2257 compliant?
 

Is this image, a recent cover of BabyTalk magazine, 2257 compliant?

http://i.a.cnn.net/cnn/2006/US/07/27...feeding.ap.jpg

Yes it is. It's not nudity. The baby is kissing an arm.

That ain't an arm.

LOL @ "arm"..

Yeah man, the hypocrisy of biblethumping and vote-fishing.. :disgust

it's not a genital though either...

I can't believe how most people consider a boob to be a sex organ.

some may consider that sexaully explicit if they are into that. So I would say yes :1orglaugh

Well no, it's not sexually explicit - except maybe to some as DatingGold suggests.
But are bare tits still OK then? Who thinks it won't put people at risk of record inspections later on, for displaying those evil hooters..? :winkwink:

Well no, it's not sexually explicit - except maybe to some as DatingGold suggests.
But are bare tits still OK then? Who thinks it won't put people at risk of record inspections later on, for displaying those evil hooters..? :winkwink:

Damn doubleposts..

What wrong with a baby kissing his moms ass?

If any FBI agent dares ask for record-keeping crap on that - he needs sacking. He's got no sense of humor.

I have 3 testicles

I'd like the one you're keeping in a jar next to your bed back, please.

Did you take the picture? No? I thought so.