GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum
Page 1 of 2 1 2 >
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Pluto's new name is No. 134340 WTF!! (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=655611)

UniversalPass Pete 09-14-2006 06:41 PM
Pluto's new name is No. 134340 WTF!!
 
Pluto not a planet anymore! Say it ain't so!:pimp

Don't these fucks have anything better to do than eliminate Pluto from planet status??........After 70 years? :1orglaugh

SAVE PLUTO!

http://news.yahoo.com/s/space/200609...tanumber134340

1200mics 09-14-2006 06:48 PM
Giving a number name to Pluto? that's unfair :(

Zarathustra 09-14-2006 06:56 PM
Size Doesn't Matter! :mad:

Furious_Female 09-14-2006 07:13 PM
Save Pluto!

Barefootsies 09-14-2006 07:20 PM
http://www.brown.edu/Students/INDY/a.../arts/fuck.jpg

dynastoned 09-14-2006 07:23 PM
why all the fuss about fucking pluto lately?

Nookster 09-14-2006 07:23 PM
I have to agree that Pluto is in fact not a planet, as it's not solid in any way...but by definition it should be classified as a planet.

"A nonluminous celestial body larger than an asteroid or comet, illuminated by light from a star, such as the sun, around which it revolves."

Pluto is nonluminous, larger than an asteroid or comet, is illuminated by light from the Sun, and revolves around a star (the Sun).

But I guess they do have some rationalising data against it....I'm kind of a science buff. :winkwink:

notabook 09-14-2006 07:29 PM
Fuck those sons a bitches up their asses with a rusty halberd. Those fucktards have no right to change anything about Pluto! Save Pluto mother fuckers, save it now! I mean god damn it, they could grandfather it in and still make it a planet, but those assfucks are evil incarnate and want poor Pluto to be kicked off the planetary squad… fucking assholes!

I LOVE Little Brown Asses 09-14-2006 07:44 PM
#1. They are scientists. You are webmasters. They don't get to decide what counts as a good Revshare percent. You don't get to decide what makes a planet.

Well, fuck it. I had #2 and #3, but after re-reading it, #1 is all I need. Let it go. You want to get upset about something, how about the massacres in Darfur? The privatization of water in India. The extremist movements in East Timor and southern Thailand. The war crimes of the Bush Administration. The destruction of Tibetian culture. The retirement of Schumacher from F1. Anything that actually affects YOUR planet. :angrysoap

NickPapageorgio 09-14-2006 07:59 PM
http://almostlucky.com/solar.jpg

Verbal 09-14-2006 08:03 PM
My Very Educated Mom Just Made Us Nine 134340 ... that won't work

reynold 09-14-2006 08:08 PM
I just hope Plutonians wont turn their planet into the dark side and wage war against us. :helpme

sonofsam 09-14-2006 08:09 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by NickPapageorgio
:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

sniperwolf 09-14-2006 08:51 PM
what assurance are they giving us now about their latest conclusion or just mere hypothesis? :Oh crap.. is that what they're trying to say after 70 yrs, then what comes next after another century?

Scootermuze 09-14-2006 08:53 PM
I'd be interested to know how many millioms in taxpayer bucks they paid some team to determine this life changing moment..

It's been Pluto since 1930, so just grandfather the thing in and let it remain a planet.. I don't think it's gonna be the end of the world...

coca-cola 09-14-2006 09:03 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by I LOVE Little Brown Asses
#1. They are scientists. You are webmasters. They don't get to decide what counts as a good Revshare percent. You don't get to decide what makes a planet.

Well, fuck it. I had #2 and #3, but after re-reading it, #1 is all I need. Let it go. You want to get upset about something, how about the massacres in Darfur? The privatization of water in India. The extremist movements in East Timor and southern Thailand. The war crimes of the Bush Administration. The destruction of Tibetian culture. The retirement of Schumacher from F1. Anything that actually affects YOUR planet. :angrysoap


exactly!

UniversalPass Pete 09-14-2006 09:35 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by sonofsam
:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh Nice one!:thumbsup

UniversalPass Pete 09-14-2006 09:48 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by NickPapageorgio
OOOPs! meant to reply to this! lol:1orglaugh :1orglaugh

Magix 09-14-2006 09:50 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by NickPapageorgio

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh OMG What a stupid name

UniversalPass Pete 09-14-2006 09:54 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by I LOVE Little Brown Asses
#1. They are scientists. You are webmasters. They don't get to decide what counts as a good Revshare percent. You don't get to decide what makes a planet.

Well, fuck it. I had #2 and #3, but after re-reading it, #1 is all I need. Let it go. You want to get upset about something, how about the massacres in Darfur? The privatization of water in India. The extremist movements in East Timor and southern Thailand. The war crimes of the Bush Administration. The destruction of Tibetian culture. The retirement of Schumacher from F1. Anything that actually affects YOUR planet. :angrysoap
That was my point! pehapse you didn't get it! It's such a trivial thing, yet all the media coverage, and the pooling of the great scientific minds all to conclude after 70 years that Pluto is in fact, not! a planet! Who gives a fuck! But who gives a fuck if it's left alone as Pluto!!! I have probably waisted to much time posting over this crap anyway!:1orglaugh

After Shock Media 09-14-2006 10:00 PM
Scientifically there is nothing silly about it. Problem is Pluto is damn small. Another scientist found 2 other objects larger than Pluto. Thus the renewed debate. Would every object be classified as a planet that is so big? If so we would end up with several hundreds if not thousands of planets in our solar system. So we needed a criteria, one based on size. Thus Pluto is no longer a planet.

Not to many years back they tried to remove it before these findings. Public outcry and nostalgia kept it as a planet.

By the way whoever said anything about millions in taxes, what taxes? It was an international scientific board.

Ace_luffy 09-14-2006 10:10 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by NickPapageorgio
:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

but it's unfair you remove the planet on solar system because of some technicalities...

idiots!!!!!!!!

rodney25 09-14-2006 10:37 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ace_luffy
:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

but it's unfair you remove the planet on solar system because of some technicalities...

idiots!!!!!!!!

Please, calm down. I hope this issue won't ultimately divide us as peace loving citizens of this world.

Vitasoy 09-14-2006 11:03 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by NickPapageorgio
haha that cracks me up every time

nAtuRaLbEautY 09-14-2006 11:36 PM
that's plain crazy

sharp 09-14-2006 11:37 PM
haven't heard this news yet!!







....j/k

starpimps 09-14-2006 11:37 PM
they should just spend their time jerkin it instead wtf

brand0n 09-15-2006 12:13 AM
ICANN Registrar: GO DADDY SOFTWARE, INC.
Created: 11-Sep-2006

13430.com

After Shock Media 09-15-2006 12:21 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by starpimps
they should just spend their time jerkin it instead wtf
ya why in the hell should they use reason, logic, data, and technicalities when dealing with science. I say all science should be determined by nostalgia, the hearts of the people, and of course public opinion. :disgust

FlyingIguana 09-15-2006 06:29 AM
why all the hate for pluto? it orbits the sun, its big and round. looks like a planet to me

cezam 09-15-2006 06:54 AM
fuck them. it's still Pluto for me. :1orglaugh

E$_manager 09-15-2006 06:59 AM
Poor Pluto..:(

fallenmuffin 09-15-2006 07:02 AM
This summer.. the hottest sci-fi movie to hit the screen!

They came from No. 134340

E$_manager 09-15-2006 07:07 AM
i think it is still Pluto for everyone.

ADL Colin 09-15-2006 07:09 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nookster
I have to agree that Pluto is in fact not a planet, as it's not solid in any way...but by definition it should be classified as a planet.
So Jupiter is not a planet cuz it's gaseous? Man, don't get them started.

E$_manager 09-15-2006 07:11 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by fallenmuffin
This summer.. the hottest sci-fi movie to hit the screen!

They came from No. 134340
:1orglaugh Great!

free4porn 09-15-2006 07:14 AM
nooo pluto!

SCORE Ralph 09-15-2006 07:38 AM
Isnt this old news? They were considering it, but it wasnt removed. Instead by the new definition, there are 12 planets now. New ones are Charon (formerly a moon of Pluto, now a twin planet), Ceres (formerly largest asteroid in asteroid belt), and UB313 (larger than Pluto):

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/4795755.stm

Boobs 09-15-2006 09:37 AM
so we only have 8 planets now? :error

Nookster 09-15-2006 11:37 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ADL Colin
So Jupiter is not a planet cuz it's gaseous? Man, don't get them started.
Let me directly quote from my blog post at my science blog...

Quote:
So what?s all the fuss about?
Since it?s discovery by Clyde Tombaugh at Lowell Observatory in 1930, Pluto has been incorrectly categorized as a planet. With recent observations and studies Pluto has shown itself to not fit well with its counterparts. Although Pluto does share some characteristics which define a planet (like being nonluminous and orbiting a star) it was classified incorrectly in the first place for several reasons?

1. Size. Pluto?s mass is 25 times smaller than Mercury?s and only 9 times larger than that of Ceres, the largest body in the asteroid belt. Some recent large Kuiper Belt Objects (notably Sedna) are likely larger than Ceres, if smaller than Pluto (and the recently discovered ?Xena? or 2003 UB313 may be larger than Pluto). However, any lower cutoff in size for planets is arbitrary, and putting it above or below Pluto?s size and mass is a question of individual preference.
2. Environment. Our solar system can be roughly divided into two kinds of regions: those where major planets orbit, which are mostly free of small bodies, and the regions where there are no planets and where many small bodies orbit (the examples of the latter are the asteroid belt and the Kuiper belt). While this division is not perfect (comets and some asteroids do cross planetary orbits, but these are few and their orbits are unstable), it does reflect an important fact that a planet?s gravity strongly influnces its surroundings, while asteroids affect each other mainly by direct collisions.

According to the IAU the definition of a planet follows:

(1) A planet is a celestial body that
(a) is in orbit around the Sun,
(b) has sufficient mass for its self-gravity to overcome rigid body forces so that it assumes a hydrostatic equalibrium (nearly round) shape, and
(c) has cleared the neighbourhood around its orbit.

Now lets take a look at the definition of a dwarf planet according to the IAU:

(2) A ?dwarf planet? is a celestial body that
(a) is in orbit around the Sun,
(b) has sufficient mass for its self-gravity to overcome rigid body forces so that it assumes a hydrostatic equalibrium (nearly round) shape,
(c) has not cleared the neighbourhood around its orbit, and
(d) is not a satellite.

In light of the recent changes made by the International Astronomical Union to the definition of a planet, I have to agree with their re-classifications and removal of Pluto from the list of official planets.

Read more?
Official response: IAU: The status of Pluto: A clarification
Official definition: PDF: Resolution 5, Definition of a Planet in the Solar System

fhgmaster 09-15-2006 12:43 PM
All adult webmasters should unite and serving porn until they call it Pluto again.

Just to put some pressure on the scientific community. :1orglaugh

borked 09-15-2006 12:49 PM
A Pluto by any other name doth not a Milky Way make.
Well, at least No. 134340 ruins my appetite.

squishypimp 09-15-2006 12:49 PM
pluto deserves to be kept as pluto.

psili 09-15-2006 12:50 PM
Gordie: Mickey is a mouse, Donald is a duck, Pluto is a dog. What's Goofy...?
Teddy: He's a dog, he's definitely a dog...
Chris: He can't be a dog, he wears a hat and drives a car...
Vern: Yeah, that is weird. What the hell is Goofy?

pornguy 09-15-2006 01:28 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by NickPapageorgio

SAVE PLUTO


thats Mickeys Dog!


Oh. Errrrr...

czarina 09-15-2006 01:30 PM
ohhh poor Pluto :(

GatorB 09-15-2006 01:50 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by aspwm
Isnt this old news? They were considering it, but it wasnt removed. Instead by the new definition, there are 12 planets now. New ones are Charon (formerly a moon of Pluto, now a twin planet), Ceres (formerly largest asteroid in asteroid belt), and UB313 (larger than Pluto):

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/4795755.stm
Wrong! We have 8 planets now not 12. Try keeping up.

GatorB 09-15-2006 01:54 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nookster
I have to agree that Pluto is in fact not a planet, as it's not solid in any way...but by definition it should be classified as a planet.

"A nonluminous celestial body larger than an asteroid or comet, illuminated by light from a star, such as the sun, around which it revolves."

Pluto is nonluminous, larger than an asteroid or comet, is illuminated by light from the Sun, and revolves around a star (the Sun).

But I guess they do have some rationalising data against it....I'm kind of a science buff. :winkwink:
Well you could the same thing about the MOON. The moon isn't a planet. more than likely Pluto was a moon of Neptune that got it's orbit fucked up.

Manowar 09-15-2006 02:02 PM
thats fucked up

Nookster 09-15-2006 02:05 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by GatorB
Well you could the same thing about the MOON. The moon isn't a planet. more than likely Pluto was a moon of Neptune that got it's orbit fucked up.
The Moon is a satellite, as it revolves around a body other than a star.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nookster
According to the IAU the definition of a planet follows:

(1) A planet is a celestial body that
(a) is in orbit around the Sun,
(b) has sufficient mass for its self-gravity to overcome rigid body forces so that it assumes a hydrostatic equalibrium (nearly round) shape, and
(c) has cleared the neighbourhood around its orbit.

Now lets take a look at the definition of a dwarf planet according to the IAU:

(2) A ?dwarf planet? is a celestial body that
(a) is in orbit around the Sun,
(b) has sufficient mass for its self-gravity to overcome rigid body forces so that it assumes a hydrostatic equalibrium (nearly round) shape,
(c) has not cleared the neighbourhood around its orbit, and
(d) is not a satellite.
Oh I read that wrong...well, Pluto was never orbiting any other body other than the Sun, fact.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:21 PM.
Page 1 of 2 1 2 >
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123