![]()  | 
	
		
 C-Span Airing Of L.A. Conference Shows Mainstreaming Of 9/11 Truth 
		
		
		http://www.infowars.com/articles/sep...nstreaming.htm 
	A decision that many of us were waiting on with baited breath - C-Span's scheduling of the American Scholars Symposium highlights - infuses the 9/11 truth movement with a fresh injection of credibility and exposure to more mainstream audiences. The panel features incredible presentations by 9/11 Scholars for Truth founder James Fetzer, BYU Physics Professor Steven Jones, President of the Institute for Space and Security Studies Dr. Robert M. Bowman, Lt. Col., USAF, ret., Filmmaker and Radio Broadcaster Alex Jones, and Terrorism Expert Webster Tarpley. C-Span viewers will witness what many consider to be the most hard hitting conference to date including the most professional and credible speakers ever assembled. Many have expressed a degree of frustration that some quarters of the 9/11 truth movement are not as bold in their stance when drawing conclusions about 9/11 evidence as is necessary to make an impact. The American Scholars Symposium was crystal clear in its summation that 9/11 represents an inside job carried out by criminal elements within the US government. The deliberate implosion of the twin towers and Building 7 allied with the reversal of routine air defense procedures leave no other explanation than the fact that the attack was a self-inflicted wound. Preaching to the choir is a method best left in the past and the C-Span airing is a positive step towards reaching out and educating those who remain in the dark about the staggering volume of evidence which clearly indicates that the official story behind 9/11 is a fraud. The distinction, background and high esteem of the speakers at the conference, coupled with C-Span's notable reputation as a bellwether of the mainstream body politic, provides for a perfect symbiosis to advance the credibility and critical acclaim of the 9/11 truth movement as something far weightier and more influential than a cadre of conspiracy theorists - a label still peddled by fading elements of the blowhard establishment press. It is crucial that everyone see this historic panel discussion on C-SPAN. Tell your friends and family, email colleagues, and post links on message boards. This is an incredible step in spreading the word about the truth about 9/11. It is vital that you focus your educational efforts solely on those who are still unaware of cover-up pertaining to 9/11. The program will air on C-SPAN 1 at 8PM EST (7PM CST) on Saturday, July 29th and then air again for the West Coast at 11pm EST (10pm CST). You can watch the program online at the times stated above by clicking here.  | 
		
 oh you silly, silly man. Shall I run down the list of people involved in the 9/11 truth movement? 
	Lets start with Steven Jones, the physics professor from BYU who's demolition theory is central to the movement. Here is the official statement from BYU on his published paper: ""The university is aware that Professor Steven Jones's hypotheses and interpretations of evidence regarding the collapse of World Trade Center buildings are being questioned by a number of scholars and practitioners, including many of BYU's own faculty. Professor Jones' department and college administrators are not convinced that his analyses and hypotheses have been submitted to relevant scientific venues that would ensure rigorous technical peer review." The Fulton College of Engineering and Technology department has also added, "The structural engineering faculty in the Fulton College of Engineering and Technology do not support the hypotheses of Professor Jones." So, he may be able to convince a bunch of 9/11 conspiracy buffs, but he can't win over any of his colleagues. Laughable. I can go on - each and every person who 'headlines' the 9/11 truth movement falls into one of these categories: 1) A sociopath 2) A Liar 3) A religious zealot 4) Directly profits from the sale of "9/11 truth' related media (books, video)  | 
		
 :sleep :sleep :sleep :sleep :sleep :sleep :sleep :sleep :sleep :sleep :sleep :sleep 
	 | 
		
 you're pathetic 
	 | 
		
 Seriously, im NOT a conspiracy nut, and the facts surrounding 9-11 seem VERY QUESTIONABLE to me. 
	Im not convinced the conspiracy theories are right, but I sure as hell am smart enough not to trust the government. All the elements are there, motive and established and verified links between people and orginizations involved, at the least looks very suspicious. Lets remember the big point, one that cant be argued, one thats been overlooked by the mainstream press even though its right in our faces... THE WTC TOWERS COLLAPSED AT FREEFALL SPEED. The government claimed it was one floor crashing onto the next, but with NO RESISTANCE??? This is literally physically impossable unless floors were being demolished as the building was coming down - tons of steel and concrete cannot instantly break apart, period. Thats what would have needed to happen for the governments story to be true.  | 
		
 Quote: 
	
 thats an interesting way to debate. Belittle someone for speaking their opinion. I guess I wont be promoting Python anytime soon, through my sites. Well done Steve  | 
		
 Quote: 
	
  | 
		
  | 
		
  | 
| All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:59 PM. | 
	Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
	
	©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123