Syria Supports Lebanon Against the Barbaric Israelis
 

Oh shit, this is getting so bad. WWW III has begun.

Thank the devil I have a 23 yo horny grad student moving in with me tomorrow.

I get to fuck as much as I can before the world is blown up.

What's was his undergrad?

Israel has the strongest army in the world, and its big brother is the USA.

Hezbollah is gonna get a asswuppin'.

true true... get the popcorn ready

Well Hezbollah has Iran.

This was the last paragraph of a very interesting article on MSNBCdotcom....

In Israel, we heard repeatedly that this is the first phase of the next war and that ithahaha8217;s about more than Hamas and Hizbullah, ithahaha8217;s about Syria and Iran, and stopping an Iranian nuclear weapon program. Therehahaha8217;s a growing realization in Israel that given Bushhahaha8217;s domestic weakness, this may require a unilateral Israeli strike. We were told the only thing that frightens Israel more is no one doing it.

Simple people say simple things. Boy, are you simple.

Lyn

You are all infidel dogs.

Black Spongebob says:

http://i1.tinypic.com/1zzhqxg.jpg

Suprising coming from you DH :winkwink:

Here's some facts - give or take a few 1000 either way...


THE WORLD'S TEN LARGEST ARMIES

1. China - 1,700,000
2. India - 1,200,000
3. North Korea - 900,000
4. South Korea - 560,000
5. Pakistan - 520,000
6. United States - 475,000
7. Iraq - 360,000 - Pre-2003, of course.
8. Myanmar - 325,000
9. Russia - 320,000
10. Iran - 320,000

THE WORLD'S LARGEST AIR FORCES - BY NUMBER OF COMBAT AIRCRAFT

1. Russia - 3,996
2. China - 3,520
3. United States - 2,598
4. India - 774
5. Taiwan - 598
6. North Korea - 593
7. Egypt - 583
8. France - 531
9. Ukraine - 521
10. South Korea - 488


THE WORLD'S LARGEST NAVIES - BY PERSONNEL

1. United States - 369,800
2. China - 230,000
3. Russia - 171,500
4. Taiwan - 68,000
5. France - 62,600
6. South Korea - 60,000
7. India - 53,000
8. Turkey - 51,000
9. Indonesia - 47,000
10. North Korea - 46,000

Never noticed Israel among the top ten...

Never noticed that he said the "largest".

Ever wonder what we shall do when we get tired of killing people who live in other countries? Probably a good thing we don't slaughter them all at once..

so what makes them "the best".. kosher meals?

And how does the Iraqi army rate now? Isn't this telling of just how effective a large army is with antique equipment?

that's worked really well for the US in Iraq.

Israel does NOT have the strongest army, U.S. certainly does not have the most largest army, but they have the most advanced army, much better then the North Korean and Chinese armies. They use outdated weapons, even though they have a large army.

You noticed. Iraq Army defeated in three weeks, and government overthrown in the same period. Yes it worked really well.

I'm surprised the British Royal Air Force or their Navy isn't in there. Weird..

Israel does have the storngest Army in the Mid East as has been demonstrated five times, up to this point. The US has the largest technological advanced Army on the earth.

Very well led, well trained, motivated, and state of the art equipment.

Iraq had alot of Russia's finest equipment, were trained by the Russian's and used Russian tactics, so they did not exactly have antique equipment.

Yeah, I don't think so. For sake of argument though, if they weren't using antique equipment when they had equipment at all, why exactly did they get rolled over in 3 weeks time?

:thumbsup

China and India have THE most modern air force thanks to Russian Sukhoi that will smoke US airforce on any given day

and others a not very well trained, trained and motivated... what ever dude... Nice argument... BT, says who? you?

Interesting times we live in for sure

you shitting me? Iraq had 1970 equipment from Iran-Iraq war.. T-55 tanks.. who you kidding :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh Modern equipment... T-55. First introduced in 1949.

Nah U.S. will win, hard to hit a stealth fighter

http://hqinet001.hqmc.usmc.mil/p&r/c...GES/JSF-03.JPG

china has the "most feared" army

As of 2004 this was agreed upon ranking of the worlds Militaries.
Top Ten Armies of the World
According to the CIA and other Intelligence Services (European, Asian, African) this is the tally - based on a Combination of Manpower, Technology, Firepower, Training, Resources, Available Reserves, and Nuclear Potential (Current or Likely):
1. USA
2. China
3. Germany
4. India
5. France
6. Russia
7. UK
8. Italy
9. Israel
10. Pakistan

http://www.cnn.com/WORLD/asiapcf/990...ary/index.html

If you were smart enough and did a little bit of research you would have known that those 5th generation fighters are not even in production due to multiple failures? Even you link says it?s a CONCEPT !!!! :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

Ya I know it's a concept thats coming out very soon

Let's see, do other countries have B-2 Bombers?

I don't think sooooooo

An air force only matters if you could put planes over another countries airspace or are defending your own. Neither China nor India could put aircraft over the mainland US at any scale and the US won't be flying over either one anytime soon. Ergo, the craft doesn't matter much.

Neutral airspace, I'll stack my F-22 Raptor against any Sukhoi, anyday.

remind me how long it took F-22 raptor to come "soon"??? How soon is NOW?
:1orglaugh :1orglaugh

This option illustrates the cost implications of such a force-structure mix by replacing Air Force purchases of manned F-35 aircraft (also known as the Joint Strike Fighter) on a one-for-one basis with UCAVs. The Air Force is currently scheduled to increase annual production of F-35s from six planes in 2007 to 110 by 2014. This option assumes that the Air Force would reduce F-35 production to a peak rate of only 88 planes per year and purchase UCAVs instead. Thus, this option would replace 56 Air Force F-35s with a like number of UCAVs over the 2006-2015 period and would ultimately replace 298 of the 1,763 F-35s planned for the Air Force through 2027. The Congressional Budget Office assumed that UCAVs would begin replacing F-35s at a rate of four in 2012, eight in 2013, and 22 per year thereafter. (The option also assumes that an additional 20 UCAVs per year would be bought for other missions, but their costs are not included in the table above.)

http://www.cbo.gov/bo2005/bo2005_sho...m?index=050-17

Bombers need support to drop those bombs... you know? otherwise they get shut down by fighter jets.

We already dominate the skys with the current planes we have, but once the F-35 shows up in town, it makes everything else obsolete

*sigh*

Its low-observable, or "stealth," characteristics give it the unique ability to penetrate an enemy's most sophisticated defenses and threaten its most valued, and heavily defended, targets. Its capability to penetrate air defenses and threaten effective retaliation provides a strong, effective deterrent and combat force well into the 21st century.

The revolutionary blending of low-observable technologies with high aerodynamic efficiency and large payload gives the B-2 important advantages over existing bombers. Its low-observability provides it greater freedom of action at high altitudes, thus increasing its range and a better field of view for the aircraft's sensors. Its unrefueled range is approximately 6,000 nautical miles (9,600 kilometers).

The B-2's low observability is derived from a combination of reduced infrared, acoustic, electromagnetic, visual and radar signatures. These signatures make it difficult for the sophisticated defensive systems to detect, track and engage the B-2. Many aspects of the low-observability process remain classified; however, the B-2's composite materials, special coatings and flying-wing design all contribute to its "stealthiness."

http://www.danshistory.com/b2weapsb.jpg

Kinda sucks because there aren?t much F-22s out there because they cost way too much, have inferior equipment and tend to crash? Su-47 makes F-22 looks like a cheap hooker in South Central LA.. And its in mass production unlike F-22
https://youtube.com/watch?v=UHbj_wC6r3k

And btw there are 24 of these(thats all you need):)

They cost 2 billion dollars each and are flown by the most highly trained pilots, not just any average joe from the air force can fly this

You failed to mention that not only did the US defeat Iraq and remove it's government in three weeks, but that they did so with less than one thousand US dead. That's stunning.

And also since America has the most Carriers, they get to use the most fighter planes, F-18, F-14.

And theres alot of them.

stick with porn...
http://www.csmonitor.com/2005/1128/p01s04-wosc.html

And they are inferior to Su-47.. great point you?re making there..
And yes, Su-47 are flown by high school kids..
please continue © Jules

OK... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stealth_bomber



so your point is????

Big deal?

A newer aircraft such as the Sukhoi should be better than the F-16

The F-16A first took flight in December 1976

How bout we compare newer the Sukhoi with F-22 or F-35?

My point is you can't shoot them down, cuz they fly high and you can't see them on radar

Much of their Army and equipment was destroyed in the 1st Gulf War (during the six week air assault and 100 hour ground war), in addition Russia's finest was not as good as America's finest, also the Iraqi's did not have the will to fight, and were very poorly led.

Stick with "selective quotes"...