REUTERS admits of editing image of bombarded areas in lebanon
 

Original image that was shown :

http://www.ynet.co.il/PicServer2/201...0/LBN20_wa.jpg

Then after some image experts revealed that it was photochoped they released an urgent msg to their media stations to stop using this image :

http://www.ynet.co.il/PicServer2/201...BN20_wa(1).jpg

some more of it here :

http://www.leftandright.us/index.php..._faking_photos


:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

by the way the original shoot is :

http://www.ynet.co.il/PicServer2/201...5/LBN20_wa.jpg

whats the difference

the smoke ?

Shitty use of the clone stamp.

The original looks better, anyway.

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

Elron, that posted in the original thread by AlexG, is beating the horse to death ... :1orglaugh

You really needed a second thread ... I understand, you guys had so little to grasp for the past 4 years, that this is big fucking news ...

Do you have an idea how many pictures or film are " altered " ....

True dat

:disgust

Next time check the source of the images in my post before you laugh like a retard .

So... a jewish zionist paper .. so what ?

Those were posted in AlexG thread ... you must like remakes ... :321GFY

And I never said they were not doctored ... READ... READ ... READ ... and quote my post where I say so ...

you prove my point , you are a retard .
I refered you to see the source of my images so you realise that i didn't copy any images from alexg thread because my source is different , i should have guessed this would be too sophisticated for a guy like you :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

my god you are dumb ...

they are the same pictures from the same source .... ( REUTERS : primary producer ) even if they were hosted on myspace, it still would be the same pictures ....

Problems with water in Israel ????

OK that's my last hint , you're making me tired ...
the source of the images i linked from is ynet.co.il
alexg source of information is ynetnews.com . this means i didn't know about his post before i posted this thread i wasn't talking about reuters at all , but the news site that published this .

There is plenty of smoke in both of them. Idiot.

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh
don't think they serve water in Israel.. only alcohol.. that'sh why they always shound sho drunk :helpme

thats fucked up

You guys look so sweet together , you and directfiesta .
should we all leave the board and give you 10 minutes to be alone ? i assure you no one will peep you :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

cheap eye lens ? or lack of brain ?
please reveal :1orglaugh

oh i was expecting international relations to fall, but they are both nothingness.

please forgive him cos he's drunk vision is blurry he no not know what he shays :smokin

This is not the point you moron!


THE POINT IS:

REUTERS, a network that most of us always trusted most of the time, CAN'T BE TRUSTED NO MORE...


and we should always think twice, before trusting any other network as well

Why post a screwed up copy of an otherwise good photo?

cos reuters brushed up a photo so Israel could look better maybe the intentions was to makeIsrael look even a bit more powerful than it is armed with U.S. made bombs now they can't be trusted nomore? Ok, no prob we'll just watch BBC instead or all other medias.. don't think any other would be trying to help Israel thou :1orglaugh

Do you have a real news source for this info? Its like saying its true Matt Drudge said it lol

who cares, the city is bombed to the middle ages