RSS2Blog is going to get so much better.
 

I talked to the owner a couple weeks ago and made a request of her. After a little discussion she agreed to do it and beta test it on our servers. I am expecting it to be ready this week. You guys are going to love it. :thumbsup

Looking forward to it :)

What are the new options?

http://www.adultforum.ca/pics/baddog3.JPG

stfu old man winter

Well, let's get the test completed first, but I will say that it will be made blonde-proof.

we are helping to reinvent the wheel

Hmm how bout a (very small) hint as to the new stuff as I'm thinking of getting a fauxhawk with blonde highlights so I may need some time to prepare.

one click is good :thumbsup

http://www.vanguardspheres.com/gallery/files/1/easy.gif

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

Hah, that picture rocks.

which is cheaper? rss2blog or abp? :)

You guys are going to love the competition.

RSS2Blog is one license for unlimited domains. You can do the math as I don't know how big your network is.

Bring it, I'll eat your face.

Maybe as much competition as one of the hosting companies that is about to spread itself over more Class-C's than you? :thumbsup :thumbsup :thumbsup

*Sigh* Same old shibbles. This argument won't hold up much longer :)

I look forward to seeing whatever "this" is, if it's even remotely useful we've probably thought about it, and it's already in beta for a feature release, or planned for the next version. If not, it can be added within days depending on what "it" is. :1orglaugh

As I have said a number of times, they are different.
One posts out, one posts in, one isn't dynamic, one is.

I would recommend looking at the features of both. If you have any questions pop me a message (or mrkris) and I'd be glad to show you what ABP is capable of.

Competition is good.

cruel
ruthless
uncalled for





saved to hdd! :)

Stop picking on this poor old man!

:mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad:
:winkwink:

Is the only plus RSS2Blog has going for it, is it's unlimited domain pricing? That seems to be the biggest selling point they focus on anytime it's mentioned.

He's senile anyways, he most likely already forgot he saw the picture.

Not hardly, but I am not selling it. We looked at both and made our decision based on facts. I would suggest doing the same.

The only thing I have heard that ABP does that RSS2Blog doesn't is the ability to change the author's linking code to your own. This is not a feature that I would ever use and I can understand why it would piss someone off.

He is on ignore, and he knows it. He is just trying to get his postcount up.

subtle....

idiot.

Contradict yourself often?

Then you say ...

So ... Did you look at it or hear about it. You confuse me.

And you can't even mention 1 of them?

But you can mention 1 feature of ABP that RSS doesn't have.

I'm thinking your reason was just the cost. :2 cents:

well he needs to save his money dude..... adult diapers are expensive :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

That feature has been mentioned often enough that one doesn't need to visit their site to know it.

And yeah, with a network of sites as large as ours ABP would have to have a ton of features that RSS doesn't to justify the cost.

Quality over quantity. Have you once hit either Chio or myself up to ask about pricing? Sure, it will probably be more based on what your network size is, but there is a reason we have clients that are using multi-hundred licenses instead of using RSS2Blog, so we can't be TOO bad :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

PFFT! You're making too much sense. STFU NEWBIE! Such things are not allowed on GFY especially when baddog "the lord of the seo" is speaking!

goodgirl is the SEO pro on our team, I have never stated otherwise.

When you first posted you "Heard" this it was a lie, it was NOT possible so you lied, or someone told you a lie. Now with the new rewriter it can be done, but only if you're a rocket scientist with regular expressions.

It's something that I was against putting in, but the benefits of Rewriter being able to use regular expressions far outweigh it's possible missuse.

Autoblogger Pro is a tool, like any tool it can be used in ways not intended by it's producer.

Should we not buy hammers, because we could potentially kill someone with one.

I did not say or imply that this feature was available when we were first looking at which script to purchase.

I read your post before the feature was changed. You said you "heard" it could do that then. It couldn't.

Read what I wrote again. I didn't say anything about what you chose, or when, simply that what you said, when you said it, was a lie.

Should I search for the post?

correct, baddog is the "lord of the middle-man"

I guess so, since I don't know what you are talking about.

If I said I heard it before it because a reality are you suggesting that I can foretell the future?

Listen Dysentery, we are a team. We have our assigned tasks. We have no middle-men.

I look forward to you letting the shit spew from your mouth in a few days.

English much? Two shakes.

Ok Baddouche, i'm curious as to what you mean by this comment. Sounds like a threat to me.

I've seen his face, and no offense to baddog but I've never been that hungry.

You are a very sick and demented individual.

I'm with you on this one.
That feature definitely pisses me off and I wish Chio would just get rid of it altogether.
ABP worked just fine without that. Doing it this way is the equivalent of selling a photo or video editing program that will remove the copyright holder's watermark from the pics or movies.

We bitch all the time in this industry that surfers get everything for free and that sites like Fusker steal our shit and let surfers get it all for free....but then we create software for webmasters to use that promotes theft from other webmasters, so that they won't have to do the work of creating their own text content.

Kind of fucked up.

I happened to be one of the first batch of users to test ABP and so far it has benefited me in many ways. I ended up purchasing 10 licenses and have been doing fine with it. Hell, I am content with the very first version of ABP. I don't have the time to play around with so many features that the latest version of abp comes with. :thumbsup

YARGH! D. is old school ABP. Doing quite well on google I might add :1orglaugh

Don't worry D. I won't give it away.

PS Baddog you have way too much time on your hands. The search only goes back to 500 of your posts which isn't nearly enough as you seem to post that in a day.

I'll hit texas dreams up to use his super mod skills to find the post in question.

Out for now.

AHOY!

thanks :thumbsup

As I said to you in ICQ I am trying to come up with a compromise for the feature because from the beginning I wanted to make sure ABP was used properly, and due credit was given.

I haven't even bought it yet, but I don't think you should cripple it on purpose. It'd be a can of worms I think. You'll end up chasing a long line of things someone MIGHT potentially do with it. It should remain as a testament to how powerful and flexible it's feature set is.

That's the exact argument for keeping it. It's a very powerful feature, and it would be a waste to remove it, or disable it because someone, somewhere may use it to change links.

Sure I understand where you're coming from, and I'm just lobbying you publicly and privately to not sell software that makes it easy for people to plagiarize us without giving us credit and leaving our links intact.

Something you could do for starters is leave the default "Original Article syndicated via RSS from SITE NAME" and leave SITE NAME linked to the original site.
I'm sure there's a way you could code that in and not let someone remove it without having to remove the feed altogether.
That's the "very least" you could do.

:2 cents: