What should be done about the killing of innocent people in war?

**Deputy Chief Command** · 07-20-2006, 11:10 AM

hahhaahaha , only an idiot can say things like that / / agree with things like that

nuff said

**Murderous** · 07-20-2006, 11:10 AM

That sucks, but what CAN we do?

**Danid0llface** · 07-20-2006, 11:11 AM

nothing at all.

**Sly** · 07-20-2006, 11:13 AM

Originally posted by Deputy Chief Command

hahhaahaha , only an idiot can say things like that / / agree with things like that

nuff said

You can't call someone else an idiot without either sharing your views or explaining why their views are "wrong" about being an idiot yourself.

**Ace_luffy** · 07-20-2006, 11:21 AM

nothing at all.... maybe they need some coffee drink....

**Fetish Gimp** · 07-20-2006, 11:26 AM

"The Fountainhead" is an overrated piece of shit.

**Doctor Dre** · 07-20-2006, 11:27 AM

This might apply to the US one day so you might not wanna laugh too hard.

**potter** · 07-20-2006, 11:30 AM

War. Without innocent lives lost. Hmmm. Let me email God real quick and see when the beta for "Perfect World v1.01b" is going to be released.

**JFK** · 07-20-2006, 11:46 AM

cant we all just get along ? I know its too, Too much, to ask ..............

**Mike AI** · 07-20-2006, 11:50 AM

Deputy Chief I have read some of your posts, you strike me as an anti-semite? Is this accurate?

Tell us about yourself. Where are you from? What is your heritage? Where do you live now?

**MrJackMeHoff** · 07-20-2006, 11:50 AM

I think they should start killing the witnesses...

**dunefield** · 07-20-2006, 11:51 AM

**giftedtwisted** · 07-20-2006, 11:56 AM

Originally posted by potter

War. Without innocent lives lost. Hmmm. Let me email God real quick and see when the beta for "Perfect World v1.01b" is going to be released.

hahaha

Nuff said right there.

**directfiesta** · 07-20-2006, 11:58 AM

Originally posted by Mike AI

Q: What should be done about the killing of innocent people in war?

AR: This is a major reason people should be concerned about the nature of their government. If by neglect, ignorance, or helplessness, they couldn't overturn their bad government and choose a better one, then they have to pay the price for the sins of their government?as all of us are paying for the sins of ours.

That's why we have to be interested in the philosophy of government and in seeing, to the extent we can, that we have a good government. A government is not an independent entity: it's supposed to represent the people of a nation.

If some people put up with dictatorship?as some do in Soviet Russia and as they did in Germany?they deserve whatever their government deserves.

The only thing to be concerned with is: who started that war? And once you can establish that it is a given country, there is no such thing as consideration for the "rights" of that country, because it has initiated the use of force, and therefore stepped outside the principle of rights.

http://www.aynrand.org/site/PageServ...ian_casualties

This applies to Lebonese, Iraqies and Palistinians.

How about the USA for Iraq ... Applies or not ?

**directfiesta** · 07-20-2006, 12:00 PM

Originally posted by Sly

You can't call someone else an idiot without either sharing your views or explaining why their views are "wrong" about being an idiot yourself.

It is done at every thread that doesn't please a group ....

http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showthread.php?t=635454

probably a modus operandi ....

**Libertine** · 07-20-2006, 12:06 PM

Originally posted by Sly

You can't call someone else an idiot without either sharing your views or explaining why their views are "wrong" about being an idiot yourself.

Some ideas are too stupid and ridiculous to even reason against. This is one of those ideas.

However, for the sake of those who don't understand why, allow me to explain.

This little piece of dribble assumes "the people" of a country to be a single, coherent entity. Obviously, that is pure rubbish. Different people have different views, and blaming them for the views and votes of others, even if those are the majority, is ridiculous. Otherwise, one would have to hold dissidents and opposition responsible for the actions of the very regime they fight against - a completely unreasonable idea.

Moreover, even those who may have voted for a specific government may not agree with all its actions. Lack of insight in hidden goals of a particular party does not make one responsible for those hidden goals when they eventually become clear.

Ayn Rand is a simpleminded twat.

**RayVega** · 07-20-2006, 12:18 PM

There are no innocent people killed, there is however "collateral damage" and i guess we can live with that right?

**carol.prime** · 07-20-2006, 12:19 PM

The cannon thunders... limbs fly in all directions... one can hear the groans of victims and the howling of those performing the sacrifice... it's Humanity in search of happiness. --- Charles Baudelaire

This is really a very sickening thought about war. What should be done about the killing of innocent people in war? There's nothing much we can do but hope that they must be spared from such circumstance. I don't know either if those warfreak countries has a bleeding heart for its own people!

**Magix** · 07-20-2006, 12:23 PM

Originally posted by potter

War. Without innocent lives lost. Hmmm. Let me email God real quick and see when the beta for "Perfect World v1.01b" is going to be released.

LOL LOL

What should be done about the killing of innocent people in war?

What should be done about the killing of innocent people in war?

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment