Why USA doesn't attack North Korea?
 

they attacked iraq for the same reason..and cant wait to attack iran again for the same reason...

they scared of getting their ASS kicked by the north koreans?

How old are you?

There is NO oil in North Korea!

because N. Korea has no oil....

Old enough to kick ur ass!:1orglaugh

because their eyes are differant.

Its very simple.

China, Russia, and South Korea do not want a war on that peninsula. South Korea would probably go along with it, or just allow it to happen, but China and Russia would oppose it and would both be willing to defend it. Its basically the same reason China does not want overly stiff sanctions on North Korea, the people would flood into China and cause total disaster.

Prob two and a half and hoping to go to kindergarten at age three :pimp

"Attack is scheduled on October 13, 2006 at exactly 11 hundred hour"

Because it would be as big a failure as attacking Iraq and Afghanistan.

Because China would get involved and Seoul, the rest of South Korea and Japan would suffer severe damage to their people and economy ...

I think because there is no oil there...

The us does not want this mass right now :)

They will attack .... Soon

because the us is still licking there wounds after the major fuck up in iraq

can't afford another war in both money and political power

then there is also the fact that korea actually have nukes and missles that are able to hit america

hmmmm, our enemies in both those countries are now so busy killing each other, they haven't had time to attack US soil.

If thats failure, I say lets fail some more!

An ICBM that can deliver only 2 Kilotons to the edge of Alaska?

Hiroshima was 15 KT and it really wasn't shit.

Tell that to the (approx) 140,000 people who died, I don't think it will be much of a comfort to them.

It won't be much of a comfort to any west coast city that gets hit because it turns out he has a better delivery system than previously known.

North Korea havings nukes isn't a concern, Kim Jong having nukes is. He's insane.

Korea has nothing the US wants :)

How hard is it for these organizations which orchestrated the single worst terrorist attack on US soil to get a singular guy to go shoot up a mall in the name of Allah? How about to go suicide bomb a Wal-Mart or a fast food restaurant? Why haven’t we seen these kinds of simple, albeit very effective in terms of fear, attacks been carried out?

I'll give you a hint: It's not because they are all "so busy killing each other".

china and oil

Mr. Romance

heads on!

Iraq didnt have nuclear weapon,so if NK will be attacked then they could return badly.

Who ever said we WOULD attack NK?

Main answer being though ... Civilian casualties in South Korea

You could be right. But that could simply be a coincidence. Terrorist attacks on our soil are not a daily occurence, were never close to a yearly or every third year occurance.

If you think we're safer now than before the war, that's cool. Some of us think we're less safe. Some of us even think we were never all that unsafe in the first place, even after september 11.

It's a matter of perspective. We've tallied more casualties in this war than we tailled on 9/11. Plus there are thousands more kids coming back without arms, legs, sight, hearing and worse every day. And because this is a war over ideology, it's never going to be possible to plant a flag and declare victory. American kids will continue to die over there at the same rate in perpetuity.

It also means that short of instituting a mandatory draft, our military resources will have a constant strain on manpower that can be purposed toward other conflicts that occur.

That's the reality. If you believe paying that price ensures america's safety, then you probably support the war. If you don't think it ensures america's safety, you don't.

no thanks.
we have all the kimchi we need.
thanks for asking anyway.

Would you get the bullet while in action on the ground, for "failing some more"? :winkwink: