GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   My take on HR 4472 (after actually reading the whole bill) (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=637381)

Quick Buck 07-25-2006 05:23 PM

My take on HR 4472 (after actually reading the whole bill)
 
This is what a good lobbyist gets you. It specifically excludes tv & movie studios who are "governed by the fcc".

Quote:

Originally Posted by thomas.loc.gov
`(h)(1) The provisions of this section and section 2257 shall not apply to matter, or any image therein, containing one or more visual depictions of simulated sexually explicit conduct, or actual sexually explicit conduct as described in clause (v) of section 2256(2)(A), if such matter--
`(A)(i) is intended for commercial distribution;
`(ii) is created as a part of a commercial enterprise by a person who certifies to the Attorney General that such person regularly and in the normal course of business collects and maintains individually identifiable information regarding all performers, including minor performers, employed by that person, pursuant to Federal and State tax, labor, and other laws, labor agreements, or otherwise pursuant to industry standards, where such information includes the name, address, and date of birth of the performer; and
`(iii) is not produced, marketed or made available by the person described in clause (ii) to another in circumstances such than an ordinary person would conclude that the matter contains a visual depiction that is child pornography as defined in section 2256(8); or
`(B)(i) is subject to the authority and regulation of the Federal Communications Commission acting in its capacity to enforce section 1464 of this title, regarding the broadcast of obscene, indecent or profane programming; and
`(ii) is created as a part of a commercial enterprise by a person who certifies to the Attorney General that such person regularly and in the normal course of business collects and maintains individually identifiable information regarding all performers, including minor performers, employed by that person, pursuant to Federal and State tax, labor, and other laws, labor agreements, or otherwise pursuant to industry standards, where such information includes the name, address, and date of birth of the performer.


baddog 07-25-2006 05:26 PM

$$$ talks

fusionx 07-25-2006 05:40 PM

Doesn't (h)(1) (A)(iii) let people off the hook if the "matter" is obviously not child porn, and they can certify that they maintain records or positive ID including date of birth?

What am I missing here?

(h)(1) specifically says "The provisions of this section and section 2257 shall not apply to matter ... "

fusionx 07-25-2006 05:57 PM

Never mind - read the rest of that section in the text of the bill:

3 ?(2) Nothing in subparagraphs (A) and (B) of para-
4 graph (1) shall be construed to exempt any matter that con-
5 tains any visual depiction that is child pornography, as
6 defined in section 2256(8), or is actual sexually explicit
7 conduct within the definitions in clauses (i) through (iv)
8 of section 2256(2)(A).

tony286 07-25-2006 06:04 PM

what are the lobbists we have with FSC doing ? Sleeping on the job?

DatingGold 07-25-2006 06:05 PM

http://www.acesblog.com/gfy/jackoff.jpg

seeric 07-25-2006 06:21 PM

when we start launching paysites that net 120 million dollars at the box office, errrrr i mean processors, in the first weekend, then they'll start cutting us some breaks.

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh

you are correct though. even though the movie studios compete like savage dogs, they have organization, and unions, and lobbyists. sadly, getting webmasters to unite is like herding cats. some say it can never be done.

divided we fall.

:2 cents:

Kimo 07-25-2006 07:09 PM

webmasters unite!


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:39 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123