Paul McCartney's soon to be ex wife did porn
 

this thread is pointless without pics!

click on the link a bunch of pics

"Now 38 and mum to Sir Paul?s two-year-old Beatrice, she stopped at very little when she took part in the revolting snaps for Die Freuden Der Liebe ? The Joys Of Love.

The filthy volume features 112 pages filled with pictures ? and contains NO accompanying words."

LOL @ emphasis on lack of dialogue in the porn shoot

HEATHERMCCARTNEYPORN.COM is available!

I'd register it myself but I doubt anyone is going to spell all of that correctly for a type-in

Does not sound like she did hardcore...

lol good luck on that then. :)

"One shot shows Heather naked and smothered in baby oil as she performs a sex act on a nude male porn star. The curly-haired man is then photographed performing an act on her with the help of a sex toy.

In other shots Heather appears to act out bondage scenes with whips, handcuffs and edible underwear."


fuck yea :thumbsup

he got so played plain and simple

I'm beginning to think all models have some sort of porn past (published or not).

Damn, Paul was made a sucker :(

That's got to be the worst alleged "newspaper" in the UK Tony. :winkwink:

Got to agree with AmateurFlix on this one...

"revolting snaps" - "filthy volume" - "NO accompanying words" - that should get the Sun readers heading straight to the porn stores to buy a copy! :1orglaugh

Their sister newspaper - "The News of the World" is much the same. They tried a story on a model I knew - she never did porn in her life or even thought about it, tho did the usual topless stuff. Anyways, they carried a story about her working in a "massage parlor" in Central London. When we first saw this story in the press, we thought - shit, what's this secret life? :winkwink: Then it turns out that she had never been in London for many months (lived about 150 miles outside) and it's totally out of character. She was genuinely stunned and not a happy girl over this. There was a legal suit prepared and in the end the "newspaper" settled on the court steps for around 250K UK pounds ($500K) and she bought a home and got married to her longtime boyfriend with the proceeds. :)

Let's see what happens with Linda next! :1orglaugh

nice boobies

Woah! i never saw that one coming...

She actually looked pretty hot back in the day

I love it when a paper that features a naked or semi naked model every day gets on it's high horse about a model doing soft porn.

Hi Kettle this is Pot, you're black. :1orglaugh

Oups, owned ! Some nice boobies :)

Exactly Paul! :1orglaugh

Their whole circulation is based on sensationalism and "topless girls". It's even worth getting sued a few times to keep the circulation up :pimp

I'd fuck her anytime

Kool....:thumbsup!

My kind of girl:)

oh hot momma!!!

Got some big tits on her.

Such a fool, to marry her without a prenup at his wish ...

This is going to become so common in the next 10 years in all levels of public figures lives.

Who cares...

I love it even more when some of the wankers here get on their high horse about doing porn.

Who cares whether she did porn or not - we all do porn here!

Well - maybe there's a lot of wannabes here but I'm sure you get the picture :)

no shit! thats hot!

She was a hot model in her early years.

No kidding. I especially love when they go on about 16 year olds having sex or something and then their page three girl is barely 17.

Holy shit, you are joking me right?

What is it? Some men just see tits and think "wooah... boooobs" ... as if they're 12 years old again.

Those tits are just plain horrible. Saggy... large nipples... yuk yuk yuk ... :D

yeah, they look real

She does have some nice jugs

nice tits

Nice flap jack tities there.

haha... I assume you haven't seen many other people's tits then? If you think tits that haven't been enhanced all look like that, you are very much wrong. :1orglaugh

HAHAHA !! SO true :1orglaugh

is that the reason they divorce?
it is not fake?

mmmmmm jugs!!

just imagine - she has no legs now, but she used to be pornostar!

They do seem alittle floppy. Oh well. They're not that bad. :2 cents:

Amazingly even people who have been nude on film can have accidents and end up disabled. Even more amazingly, disabled people still have a sexuality.

well, having my own pair it may strike you as odd that I have seen tits. The point is that real tits aren't a uniform size or shape. In addition to once some people actually like big nipples.

I don't really care about her. I just have a personal campaign for peopel to know what real tits look like because I think we are now onto a whole generation of men that think tits are suppose to stick straight up in the air when you lay down.

Paul Leaked It I Bet!