GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   XBIZ News: FBI Violates FSC Injunction Covering Secondary Producers (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=664748)

Brooklywood 10-10-2006 04:27 PM

XBIZ News: FBI Violates FSC Injunction Covering Secondary Producers
 
Free Speech Coalition attorney Jeffrey Douglas, who also represents Chatsworth, Calif.-based Legend Video, said today?s FBI inspection of the company?s 2257 records was conducted in violation of an injunction issued in favor of the trade group?s secondary producer members by a U.S. District Court in Denver.

For more, read the story on XBIZ...

After Shock Media 10-10-2006 04:29 PM

uh oh spaghettios.

MaDalton 10-10-2006 04:29 PM

as if they'd care...

sicone 10-10-2006 04:29 PM

hmmm, this can make things very interesting

seeric 10-10-2006 04:32 PM

10 to 1 not a damn thing happens. :(

jact 10-10-2006 04:32 PM

Does the injunction still stand after the newest law passed, whatever the heck the # is? I can't keep up with all the new additions.

pocketkangaroo 10-10-2006 04:40 PM

This is one of those threads that the GFY republicans stay out of for some reason.

Xenophage 10-10-2006 04:41 PM

This might turn out to be very good for the industry

AsianDivaGirlsWebDude 10-10-2006 04:54 PM

The Attorney General probably gave the FBI permission to ignore the injunction in the name of Homeland Security.

If you don't defend this search, then you support terrorism, and hate freedom and liberty. :flagface

Shouldn't they be investigating child predators in Congress?

ADG Webmaster

crockett 10-10-2006 05:17 PM

More than likely the Attorney General is ignorant of their own damn law and that of the injunction. It is interesting that they will just ignore a US judge as far as the inspections go.

What ever happened about them re working this shit under that other law? What did the judge say about that? Seems to me the Attorney General was pretty much just ignoring what the judge has said in that matter to.

squishypimp 10-10-2006 05:19 PM

i hope the fbi gets thrashed for this.

vod 10-10-2006 05:27 PM

wow, interesting....

dissipate 10-10-2006 05:29 PM

This is going to be really interesting to see the outcome of

Dirty Dane 10-10-2006 05:42 PM

If they can ignore the constitution and supreme court about torture and civil rights, its quite likely they could ignore this too.

BoyAlley 10-10-2006 06:59 PM

Wow, I really feel sorry for secondary producers that aren't in compliance right now.

I wonder if it was a mix up (the feds didn't know they were fsc members?), or if they feel that the new 4472 statute supercedes the 2257 injunction?

Hrm, let's see.

Incorrectly cross referencing 2257 records = 5 years in prison per offense.

Violating a Federal Judge's injunction against inspecting those records = HRMMMMMM I WONDER

I'm willing to bet it involves the following:

Judge: Uhm. What you durrin?
Attorney General: Oops. Honest Mistake. Sorry.
Judge: Thanks for saying you're sorry. Don't do it again.
Attorney General: Mmk.

Sinstar 10-10-2006 07:03 PM

Wow, interesting stuff... Hope someone holds the FBI acountable.... LOL

lelahosting 10-10-2006 07:11 PM

why doesnt this surprise me?

RawAlex 10-10-2006 07:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BoyAlley (Post 11044638)
Wow, I really feel sorry for secondary producers that aren't in compliance right now.

I wonder if it was a mix up (the feds didn't know they were fsc members?), or if they feel that the new 4472 statute supercedes the 2257 injunction?

Hrm, let's see.

Incorrectly cross referencing 2257 records = 5 years in prison per offense.

Violating a Federal Judge's injunction against inspecting those records = HRMMMMMM I WONDER

I'm willing to bet it involves the following:

Judge: Uhm. What you durrin?
Attorney General: Oops. Honest Mistake. Sorry.
Judge: Thanks for saying you're sorry. Don't do it again.
Attorney General: Mmk.

Violating the judges order would make the search invalid, so no 5 years for every invalid cross reference.

Too bad, so bad.

Go read the story, the FBI agents talked with the lawyer and decided to go ahead with the search anyway. They truly don't give a shit, apparently.

Alex

JD 10-10-2006 07:34 PM

I agree with Lars. This could be VERY good for the industry

BoyAlley 10-10-2006 07:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RawAlex (Post 11044879)
Violating the judges order would make the search invalid, so no 5 years for every invalid cross reference.

I agree, the BEST that will happen is that in this PARTICULAR case any violations that were found will be thrown out. By all accounts though, no violations were found, so I guess it's all moot.

Rochard 10-10-2006 07:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jact (Post 11043690)
Does the injunction still stand after the newest law passed, whatever the heck the # is? I can't keep up with all the new additions.

I was going to bring up this point as well. There is a new law in place - The Adam Walsh law - and while everyone was up in arms over the new 2257 regs no one seems to have noticed this law went into place and pretty much covers everything the 2257 laws proposed and even more so.

Is it not possible that this new law totally bypasses FSC injunction?

BoyAlley 10-10-2006 07:37 PM


BoyAlley 10-10-2006 07:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 11044939)
Is it not possible that this new law totally bypasses FSC injunction?

That seems to be the question with no answer at this point. I'm curious as to why the FSC hasn't acted against 4472 yet?

AsianDivaGirlsWebDude 10-10-2006 07:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BoyAlley (Post 11044949)
That seems to be the question with no answer at this point. I'm curious as to why the FSC hasn't acted against 4472 yet?

Can someone from the FSC pop in and answer this and update us on any other pertinent matters as well?

It's been awhile since we're heard from you folks...teh Boy Alley donated his sig and raised some nice cash for you, so it would seem to be a reasonable request.

ADG Webmaster

BoyAlley 10-10-2006 07:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AsianDivaGirlsWebDude (Post 11044998)
Can someone from the FSC pop in and answer this and update us on any other pertinent matters as well?

It's been awhile since we're heard from you folks...teh Boy Alley donated his sig and raised some nice cash for you, so it would seem to be a reasonable request.

ADG Webmaster


I have a really bad feeling the answer is that the FSC is hurting for cash in a major way.... :Oh crap


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:12 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123