What would you do to Improve InteractiveV2? the revolutionary software
 

What would you do to Improve it?

Check it out on these hosted galleries

http://www.redrumps.com/fhg.php?id=1...in=vodb_skin_1

http://www.hosefest.com/pantie-hose/...sole=y&track=A

http://www.babyboomersluts.com/matur...sole=y&track=A

http://www.sologirlsnetwork.com/solo...sole=y&track=A

http://www.trickedamateurs.com/fhg.p...in=vodb_skin_1

its converting our new sites 1/50 easy.

What would you do to improve it

Roger, why do you need to use flash for the image selection? Wouldn't it be better if there was no flash?

what dont you like about it in Flash?

To answer your question I really dont know Why its in flash but I will ask my techs. Its all automated so that might be the reason. I know the video is in flash to make it more interactive and the screen clickable

Without flash you could make drag & drop available rather then just click on thumbnails.

Interface now is rather clumzy, mouse wheel scrolling does not work, length of clip does not change even though selection changes.

Loading clip takes forever, why not show the time left of buffering, or % completed?

Here is somethin. I am a relative noob to this whole thing but in my specific gallery the thumbs are 120x160, and the v2 specific links that you have on your site only put out a max thumbsize of 90x120.

Since there arent any pictures to scan for the comus auto thumb software, I am forced to enlarge the thumb which makes it look fuzzy. And not to mention that my comus doesn't want to resize them for some reason, I then had to dump the v2 galleries. Awesome software, but maybe if you could either include some pictures for every v2 link outside of your player, or make the thumbs larger that would be handy.

I am not sure if anybody else has issues like this, but thats my personal experience.

thanks for the great feedback.. this is what I like to see

We are working on the changes as we speak

Not sure why you think drag and drop is better... I always thought that the fewer steps that had to be done the better. By simply clicking they achieve the same exact thing as dragging and dropping to a target. Which one is harder?

We had the length and size showing after they clicked but in order to simplify it we made it a simple "Click Here >"

Also, when you click to play a video, It should go to a viewer screen that has the progress bar. Did you not see that? It's in green. Many thanks for the comments.

Not sure why you think drag and drop is better... I always thought that the fewer steps that had to be done the better. By simply clicking they achieve the same exact thing as dragging and dropping to a target. Which one is harder?

We had the length and size showing after they clicked but in order to simplify it we made it a simple "Click Here >"

Also, when you click to play a video, It should go to a viewer screen that has the progress bar. Did you not see that? It's in green. Many thanks for the comments.

Not sure why you think drag and drop is better... I always thought that the fewer steps that had to be done the better. By simply clicking they achieve the same exact thing as dragging and dropping to a target. Which one is harder?

We had the length and size showing after they clicked but in order to simplify it we made it a simple "Click Here >"

Also, when you click to play a video, It should go to a viewer screen that has the progress bar. Did you not see that? It's in green. Many thanks for the comments.

Not sure why you think drag and drop is better... I always thought that the fewer steps that had to be done the better. By simply clicking they achieve the same exact thing as dragging and dropping to a target. Which one is harder?

We had the length and size showing after they clicked but in order to simplify it we made it a simple "Click Here >"

Also, when you click to play a video, It should go to a viewer screen that has the progress bar. Did you not see that? It's in green. Many thanks for the comments.

one more time please :)