| ronaldo |
08-08-2006 02:20 PM |
I'm not a lawyer by any means, but I can't see how a lawyer can't present the following case and ultimately have the secondary producer thrown out...HOPEFULLY before the scenario comes to pass.
-A stalker signs up for an affiliate program and requests 2257/4472 documents on a specific model. He makes his way to said models house, where she has 2 younger siblings. One brother 12, one sister 13. He stalks the house for many days and finally realizes that this is an old address, or the model is simply away.
Reaching a dead end, he attacks, rapes and murders the 13 year old sister.
This 13 year old has NOTHING to do with porn. She is one of the very children that this law is supposed to protect. While the former DOJ has all but stated that it's worth risking the life of the models to enact this legislation, HOW can the government now say that it's okay to also risk the life of anyone and everyone around them, who may or may not know what they do for a living? Including younger siblings.
In Canada there's a little thing called the Privacy act, where this would simply never fly.
|
