After Shock Media |
05-22-2006 11:58 AM |
Good grief some people hop to conclusions pretty damn fast despite having hardly any relation what so ever.
We find a species previously thought extinct and wham it must mean that the earth is not as old as what scientists believe.
Lets jump back to what is known as reality for a moment. We know very little about our own oceans. Almost all of it is still very unexplored and the vast majority of it any at depth is still highly unknown to science. That combined with the fact that the oceans take up the majority of the earths surface space. We actually know more about the moon than we do our own oceans or even what lies beneath the earths dirt of about anything more than a mile down or so aside from a few core samples drilled.
Now understanding that small tidbit and that we do know more about say for instance the moon. We do know that the moon was formed during a planetary collision between the earth and another planet. (see the moon rock studies and so forth) This collision liquefied earth and the shattered remains and dust that remained in space yet in earths orbit eventually formed the moon. This is also what put earth on its tilted axis. Now we know it takes a lot longer than 6000 years let alone a few hundred thousand years for the moon to take shape and cool off to a solid rock formation. Then even when it did cool off the moon was a lot closer to earth than it is now. (you think we have big waves and tides now). At this time the earth was spinning a great deal faster than it currently is (again due to collision). The gravitational pull of the moon and the friction of the oceans crossing land eventually slowed the earths spin down to the one rotation every twenty four hours that it is currently at. Because of the spinning effect the moon naturally was slowly being flung further into space (centrifugal force and all). We also know that the moon travel about a half an inch away from the earth per year (check NASA for details). For the moon to have reached its current location that it is at (still moving away) it would again take additional tens if not hundred of thousands of years. That little part puts the 6000 year idea out the window.
Using that alone we have gone way past 6000 years and well the earth still would not be that habitable for anything more than microscopic life at best due to its climate. We still have to wait for more developed life to appear, then for life to leave the oceans, then everything else leading up to the impact near what is known as Mexico that wiped out the dinosaurs (look up shocked quartz). We still have a great deal more time to wait for the earliest ancestors of man to start roaming about and an ice age or two. Fast forward many tens of thousands of years and walla some of our ancient ancestors of yet still a different species of man started uses rudimentary tools and fire. Eventually they will have died off or we done killed them all when our species took over yet the ruled the roost for a great deal of time, longer than our species alone has walked this planet including up to today. That 6000 years was just a blink of an eye compared to what has transpired so far.
Don't trust carbon dating, then just look into arctic ice core samples, they also give a very long history of the earth, season by season, year by year.
|