webmaster who don't use nats prorgrams

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • bigdog
    Confirmed User
    • Jul 2001
    • 6964

    #1

    webmaster who don't use nats prorgrams

    How many webmasters acutally won't use a program because they use nats?
  • xLaborJames
    Confirmed User
    • Apr 2006
    • 564

    #2
    I push traffic on a program to program basis and it really depends on other things besides nats or mpa3 usage for me such as payout, niches, quality of content...
    xLabor.com Your one stop shop for WP Blog Themes, Custom Designs, and Content Insertion.

    Contact me to discuss all your blogging needs! James AT xlabor.com | 216 787 969

    Comment

    • Johny Traffic
      Confirmed User
      • Apr 2003
      • 5461

      #3
      I dont, but will use MPA3 at a push, still prefere ccbill handeling my cheques, especially from smaller programs.


      hosted flv's, hosted galleries, morphing rss feeds, free content, free sites, hosted blog

      Comment

      • Paul
        Confirmed User
        • Nov 2002
        • 2637

        #4
        I only push 1 nats program, I'm not really a fan of getting a whole load of checks each week. I find it a pain in the ass trying to keep track of them all.

        Comment

        • MaddCaz
          Confirmed User
          • Mar 2006
          • 9483

          #5
          I need to push NATS

          BigCocks.com -
          MatureWomen.com -
          Tranny.com -
          DrunkGirls.com -
          TeenGirls.com -
          MonsterCock.com and
          many more... Click
          here to see them all!

          Comment

          • Nasty
            Confirmed User
            • Aug 2002
            • 1575

            #6
            Originally posted by bigdog
            How many webmasters acutally won't use a program because they use nats?
            With the exception of reality cash, I have not had any luck with programs using nats, I have had several programs go from ccbill to nats and have watched my conversions go from 1/500-600 to 1/5000-6000. I had one of them go from 1/500 to 1/8000, I had so many free sites for that particular program that I just switched back to ccbill code and its now averaging around 1/1000.

            I dont push a program based on what software they use but I no longer push many nats sponsors. if a program switches to nats and leaves the ccbill links active, I just continue promoting via ccbill, if a program switches to nats and asks me to swtich my links, I just delete their free sites and galleries and move on.

            “Ours is a world of nuclear giants and ethical infants. We know more about war than we know about peace, more about killing than we know about living. If we continue to develop our technology without wisdom or prudence, our servant may prove to be our executioner.” ― Omar Bradley (1948)

            Comment

            • jayeff
              Confirmed User
              • May 2001
              • 2944

              #7
              Not all sponsors using CCBill get it right, but because they have to design their own affiliate interfaces, many of their sites are usable. NATS provides an interface, and most of its users go with it as is, but while the default NATS interface is fine for simple link collection, especially with multi-site sponsors, it is a real pain in the *ss when it comes to grabbing banners, galleries or content.

              I'm not against NATS sponsors in principle, but unless they have something special to offer or I only need plain links, I often skip over them.

              Comment

              • x3guide
                Confirmed User
                • Dec 2001
                • 735

                #8
                I avoid them.

                Haven't had the time or patience to look into how it works. The ones I looked at didn't allow linking together which means many small checks. And that's no good.
                Shomer fuckin shabbas

                Comment

                • MrPornCash
                  Confirmed User
                  • Jul 2005
                  • 139

                  #9
                  I only had bad experience with programs using nats. Dont ask me why, but there are so many reasons for this.. But the main one is they never seem to help me make any $$

                  For most of the programs using mpa3 I can only say the oposite.

                  I guess ccbill is ok as well.. but to many crappy programs using them and I have found their processor to be unstable from time to time.

                  CURRENTLY IN PRE-LAUNCH

                  Comment

                  • RRRED
                    Confirmed User
                    • Jan 2001
                    • 6754

                    #10
                    We do NOT use nats. I find that some people insist on Nats and others are greatly against it.

                    Comment

                    • NemesiS876
                      Confirmed User
                      • May 2006
                      • 7436

                      #11
                      not meny of them

                      Comment

                      • BlingDaddy
                        Confirmed User
                        • Apr 2004
                        • 6343

                        #12
                        Originally posted by Nasty
                        With the exception of reality cash, I have not had any luck with programs using nats, I have had several programs go from ccbill to nats and have watched my conversions go from 1/500-600 to 1/5000-6000. I had one of them go from 1/500 to 1/8000, I had so many free sites for that particular program that I just switched back to ccbill code and its now averaging around 1/1000.

                        I dont push a program based on what software they use but I no longer push many nats sponsors. if a program switches to nats and leaves the ccbill links active, I just continue promoting via ccbill, if a program switches to nats and asks me to swtich my links, I just delete their free sites and galleries and move on.
                        Quite interesting indeed. I've seen this as well.
                        Every Day... Bling Daddy's Masturbation Station!
                        Bling Daddy's Masturbation Station!

                        The Daily Bag of Douche - Humor at it's FINEST.

                        Comment

                        • Big Red Machine
                          Confirmed User
                          • Jan 2005
                          • 9586

                          #13
                          So what are your main complaints about it?
                          I see most want it too be simplified for ease of use

                          ICQ:475437214

                          Comment

                          • xclusive
                            Too lazy to set a custom title
                            • Apr 2004
                            • 35218

                            #14
                            I personally love nats programs makes things a lot easier.

                            I support MediumPimpin.com / Shemp's Outlawtgp.com /


                            Comment

                            • x3guide
                              Confirmed User
                              • Dec 2001
                              • 735

                              #15
                              Not many. But a single human being has yet to explain how it works. Actually making sense seems overrated.

                              Why can't they be linked? Because it's just a front to payment systems like ccbill? Or can they be linked? Tell us. I'll gladly use it if it makes sense.
                              Shomer fuckin shabbas

                              Comment

                              • x3guide
                                Confirmed User
                                • Dec 2001
                                • 735

                                #16
                                By "linked" I mean hook a new site as a subaccount onto an existing one. Got a ccbill account with around 70 sites on it. Promoting single sites doesn't work when you're a review sites with 1800 sites reviewed. Few clicks here, few clicks there.
                                Shomer fuckin shabbas

                                Comment

                                • Major (Tom)
                                  So Fucking Banned
                                  • Nov 2003
                                  • 32492

                                  #17
                                  Originally posted by Johny Traffic
                                  I dont, but will use MPA3 at a push, still prefere ccbill handeling my cheques, especially from smaller programs.

                                  Id LOVE to hear your reasons for this

                                  duke

                                  Comment

                                  • Wiggles
                                    Too lazy to set a custom title
                                    • May 2004
                                    • 14423

                                    #18
                                    i prefer nats, much easier to keep track of my stats.
                                    no sig

                                    Comment

                                    • Shap
                                      Confirmed User
                                      • May 2001
                                      • 8313

                                      #19
                                      Originally posted by bigdog
                                      How many webmasters acutally won't use a program because they use nats?
                                      From a personal standpoint as of right now whenever i see a sponsor I like using nats i cringe. I've promoted pretty much all types of programs. Only Nats sites have not been able to move into my top 10 earners.

                                      HOWEVER I have 3 new nats programs i turned up the heat on this month. In the next 30 days we'll see if these programs (one of which has always been in my top 10) will work their way up.

                                      Comment

                                      • Shap
                                        Confirmed User
                                        • May 2001
                                        • 8313

                                        #20
                                        btw the one thing that really seems to prevent my nats stats from going up is low rebills. All other programs show good rebills and to date i haven't been happy with the rebills with nats programs.

                                        Comment

                                        • J.R.
                                          WantBoobs.com
                                          • Feb 2002
                                          • 3479

                                          #21
                                          We prefer using the 'processors' themselves.

                                          Epoch or CCBill.

                                          No matter what 3rd party software you pick, they have
                                          flaws and loss of sales will result for anyone using them.
                                          That is a proven fact.

                                          Since we stopped using 3rd party software, our webmasters
                                          are making more $$ and no late checks due to problems with
                                          stats importing.

                                          Comment

                                          • DWB
                                            Registered User
                                            • Jul 2003
                                            • 31779

                                            #22
                                            Not sure how using NATS would change your sign ups to go down. If anything it should go UP if say ccbill declines the surfer and NATS bumps them to say PAYCOM. But to lose sales over it... I dont understand why.

                                            Comment

                                            • ThumbLord

                                              #23
                                              just read what Shap writes and try to understand it.

                                              Comment

                                              • BlingDaddy
                                                Confirmed User
                                                • Apr 2004
                                                • 6343

                                                #24
                                                Originally posted by J.R.
                                                We prefer using the 'processors' themselves.

                                                Epoch or CCBill.

                                                No matter what 3rd party software you pick, they have
                                                flaws and loss of sales will result for anyone using them.
                                                That is a proven fact.

                                                Since we stopped using 3rd party software, our webmasters
                                                are making more $$ and no late checks due to problems with
                                                stats importing.
                                                Yep.....
                                                Every Day... Bling Daddy's Masturbation Station!
                                                Bling Daddy's Masturbation Station!

                                                The Daily Bag of Douche - Humor at it's FINEST.

                                                Comment

                                                • bigdog
                                                  Confirmed User
                                                  • Jul 2001
                                                  • 6964

                                                  #25
                                                  Seems if you only have a ccbill program and swtich to nats, your dammned if you do and dammned if you don't

                                                  Comment

                                                  • SomeCreep
                                                    :glugglug
                                                    • Mar 2003
                                                    • 26118

                                                    #26
                                                    Originally posted by shap
                                                    (one of which has always been in my top 10) will work their way up.
                                                    Yeah, I'm keeping my eye on score-cash too. Let us know your results. I know you have a lot of experience with them, so you'll easily be able to tell how conversions/rebills differ now that they're with NATS.

                                                    Webair Hosting

                                                    I use and recommend Webair for hosting.

                                                    Comment

                                                    • The Ghost
                                                      IslandDollars.com
                                                      • Oct 2004
                                                      • 12188

                                                      #27
                                                      ***Bump for more input.
                                                      ISLAND DOLLARS
                                                      1000's of Exclusive TS scenes / Constant Updates
                                                      Best TS Network your surfers will ever join

                                                      Comment

                                                      • circlekhabib
                                                        Confirmed User
                                                        • Feb 2005
                                                        • 490

                                                        #28
                                                        I won't use a program with nats or mpa
                                                        or epoch for that matter.
                                                        don't trust a damn one of them.
                                                        plus it has never been proven (by an affiliate webmaster)
                                                        that cascading makes more money.

                                                        give me ccbill payouts and recurring.
                                                        transexual sponsors

                                                        Comment

                                                        • studiocritic
                                                          Confirmed User
                                                          • Jun 2005
                                                          • 2442

                                                          #29
                                                          Originally posted by circlekhabib
                                                          plus it has never been proven (by an affiliate webmaster)
                                                          that cascading makes more money.
                                                          what is the logic behind this?

                                                          i'm not a fan of any of the solutions that are out there.. but how can cascading NOT make more?

                                                          if they decline at processor A, and there's no cascading, it's a lost sale.

                                                          if they decline at processor A, and there's cascading, it attempts processor B, C, and so on.. if even 10% of the time one of the latter processors catches it, isn't it worth it?

                                                          what i'd like to hear a program owner put in their 2 cents on, is the effects of the decline-fees on from the different processors on cascading billing.

                                                          processors typically charge a ~$0.50 fee when you send a decline to them.
                                                          254342256

                                                          Comment

                                                          • djroof
                                                            JuicyDevils.gr Owner
                                                            • Jan 2004
                                                            • 25504

                                                            #30
                                                            I love NATS programs ;)

                                                            Comment

                                                            • Shap
                                                              Confirmed User
                                                              • May 2001
                                                              • 8313

                                                              #31
                                                              Originally posted by circlekhabib
                                                              I won't use a program with nats or mpa
                                                              or epoch for that matter.
                                                              don't trust a damn one of them.
                                                              plus it has never been proven (by an affiliate webmaster)
                                                              that cascading makes more money.

                                                              give me ccbill payouts and recurring.
                                                              I'm not being a dick or anything but you are completely clueless. I'm hoping you are a newb or you've been wasting your time. Start up a paysite, study the numbers and you'll look back on your post and think "GOD DAMN that was stupid!"

                                                              We've all been in your shoes, don't take it personal.

                                                              Comment

                                                              • webgurl
                                                                Confirmed User
                                                                • Aug 2002
                                                                • 7954

                                                                #32
                                                                Originally posted by shap
                                                                I'm not being a dick or anything but you are completely clueless. I'm hoping you are a newb or you've been wasting your time. Start up a paysite, study the numbers and you'll look back on your post and think "GOD DAMN that was stupid!"

                                                                We've all been in your shoes, don't take it personal.
                                                                OWNED by shap no you're not being a dick.
                                                                While i was reading that dude's post I was actually
                                                                thinking about the clueless part as well ...

                                                                Comment

                                                                • NTSS
                                                                  Confirmed User
                                                                  • Mar 2005
                                                                  • 5688

                                                                  #33
                                                                  NATS has a built-in shave feature doesn't it?
                                                                  ICQ: 150-803-430
                                                                  Email: marketing7(at)cox(dot)net

                                                                  Comment

                                                                  • BV
                                                                    wtf
                                                                    • Sep 2001
                                                                    • 10914

                                                                    #34
                                                                    I'm sure that the NATS guys could make their script work with merging CCBill accounts and keeping 3rd party payouts. (for revshare)

                                                                    We did with our custom script.

                                                                    When an affiliate signs up with us he can either merge or create a new CCBill acct. At the same time we generate him a Paycom account.

                                                                    The affiliate then has the option to choose whichever one he wants as primary/ secondary biller inside his admin at BVCash.

                                                                    If he feels CCBill is slacking he can switch it to Paycom or visa versa instantly any time he wants.

                                                                    3rd party payouts and all the bells and whistles that allow you to do things that CCBills affiliate software won't let you. ie: cascade billing, campaign tracking, gallery stats, etc etc..

                                                                    Comment

                                                                    Working...