![]() |
England have squeaked through with a 2-0 victory
What a fucking game wow
|
After like 20 something shots to the goal they scored few times, Nice.......
|
we sucked..the first goal felt so good for the wrong reasons but we are still there.
|
Quote:
|
3 points for a win :thumbsup
|
lucky fukers ah!! :(
cheers tony |
lol ....
|
lucky England
|
I knew they'd pull through
|
I think England suck. I need to know a decent Basketball team so that I can support them.
|
go england go!
|
A team to beat?
|
We where awful in the first half, we only started to play in the second half when Rooney and Lennon came on, also Downing played pretty well when he came on also.
The problem with England is, they are far too predictable. We didn't perform in midfield and link up the attack, we needed a player or 2 that was going to beat 1 or 2 players and create an opportunity. Lampard was awful and gerrard just doesn't play well in the holding role Based on our second half performance I think its obvious that changes need to be made, bold changes as well. I'd like to see nearly an entirely different midfield for the Sweden game. I want to see downing on the left wing (because joe cole was poor today & has a bigger impact as a sub anyway) I'd also like to see Beckham dropped in favor of Lennon on the right wing And in the center I would like to see carrick playing the holding midfield role for england and that would give gerrard the license to push more up the pitch like he goes for liverpool (scoring 20+ goals a season for em) Then in attack I'd like to see Rooney start (if he is fit) and I'd like to see Wallcott given a start so we can see what he can do. If hes not playing well in the first half we then can bring Owen on in the second half Bottom line England are too too predictable with the current team because there is no one in the side that can beat a few players, put Downing, Lennon, Rooney and Wallcott on and we can rip teams apart with shear pace ! |
Quote:
|
That was an amazing last 15 minutes...:thumbsup
|
Was a good game ..Go Brazil
|
Was a good game ..Go Brazil
|
Was a good game ..Go Brazil
|
Was a good game ..Go Brazil
|
Was a good game ..Go Brazil
|
Was a good game ..Go Brazil
|
Quote:
|
well we got the right result in the end :)
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
In the first half he wasn't playing as a target man, he was dropping deep and defending which is kinda stupid because he needs to be upfront winning headers and putting them in Owens direction. Also he runs about like a headless chicken at times, hes not a quality center forward, the guy doesn't have the natural instinct to get into the goal scoring positions at the right time (like Robbie Fowler has) it always takes Crouch at least 5 chances to score a goal. Also for a guy who is 6ft8 he should be winning nearly all the headers, but hes not prolific in the air. Fans will forget all this though, since he scored the first goal against T&T - I still think he useless though |
Quote:
|
Trinidad is surprisingly good!
|
Quote:
On the other hand, Gerrard was playing the holding midfield role for england. He gets ONE chance and tucks it away. Lampard had about 4 decent chances and missed them all !! You can't do that at international level. Thats why I'd like to see Gerrard playing the attacking midfield role in the next match for england and Carrick playing the holding role for england which is his natural position !! Lampard and Gerrard do NOT play well together for england, they play the same position and do NOT complement each other well. When it comes push to shove I'd rather have Gerrard in the england team than Lampard |
T&T could still get through..would be fun if they did
|
Quote:
Besides if England had a decent manager Lampard and Gerrard would deffinately play well together. Either he should play 4-5-1 (with 2 wingers, a holding midfielder and Lamps and Steve in the center) or play attacking 4-4-2, not this boring midfield defensive struggle crap |
England got lucky...lets be honest...
|
luck is a large part of winning anything like this
|
Quote:
You are forgetting though, Gerrard was playing the holding role for England in that game, it wasn't his job to go forward. Plus Gerrard didn't have much options other than to hoof the ball 40 yards because the entire england midfield played piss poor. No one ran into space in midfield to create chances, no one tried to link up the midfield with attack which limited us to long balls for the first 60 minutes. You say Lamard created many chances, but in the first 60 odd minutes we created very little. Thats why I think the entire midfield needs to be changed, because the current system just isn't working Its boring and predictable ! Quote:
I agree with your tactics also, with a 4-5-1 (with 2 wingers, a holding midfielder and Lamps and Steve in the center) it means both Lamps and Gerrard can play their attacking football, Carrick can play the holding midfield role and we can have Owen or Rooney up front which will create more chances |
and next time, england, dont let your crouch play like a little 6 years old girl.
https://youtube.com/watch?v=JURU3iFmRxs foul :P |
| All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:01 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123