GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   The Butterfly Effect 2 (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=660291)

StuartD 09-28-2006 06:36 AM

The Butterfly Effect 2
 
Thoughts on this? Seems to me that Copywood just simply can not come out with a unique idea... they either need to remake everything or take a finished story and take the premise of it but make a completely different story around it which has no other relation to the original story what so ever.

born4porn 09-28-2006 06:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by StuartD
Thoughts on this? Seems to me that Copywood just simply can not come out with a unique idea... they either need to remake everything or take a finished story and take the premise of it but make a completely different story around it which has no other relation to the original story what so ever.

it's sad they could not have left that one alone, the original movie was fairly well done ! :thumbsup

Klen 09-28-2006 06:42 AM

It sound good.We will see.

Matt 26z 09-28-2006 07:05 AM

I've always wanted them to make a Back to the Future part 4. Butterfly Effect was the closest thing to it, so I liked the movie. I didn't even know they made a second one.

ImLost 09-28-2006 07:14 AM

i thought the first one was pretty good!

E$_manager 09-28-2006 07:16 AM

You mean it is a remake? Or contenuance?

Mr. Romance 09-28-2006 07:17 AM

I need to see the first one

Mr. Romance

StuartD 09-28-2006 07:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cristie
You mean it is a remake? Or contenuance?

Neither. It's just a different story about a guy who can do the same thing as the guy in the first movie.

E$_manager 09-28-2006 07:27 AM

I liked the first one. Very good. ANd it had two endings - good and bad.

E$_manager 09-28-2006 07:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by StuartD
Neither. It's just a different story about a guy who can do the same thing as the guy in the first movie.

Then it is not interesting..:( If the idea is already old, it would be hard to see it - will make the comparisons all the way.:Oh crap

SlamDesigns 09-28-2006 07:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cristie
I liked the first one. Very good. ANd it had two endings - good and bad.

It actually had 4 endings. I've only seen one of them, but read about the other 3.

E$_manager 09-28-2006 08:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SlamDesigns
It actually had 4 endings. I've only seen one of them, but read about the other 3.

Oh? I thought happy and unhappy end :) I saw happy. Don't like bad ends :)

Doctor Dre 09-28-2006 08:32 AM

I just don't get how they can make a 2nd one...

HammerALL 09-28-2006 08:39 AM

The first one was very good - I don't really know anything about this second one - when was it out - is it out????

Babagirls 09-28-2006 08:41 AM

whos the main actor?

StuartD 09-28-2006 08:46 AM

It's a direct to DVD release for some time in 2007. That's about all I can find out.

And the actors can be found here: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0457297/
Eric Lively
Erica Durance

feN 09-28-2006 08:48 AM

direct to DVD releases usually suck :(
the first part was pretty cool though

Sosa 09-28-2006 08:50 AM

First one was cool, not too sure about this one

Dragar 09-28-2006 08:53 AM

movies are just as lame as TV now
I've seen enough people subjecting themselves to eating bugs for a lifetime
maybe they should be retrained to come up with something original

E$_manager 09-28-2006 09:08 AM

Eric Lively
Erica Durance
Don't know them.

AliGbone 09-28-2006 09:20 AM

yo dat first one was the macenzie dug that flick

madawgz 09-28-2006 09:50 AM

i liked the first one, we will see what the do next...:\

fetishblog 09-28-2006 09:53 AM

Can't be any worse then the 29364832 movies about death stalking them because someone had a premonition and saved themselves from some horrible mishap.

CaptainHowdy 09-28-2006 09:56 AM

Why ???

KaliC 09-28-2006 09:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by StuartD
Thoughts on this? Seems to me that Copywood just simply can not come out with a unique idea... they either need to remake everything or take a finished story and take the premise of it but make a completely different story around it which has no other relation to the original story what so ever.

I thought the first one was a great movie, surprised it didn't do better. Hopefully they will get Jessica Alba this time for the distressed crack whore.

http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/enterta...4738612991.jpg

J. Falcon 09-28-2006 09:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by born4porn
it's sad they could not have left that one alone, the original movie was fairly well done ! :thumbsup



You got to be kidding, the original was pure shit, one of the worst movies I've ever seen by far.

TDF 09-28-2006 10:01 AM

theres a part 2??

Aneros Josh 09-28-2006 10:07 AM

Seems to me with a name like Copywood, they wouldn't be expected to come up with a unique idea

E$_manager 09-28-2006 10:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by J. Falcon
You got to be kidding, the original was pure shit, one of the worst movies I've ever seen by far.

What was the original movie? What year?

gideongallery 09-28-2006 10:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by StuartD
It's a direct to DVD release for some time in 2007. That's about all I can find out.

And the actors can be found here: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0457297/
Eric Lively
Erica Durance

erica durance is lois lane from smallville

http://www.comicscontinuum.com/stori...mallville1.jpg

Aneros Josh 09-28-2006 10:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gideongallery
erica durance is lois lane from smallville

http://www.comicscontinuum.com/stori...mallville1.jpg

Is that a sequined american flag bikini? Wow...high class written all over her :)

HighRoller 03-17-2007 02:04 PM

that is so weird that you brought up back to the future 4
thats weird
I literally saw this less than 2 minutes ago
https://youtube.com/watch?v=iwY5o2fsG7Y

Strickie 03-17-2007 02:35 PM

first one was great....I don't know about a second one :Oh crap

Adultnet 03-17-2007 02:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by born4porn (Post 10942561)
it's sad they could not have left that one alone, the original movie was fairly well done ! :thumbsup

yeah ... indeed:upsidedow

cj_purve 03-17-2007 05:54 PM

why come up with a unique idea when you can make a cool couple of hundred million off redoing the same idea under the same name with far less marketing costs?!

Take Matrix 3 for example .... 2 was crap, but 3 still made over 400 million ...

Matrix 1
Budget 63million
Earnings 456million

Matrix 2
Budget 150million (were 2 & 3 made together?)
Earnings 736million

Matrix 3
Budget 150million
Earnings 424million

Who cares if the audience is bitchin' when you're pulling in 400 million from their pockets!!!

We're all suckers.

xsabn 03-17-2007 05:55 PM

is not so good like the first one

SBJ 03-17-2007 06:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xsabn (Post 12100698)
is not so good like the first one

that's putting it lightly! I loved the 1st one but this part 2 sucked!

Aquarius 03-17-2007 06:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cj_purve (Post 12100694)
why come up with a unique idea when you can make a cool couple of hundred million off redoing the same idea under the same name with far less marketing costs?!

Take Matrix 3 for example .... 2 was crap, but 3 still made over 400 million ...

Matrix 1
Budget 63million
Earnings 456million

Matrix 2
Budget 150million (were 2 & 3 made together?)
Earnings 736million

Matrix 3
Budget 150million
Earnings 424million

Who cares if the audience is bitchin' when you're pulling in 400 million from their pockets!!!

We're all suckers.

Exactly. It is just marketing and more money in their pockets.

one eight 03-17-2007 06:19 PM

Bingo. In their world, we're all surfers. How much do we care about the surfer user experience?

KrisKross 03-17-2007 07:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cj_purve (Post 12100694)
why come up with a unique idea when you can make a cool couple of hundred million off redoing the same idea under the same name with far less marketing costs?!

Take Matrix 3 for example .... 2 was crap, but 3 still made over 400 million ...

Matrix 1
Budget 63million
Earnings 456million

Matrix 2
Budget 150million (were 2 & 3 made together?)
Earnings 736million

Matrix 3
Budget 150million
Earnings 424million

Who cares if the audience is bitchin' when you're pulling in 400 million from their pockets!!!

We're all suckers.

Yes, Reloaded and Revolutions were filmed together, along with scenes for the videogame "Enter The Matrix"

J. Falcon 03-17-2007 10:06 PM

the first one really sucked

TigerDragon 03-17-2007 10:35 PM

sounds good

lorine 03-19-2007 01:12 AM

I didn`t like the first part,maybe this one will be better although i seriously doubt that...

Mr. Manson 03-19-2007 01:54 AM

I like the first part far better than the second

madawgz 03-19-2007 01:54 AM

i heard it sucks :(...

fris 03-19-2007 03:34 AM

i liked the first one

Boobs 03-19-2007 03:35 AM

first one was really good eventhough i hate ashton kutcher

aiko 03-19-2007 06:39 AM

2nd one sucks

salesman 03-19-2007 09:47 AM

I thought the movie will end the same way Butterfly Effect 1 did, but the end of 2nd part was not bad, too

TG Rebecca 03-19-2007 01:17 PM

i liked the first one, for the most part. it was enjoyable. :) the second one was horrible, i kept falling asleep watching it and it just kept getting worse. from now on, i'm not renting anything that goes straight to dvd. :)


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:18 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123