Judge Orders Man's Penis To Be Monitored
 

Ok, this is just weird. I mean, really. How in the hell do they come up with these things?

Sure the guy is obviously a piece of crap, and did have CP, but putting censors on his penis? Either let him out of prison or keep him in there. I seriously can't see how monitoring his penis would serve any purpose?

The ruling was just overturned.

Personally, just having an electronic device placed on my groin would probably be enough to "trigger a response", hahaha.

http://www.courttv.com/news/2006/062..._tests_ap.html

hahahaha sucks to be him!, does it give him an electric shock too?

Not knowing all the circumstances , cant say its a bad thing , but Welcome to Big Brother:2 cents:

now that would be funny. :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

Clockwork Orange

Fuck!! :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

That sucks, im sure for most guys that thing would be going off about ever 10 minutes.

How many errections the average male get while he sleeps. Forget, but several.

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh

I see no problem with this. I monitor my husbands all the time.

WOW!!! I'd hate to be that guy. Tho why did they overturn the ruling?
XOXOXOX,
JJ:winkwink:

My guess is this falls under that "unusual punishment" clause in the constitution.

Everyime it gets hard I guess.. :1orglaugh


Now, that I just can't imagine...

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh Great reply!

Damn..now I've heard everything..that's a first

more brilliance from the illiterate, headline skimming fools and stupid reactions from a misleading headline that ironically, was constructed in hopes of inspiring you to actually read the article.
:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

Gee, I dont know, maybe this had something to do with it:

http://www.archives.gov/education/le...itution-01.gif

Wow.
 

All that I can say is Bad day for him.
JJ:)

willy erection

What were they going to do, show him CP? It's illegal for the govt. to commit crimes in order to prevent crimes.