Is your site Web 2.0 compliant?
 

Make sure with the Web 2.0 Validator http://web2.0validator.com/

I got an 8 out of 52 on one of my sites :upsidedow

Is Shadows-aware ? Yes!
Appears to be web 3.0 ? Yes!
Uses Cascading Style Sheets? Yes!
Refers to Flickr ? Yes!
Possibly contains bytes ? Yes!
Refers to del.icio.us ? Yes!
Uses Semantic Markup? Yes!
Appears to over-punctuate ? Yes!

I fucken suck

The score for http://www.isthatup.com is 3 out of 52

* Is in public beta? No
* Uses python? No
* Uses inline AJAX ? No
* Is Shadows-aware ? No
* Uses the prefix "meta" or "micro"? No
* Mentions Less is More ? No
* Appears to be non-empty ? No
* Has favicon ? No
* Has a Blogline blogroll ? No
* Refers to mash-ups ? No
* Uses tags ? No
* Mentions startup ? No
* Uses Cascading Style Sheets? Yes!
* Attempts to be XHTML Strict ? No
* Appears to be web 3.0 ? Yes!
* Uses Google Maps API? No
* Rocks out to the dance noise of Chinese Forehead ? No
* Mentions Dave Legg ? No
* Refers to the Web 2.0 Validator's ruleset ? No
* Appears to use AJAX ? No
* Mentions an "architecture of participation"? No
* Makes reference to hahahahahahahahahaha ? No
* Appears to be built using Ruby on Rails ? No
* Refers to Flickr ? No
* Mentions Chinese Forehead ? No
* Refers to VCs ? No
* Mentions Nitro ? No
* Mentions The Long Tail ? No
* Possibly contains bytes ? Yes!
* Mentions Ruby? No
* Mentions Cool Words ? No
* Links Slashdot and Digg ? No
* Mentions Ruby ? No
* Appears to use MonoRail ? No
* Creative Commons license ? No
* Refers to podcasting ? No
* Has prototype.js ? No
* Actually mentions Web 2.0 ? No
* Uses Semantic Markup? No
* Use Catalyst ? No
* Refers to del.icio.us ? No
* Refers to web2.0validator ? No
* Uses microformats ? No
* Mentions RDF and the Semantic Web? No
* Refers to Rocketboom ? No
* References Firefox? No
* Validates as XHTML 1.1 ? No
* Appears to over-punctuate ? No
* References isometric.sixsided.org? No
* Mentions 30 Second Rule and Web 2.0 ? No
* Appears to have Adsense ? No
* Uses the "blink" tag? No

omfg, if i dont flickr my stuff, im sure digg will get ahold of my tag clouds, and then ill be sooooo behind on my ajax beta prototype.

My server appears to be down.

The score for http://www.dwhs.com is 4 out of 51

So what's good anyways?

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh

It's just a parody site :)

:1orglaugh

Funny shit for sure. Web2.0 is so overrated.

The score for http://www.cnn.com is 6 out of 51

from that site....
All the rules of web 2.0 are provided by users of this site. The definition of web 2.0 changes on a daily basis. Now you can keep up with your web 2.0-ness since this site checks randomly against the most recent rules decreed by it's users.

What a load of crap... lol

It's a joke... it's made to be funny.

:1orglaugh it's official... I'm an idiot

I actually laughed at that.

I'm a fucking dork.

Yeah I know.. but some people weren't clueing in.. :1orglaugh

Ditto :helpme