![]() |
Operators of commercial websites with sexually explicit content would have to post wa
"Operators of commercial websites with sexually explicit content would have to post warning labels on each offending page or face imprisonment under a new proposal in the US Senate.
Caving in to earlier demands from the US Department of Justice, the 24-page proposed law focuses on a medley of new penalties related to child pornography and other sexual content on the internet. For instance, ISPs that fail to report to authorities any sightings of child pornography on their networks would have to cough up fines that are triple those written into current law: $150,000 for the first violation and $300,000 thereafter." http://management.silicon.com/govern...9159571,00.htm Another useless step from the point of child porn prevention and killing step for porn industry |
repost i think, search topics before you post
// like anyone would do that .... but still |
I did,but the GFY search was down,as it happens often
|
I'm so fucking sick of hearing about god damn children I could scream.
Apparently EVERYONE in the world is responsible for them, except the actual breeders that brought them here in the first place...... http://www.gaymainstreet.com/TheStre...deadhorse2.gif |
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:35 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123