![]() |
My take on HR 4472 (after actually reading the whole bill)
This is what a good lobbyist gets you. It specifically excludes tv & movie studios who are "governed by the fcc".
Quote:
|
$$$ talks
|
Doesn't (h)(1) (A)(iii) let people off the hook if the "matter" is obviously not child porn, and they can certify that they maintain records or positive ID including date of birth?
What am I missing here? (h)(1) specifically says "The provisions of this section and section 2257 shall not apply to matter ... " |
Never mind - read the rest of that section in the text of the bill:
3 ?(2) Nothing in subparagraphs (A) and (B) of para- 4 graph (1) shall be construed to exempt any matter that con- 5 tains any visual depiction that is child pornography, as 6 defined in section 2256(8), or is actual sexually explicit 7 conduct within the definitions in clauses (i) through (iv) 8 of section 2256(2)(A). |
what are the lobbists we have with FSC doing ? Sleeping on the job?
|
|
when we start launching paysites that net 120 million dollars at the box office, errrrr i mean processors, in the first weekend, then they'll start cutting us some breaks.
:1orglaugh :1orglaugh you are correct though. even though the movie studios compete like savage dogs, they have organization, and unions, and lobbyists. sadly, getting webmasters to unite is like herding cats. some say it can never be done. divided we fall. :2 cents: |
webmasters unite!
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:39 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123