framebreaker code? I really need one. I've been too lazy to look into it...

im looking for one as well!


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:13 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123