GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   BMW Hydrogen 7 (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=656592)

e-god 09-18-2006 02:59 AM

BMW Hydrogen 7
 
Finally :thumbsup
Quote:

MUNICH (Reuters) - BMW will roll out the world's first hydrogen-burning car in serial production early next year, the German premium automaker said on Tuesday, eager to put its stamp on cars with green credentials.
ADVERTISEMENT

The specially equipped 7-Series executive cars emit only water vapor when running on hydrogen.

The car hits the market next April and will be shown at the Los Angeles car show in November, the company said. It had said in March the hydrogen cars would arrive within two years.

A spokesman said the car would be leased to selected customers rather than sold because of its high price. Leasing rates would be similar to those for a top-end BMW 760LI with a full-service package.

The BMW 7 Series Hydrogen 7 Saloon is powered by a 260 hp twelve-cylinder engine and accelerates from 0-100 km/h (62 mph) in 9.5 seconds. Top speed is limited electronically to 230 km/h.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060912/...mw_hydrogen_dc

http://mishuna.image.pbase.com/u20/a....photo0012.jpg

http://mk23.image.pbase.com/u20/akid....photo0009.jpg

http://www.hybridcars.com/blogs/imag...drogen-gas.jpg

a1ka1ine 09-18-2006 04:40 AM

a step in the right direction! and 0-100kmh in 9.5 isnt so shabby for something so environmentally friendly

free4porn 09-18-2006 04:50 AM

nice car and environmentally friendly too :)

micker 09-18-2006 05:48 AM

I wouldnt mind one at all...

12clicks 09-18-2006 05:58 AM

also, honda is putting out a version where the hydrogen power plant will also power your home.

MattOT 09-18-2006 06:08 AM

yea not bad how much more will it cost then the normal one?

E$_manager 09-18-2006 06:15 AM

it looks good, but in must be expensive. Or not?

Elixir 09-18-2006 07:49 AM

Realy nice car :) Me need one of them :)

donross 09-18-2006 08:45 AM

i wish i can.. not by a chance..

Marshal 09-18-2006 09:20 AM

really nice car! :)

media 09-18-2006 09:22 AM

Too bad that hydrogen filling stations are not on each corner.. hehe

Aneros Josh 09-18-2006 09:53 AM

I remember hearing something about technology like this from BMW about 10 years ago but oil lobbying was preventing them from developing it...anyone else ever hear the same story?

Vitasoy 09-18-2006 06:59 PM

Nice... ride looks clean too

baycouples 09-18-2006 07:02 PM

I bought a brand new 7-series less than 3 years ago. I will never EVER buy a BMW ever again. That brand will never get a penny from me.

d00t 09-18-2006 07:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baycouples
I bought a brand new 7-series less than 3 years ago. I will never EVER buy a BMW ever again. That brand will never get a penny from me.

seriously? i bought my first bmw yesterday and have nothing but praise so far :)

tranza 09-18-2006 07:09 PM

Awesome!!!

:)

facialfreak 09-18-2006 07:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FleshJosh
I remember hearing something about technology like this from BMW about 10 years ago but oil lobbying was preventing them from developing it...anyone else ever hear the same story?

Sounds like that movie last year "Death of the Electric Car" ...

squishypimp 09-18-2006 07:19 PM

oh snap that so awesome :)

woj 09-18-2006 07:20 PM

neat :thumbsup

After Shock Media 09-18-2006 07:24 PM

Doesnt anyone remember history at all?

Ironic again it is German. Guess we shall all just forget that whole balloon incident.

Im not to fond of this whole hyrdrogen thing. Cant we just use sugar or something?

gecko 09-18-2006 10:05 PM

The way of the future

After Shock Media 09-18-2006 10:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gecko
The way of the future

I am betting on sugar based fuel.

bhutocracy 09-18-2006 10:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by After Shock Media
Doesnt anyone remember history at all?

Ironic again it is German. Guess we shall all just forget that whole balloon incident.

Im not to fond of this whole hyrdrogen thing. Cant we just use sugar or something?


umm.. you fill a balloon full of gasoline and set it on fire and it will go up just as badly as a zeppelin full of hydrogen lol. Both are massively different to a hydrogen fuel cell.

bhutocracy 09-18-2006 10:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by After Shock Media
I am betting on sugar based fuel.

ethanol is already here and used in blends. Biofuels will be big though.

After Shock Media 09-18-2006 10:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bhutocracy
umm.. you fill a balloon full of gasoline and set it on fire and it will go up just as badly as a zeppelin full of hydrogen lol. Both are massively different to a hydrogen fuel cell.

I am aware of that. Yet if I drop a lit match into a bucket of gas it will go out. I drop a match near hydrogen and it will go boom.

Now judging the people use see working at gas stations as well as the average US citizen, do you really want to mix that sort of intellect with such a fuel?

bhutocracy 09-18-2006 10:36 PM

The Facts on the Hindenburg Disaster:
1. The bags of hydrogen that provided the lifting force for the Hindenburg were NOT the main contributor to the fire. The surface of the ship was coated with a combination of dark iron oxide and reflective aluminum paint. These components are extremely flammable and burn at a tremendously energetic rate once ignited. The skin of the airship was ignited by electrical discharge from the clouds while docking during an electrical storm. This reaction has been proven chemically for years, and was demonstrated with actual remnants of the Hindenburg sixty years later, which burned as vigorously as on the day of the disaster.
2. The hydrogen burned quickly, safely, above the occupants. When the escaping hydrogen was ignited by the burning skin of the airship, it burned far above the airship, and was completely consumed within 60 seconds of the ignition. During this period of time, the airship descended to the ground from the 150-foot docking tower.
3. Almost all deaths were caused by jumping or falling from the airship. Of the 35 deaths from the disaster, 33 were caused by jumping or falling. Only two deaths were caused by burning, and it is likely that those two were from proximity to the burning skin of the airship, or from the stores of diesel fuel that were ignited by the covering. Whereas the hydrogen burned within one minute of ignition, the diesel fires burned for up to ten hours after the ignition.
4. The Hindenburg would have burned if it had been filled with inert helium gas. Even if the Hindenburg had not been lifted by hydrogen, the ignition of the covering would still have happened, and would then have set ablaze the diesel stores, resulting in the same disaster.
5. The main cause of the disaster was pilot error. The only way to prevent the disaster would have been if the pilot had chosen to land in better conditions elsewhere, which was very feasible, considering he had had enough fuel remaining to reach all the way to California.

Lykos 09-18-2006 10:55 PM

BMW is BMW :thumbsup

After Shock Media 09-18-2006 10:58 PM

Hmm coincidence or not.

The US Macon (air ship) that went down in 35 off the coast of CA, is being viewed by subs today.

d00t 09-18-2006 11:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by After Shock Media
I am aware of that. Yet if I drop a lit match into a bucket of gas it will go out. I drop a match near hydrogen and it will go boom.

Now judging the people use see working at gas stations as well as the average US citizen, do you really want to mix that sort of intellect with such a fuel?

what year are you living in now ASM? :)

Technology has advanced a lot in the last 50 years. We have hot water and eletrcity in every home now!

Cars are also out that are powerd by nuclear technology. Extremely safe too.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:46 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123