Is the government itself in violation of 2257?
 

I saw this story about a California comedianne who wanted to trademark the phrase "you cum like a girl", which was denied by the patent and trademark office because the word cum is "directly associated with degrading sexual acts,". In their response they used several images to back up their decision, WHICH CAN BE SEEN BY ANYONE (INCLUDING UNDERAGE CHILDREN) ON THEIR WEBSITE!!

There are images there from CUMFIESTA.com and SPERMSHACK.com. Not sure if the gov't has their permission to use their images online, or if they have the 2257 documents to display the material.

Somebody call the Atty General!

I guess the good news is that at least they created links to the websites! Click on the Offc action outgoing link

Oh you gotta love that!
Downloaded completely and fwd'd to my attorney...might just come in handy some day...

haha it would be so funny to sue the government under their own law

bump for the night crew

did you find it or read it here?

fucking-around-and-business-discussion/654519-govt-sends-porn-woman-whos-galleries.html

trying to take the glorie for it?

do as i say, not as i do....

hehe :)

Printouts of articles downloaded from the Internet are admissible as evidence of information available to the general public, and of the way in which a term is being used by the public. - good lord this is ridiculous. haha

Hmm howmuch i remember word cum has been used by some churchs hehe

that is intresting.:winkwink:

I actually got it from a news clipping service I subscribe to. I just thought it was funny to see porn offered from the governments website. I was particularly amazed that they included links to the sites.

Thats great. I wonder if they are members.

One of the adult attorneys should bite on this and run with it. What a perfect opportunity to shove it up their asses.