GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Official in S.C.: Sterilize bad parents (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=661204)

L0rdJuni0r 10-01-2006 12:43 AM

Official in S.C.: Sterilize bad parents
 
CHARLESTON, S.C. - A City Council member, reacting to a video store holdup believed to have been carried out by children, says parents who can't properly care for their kids should be sterilized.

"We pick up stray animals and spay them," Larry Shirley said in a story published Saturday by The Post and Courier of Charleston. "These mothers need to be spayed if they can't take care of theirs. Once they have a child and it's running the street, to let them continue to have children is totally unacceptable."

Shirley's comments come after police say a video store was held up by a group of children, including a 14-year-old girl suspected of wielding a BB gun that looked like a pistol.

The holdup happened about 9 p.m. Wednesday at a Hollywood Video store. A 14-year-old girl and a 12-year-old boy were charged as juveniles with armed robbery. A 9-year-old boy was not charged because police said he was too young. He was released to his mother.

READ MORE HERE

kane 10-01-2006 01:00 AM

This may make me sound bad but in a way I agree. A while back I read a story in the paper about this couple and their kids. The wife was legally mentally retarded and her husband had an IQ that was 5 points above the limit for being legally retarded. For a while they had an apartment, he had a job and they had a life. Then she got pregnant, but didn't know how to care for the kid so the state took it away. A year later the same thing happened and that kid was also taken away.

Then then guy loses his job and they were literally living in a shed and she gets pregnant again and again that kid is taken away. Eventually he gets another job, they get another little apartment and she gets pregnant again. This time she told the state she wanted to keep the kids and they are giving her parenting classes, but she has a long way to go and the social worker said the best she can probably hope for is visitation.

Am I a bastard to think that maybe people like this should have their tubes tied? You know she is going to keep having kids that are going to enter into the system. You have to pass a test to be allowed to drive a car, shouldn't there be some rules put on parenthood?

Bro Media - BANNED FOR LIFE 10-01-2006 01:01 AM

sounds like a good idea

babymaker 10-01-2006 01:10 AM

sign me up....seems only useless people have kids.

i always wonder why some aids infested crackwhore who doesn't even eat is fertile as hell, but a healthy suburban couple that eats organic food and works out etc always has to take fertility drugs?? wtf

L0rdJuni0r 10-01-2006 03:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kane
This may make me sound bad but in a way I agree. A while back I read a story in the paper about this couple and their kids. The wife was legally mentally retarded and her husband had an IQ that was 5 points above the limit for being legally retarded. For a while they had an apartment, he had a job and they had a life. Then she got pregnant, but didn't know how to care for the kid so the state took it away. A year later the same thing happened and that kid was also taken away.

Then then guy loses his job and they were literally living in a shed and she gets pregnant again and again that kid is taken away. Eventually he gets another job, they get another little apartment and she gets pregnant again. This time she told the state she wanted to keep the kids and they are giving her parenting classes, but she has a long way to go and the social worker said the best she can probably hope for is visitation.

Am I a bastard to think that maybe people like this should have their tubes tied? You know she is going to keep having kids that are going to enter into the system. You have to pass a test to be allowed to drive a car, shouldn't there be some rules put on parenthood?



You have a point.

davidd 10-01-2006 03:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by babymaker
sign me up....seems only useless people have kids.

i always wonder why some aids infested crackwhore who doesn't even eat is fertile as hell, but a healthy suburban couple that eats organic food and works out etc always has to take fertility drugs?? wtf

It should be clear that crack is the hidden link to fertlity.

The suburban house wife 'who eats organic food' probably only does cocaine in the form of powder.

Furious_Female 10-01-2006 04:02 AM

That person should be President... there should be breeding laws that are heavily enforced. Bad parents come in all shapes, colors, sizes, income levels, and intellectual capacities.

Any woman that gives birth to a child addicted to any type of drug should be automatically sterilized. Deadbeat dads should be castrated by law and maybe they should start teaching the realistic side of childbirth and parenting to children. If more teenage girls knew that giving birth involves either naturally tearing or being cut from your vagina to your ass, losing your bowels in front of your doctor and nurses and chaging diaper poo after being puked on at 3:00am, then maybe there would be fewer idiots having children that they can't and won't care for properly.

Stupidity is a virus.

brand0n 10-01-2006 05:12 AM

you know in sc you can beat your wife on the court house steps on sunday.

yes. its an old law, but its still a law.

something to think about

SinisterStudios 10-01-2006 05:26 AM

Why is it that stupid people are the first to breed and we have to always pay for them. Im sick and tired of working my ass off to further myself,my family and then pay tons taxes, so some crack whore can live on welfare with 6 kids.
This shit sucks on soo many levels, i say;

If you cant feed'em, dont BREED'EM!!!!!!

jayeff 10-01-2006 05:38 AM

The obvious thing to do would be sterilize the poor, since poverty equates to crime and who gives a f*ck about those people anyway. They are not even people really, are they.

The only potential snag is that our economic system dictates the existence of the poor, as well as the middle class and rich... but hey, when did logic ever get in the way of peoples' prejudices...

Invest 10-01-2006 06:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jayeff
The obvious thing to do would be sterilize the poor, since poverty equates to crime and who gives a f*ck about those people anyway. They are not even people really, are they.

The only potential snag is that our economic system dictates the existence of the poor, as well as the middle class and rich... but hey, when did logic ever get in the way of peoples' prejudices...

God your a heartless person your not any better then the people you speak of. They just fell upon hardtimes could happen to any of us.

L0rdJuni0r 10-01-2006 06:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jayeff
The obvious thing to do would be sterilize the poor, since poverty equates to crime and who gives a f*ck about those people anyway. They are not even people really, are they.



wow man, i hope that was a sarcastic comment. Serilize the poor just because there poor? I know poor people who take better care and raise their kids better than richer people. The amount of money they make has nothing to do with it. its they way they parent. Furious_Female was very right when she said "Bad parents come in all shapes, colors, sizes, income levels, and intellectual capacities." so no, i do not agree with your statement. It was pretty ignorant in my honest opinion.

viki 10-01-2006 06:06 AM

I've said this same thing many times. I think the first step is for the government to pay people to get sterilized. Many drug addicts and other generally unsavory people would go for that voluntarily. In the long run, it would cost less money than it does to give those same people welfare, cheap housing, and nice clean jail cells.

jayeff 10-01-2006 07:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by L0rdJuni0r
i hope that was a sarcastic comment

Unlike the person who responded before you did, at least you managed to sense that I might not have been serious. I would have thought my second paragraph - the comment about logic and prejudice - should have made that quite clear.

Most of us would like to believe we can determine who our children become, but the reality is that for better and worse, many, many children grow up in contradiction of their families and environments. This would become a very strange society if we maintained the idea that someone is innocent of a crime until proven guilty, and yet declared unborn children unfit to live because of the shortcomings of their parents.

This councilman's statement however - although he likely doesn't realize it and he has certainly reached a conclusion with which I have zero sympathy - does at least reflect two factors which are real.

The first is that the vast majority of children grow up to become adults at or below the same economic level as their parents. The second is that crime correlates much more closely to poverty than to the amount of resources put into policing, etc. So yes, if you completely ignore the "codes" on which our society is presently based and don't have even the most basic understanding of how our economy works, I suppose you could decide that sterilising the poor would reduce crime. Note: I realize this guy didn't mention the word "poor" but we all know that middle-class parents wouldn't dream of letting their children run the streets like stray dogs, so let's be clear who he is stereotyping.

Don't forget it's election time. The Goebel's style of TV ads - scare everyone and then offer to protect them - have already started, so we can expect more than the usual number of outrageous comments from politicos over the next month.

Quotealex 10-01-2006 07:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SinisterStudios
Im sick and tired of working my ass off to further myself,my family and then pay tons taxes, so some crack whore can live on welfare with 6 kids.

Only a very small percentage of your taxes goes goes to "some crack whore can live on welfare with 6 kids", if more of our taxes was allocated to helping poor people, we'd have a better society...

HomoErectus 10-01-2006 09:07 AM

Didnt S.C. also ban sex toys? Not saying i dont agree with breeding laws or sterilization, but this is one of those fucked up states that needs to break off and float out into the ocean and sink.

Peaches 10-01-2006 09:11 AM

I've always thought that when you go to sign up for kid #3 for welfare, you should have to sign for the depo provera shot too.

It's harder legally to adopt a stray dog than it is to have a kid.

MandyBlake 10-01-2006 10:34 AM

i've always thought that you should have to get a license to have children...you have to have a license to drive.

tony286 10-01-2006 10:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peaches
I've always thought that when you go to sign up for kid #3 for welfare, you should have to sign for the depo provera shot too.

It's harder legally to adopt a stray dog than it is to have a kid.

We agree on this and to me its should be after kid one on welfare.

pr0 10-01-2006 10:38 AM

You're suprised a govt official said this?

Was 1940 really that long ago in the course of human history to be suprised?


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:45 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123