GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Hollywood did a great work with the pentagon video... (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=610606)

GoodGuy 05-16-2006 08:14 PM

Hollywood did a great work with the pentagon video...
 
They did a very good work, it almost look real :1orglaugh

However Bush gov continues with their cheap strategy to wash brains and make people think what happened, by creating videos to make people believe that plane crash really existed. :1orglaugh

Translation 05-16-2006 08:26 PM

dumbass.

baddog 05-16-2006 08:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Translation
dumbass.

correct.

d00t 05-16-2006 08:52 PM

you know what...look at those 2 vids they kept showing...
in the one where it shows the pentagon burning (not the carpark/security gates one) it has a number of light poles in the carpark.

Then look at the carpark security cam and look at the angel it appears come in on.............. ODD

SilentKnight 05-16-2006 09:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by d00t
you know what...look at those 2 vids they kept showing...
in the one where it shows the pentagon burning (not the carpark/security gates one) it has a number of light poles in the carpark.

Then look at the carpark security cam and look at the angel it appears come in on.............. ODD

Did the angel look like this?


http://www.artlex.com/ArtLex/a/image..._thayer.lg.jpg

sltr 05-16-2006 09:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoodGuy
They did a very good work, it almost look real :1orglaugh

However Bush gov continues with their cheap strategy to wash brains and make people think what happened, by creating videos to make people believe that plane crash really existed. :1orglaugh

hollywood is in on the conspiracy too! i thinki am the only one not involved in teh coverups:mad: :Oh crap

SmokeyTheBear 05-16-2006 09:33 PM

lol hollywood could have done much better , that suprises me too...

On one hand every 7-11 in the country has better surveliance camera's ,, that seems ODD

on the other hand if they are going to fake it they could have done a better job..

DaddyHalbucks 05-16-2006 09:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoodGuy
They did a very good work, it almost look real :1orglaugh

However Bush gov continues with their cheap strategy to wash brains and make people think what happened, by creating videos to make people believe that plane crash really existed. :1orglaugh


Yipes. A nutcase in our midst.

madawgz 05-16-2006 09:35 PM

i think it was seriously edited...

ANAL PASTE 05-16-2006 09:36 PM

did anyine see any difference? I couldn't tell shit on either video...

reynold 05-16-2006 10:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by madawgz
i think it was seriously edited...

my thoughts exactly! they have the power to alter anything about that incident in the vid.

marketsmart 05-16-2006 11:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SmokeyTheBear
lol hollywood could have done much better , that suprises me too...

On one hand every 7-11 in the country has better surveliance camera's ,, that seems ODD

on the other hand if they are going to fake it they could have done a better job..


thats what i keep thinking. the pentegon doesnt have real time sec cams. only every few sec stills? doesnt sound likely to me... :2 cents:

DaddyHalbucks 05-17-2006 09:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by madawgz
i think it was seriously edited...

On what basis do you make such a claim?

The video was from a security cam, not from a high speed camera at MIT's lab.

The plane flew into the building at an incoming speed of roughly 500 MPH.

In the small field of view, at at that speed, what would you expect to see?

Yngwie 05-17-2006 09:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaddyHalbucks
On what basis do you make such a claim?

The video was from a security cam, not from a high speed camera at MIT's lab.

The plane flew into the building at an incoming speed of roughly 500 MPH.

In the small field of view, at at that speed, what would you expect to see?

ya, all this talk about a crappy pilot doing some road runner move at 500mph perfectly, extremely low to the ground and there's not skid marks on the grass from where the jet supposedly travelled. Then the hole it made, leaving a sign totally intact right next to the hole.. Ya, it was a jet alright.. Maybe a toy jet. Call me a conspiracy theorist all you want, but I'm no idiot. There was no fucking 757 there. At 500mph there would be shit all over the place from the jet. Oh, it all disintegrated due to the heat, right? Sure and they were able to count the dead bodies.. so this so called extreme heat was hot enough to make and entire 757 vanish, but it could not make the bodies do the same..

I'm so sure that the wings of the jet folded in and once tyhe WHOLE jet was in there the fire/heat made it vanish. Why the fuck are people so fucking easily suckered? I don't give a fuck who it was that did this, the gov, bin laden, the pope, santa.. There was no fucking 757 jet there. Where are the passengers of that flight than? your guess is as good as mine.. Probably dead, but not due to being in the jet when it "crashed"

Show me ONE plane/jet that crashed and there was no debris anywhere. I don't care if it was going 500mph. All that means is that there would be much more force on impact to project parts of the jet all over the fucking place.

Now, as for the shitty video footage available. Why is it that the pentagon of all place only had 2 of it's MANY camera filming on that day? Don't come and tell me that there is only 2 cams surveilling the whole place. There are MANY more, but what do we get to see? Extremely low frame rate video at very far distance so it makes it hard for anyone to see anything clearly. Out of all places you would think that the pentagon would have hi-end video cameras. Of course, I'm sure that the do excpet forthe 2 that were shown. All the others that were not and will never be shown are much better video cameras that caught everything in real time at a high frame rate. If they don't have any other cameras than those 2 than I'm sorry to say but that makes them a laughing stock. Convinience stores have better equipment for fuck sakes oh, but the US gov onle has 2 cheap cameras that catch shit at like 1 frame per second to watch out. ya, tell me another one.

Dollarmansteve 05-17-2006 09:54 AM

I guess every single one of the witnesses who saw a plane were part of the conspiracy too?

here's a page of over 100 eyewitness accounts - all co-conspirators obviously http://eric.bart.free.fr/iwpb/witness.html

Yngwie 05-17-2006 09:59 AM

and where is the proof that these so called 100 eye witnesses actually said this or even exist? I could make a page like that to. Just make up names as I go and write "what they told me".

Yngwie 05-17-2006 10:00 AM

I'm not pointing fingers at anyone. Simply saying that there was no 757 there.

Yngwie 05-17-2006 10:01 AM

as I said, I don't care who did it. That's not the issue here. I jsut know that the citizens of the US are being lied to.

Manowar 05-17-2006 10:06 AM

tinfoil hat time

Yngwie 05-17-2006 10:09 AM

I'd rather be a tinfoil hat wearing nut than an idiot that believes everything the gov. tells you. If it doesn't add up, I question it. Plain and simple.

Kevsh 05-17-2006 10:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoodGuy
They did a very good work, it almost look real :1orglaugh

However Bush gov continues with their cheap strategy to wash brains and make people think what happened, by creating videos to make people believe that plane crash really existed. :1orglaugh

Yep, and the Loose Change video is really credible too, huh?
Did you happen to see on CNN where the reporter from the crash site at the Pentagon said his clip was taken out of context? When he said there was no sign of a crash *near* the Pentagon, he was referring to a witness who claimed a plane crashed outside the building.

Of course, your brainwashed minds (courtesy of Loose Change) did not do your homework and you choose to believe whatever someone tells you. I said way back when this video was first published that it was a joke - it only shows what the producers want you to see.

And the gullible masses assume everything in Loose Change is credible. The joke's on you.... they made ignorant fools believe the plane crash didn't exist. And now that the video's been released, typically, you claim it was doctored, etc.

By chance do you know *why* the video wasn't released until now?
(And no, it wasn't so Hollywood directors could manipulate it - that would have taken about 2 days...)

Tom_PM 05-17-2006 10:18 AM

Well, all flight 93 left was a smoking hole in the ground in Pennsylvania. I didnt see wings, or engines, or luggage or nothin'. I dont understand it, but it is weird. I figured such a large object would leave something behind. Learn something new everyday I guess.

Webby 05-17-2006 10:33 AM

Enough of this crap and back to work! :winkwink:

The war in Iraq is sailing smoothly - all WMD's are now secured - bin Laden is on the run and cornered and the US administration is totally credible, honest and righteous - therefore everything they say is true.


Seriously... don't give a shit what the US admin release or say. They are the most incompetent govt in the western world with no credibility and utter liars at all levels. Any crap over 9/11, or anything else they care to release is totally irrelevant.

StuartD 05-17-2006 10:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SmokeyTheBear
lol hollywood could have done much better , that suprises me too...

On one hand every 7-11 in the country has better surveliance camera's ,, that seems ODD

on the other hand if they are going to fake it they could have done a better job..


After seeing the vid, I really wanted to go to the store and buy them a $50 logitech webcam cause it would be WAY better than what they are currently using.

StuartD 05-17-2006 10:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PR_Tom
Well, all flight 93 left was a smoking hole in the ground in Pennsylvania. I didnt see wings, or engines, or luggage or nothin'. I dont understand it, but it is weird. I figured such a large object would leave something behind. Learn something new everyday I guess.

Especially since it's only the 2nd plane in history to disappear completely on impact.

The Pentagon plane being the first to do it... that very same day.

The Ghost 05-17-2006 10:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SmokeyTheBear
lol hollywood could have done much better , that suprises me too...

On one hand every 7-11 in the country has better surveliance camera's ,, that seems ODD

on the other hand if they are going to fake it they could have done a better job..

Hell, I still don't know if the moonlanding video real. I'm not gonna to move onto this subject until that one's figured out once and for all.

germ 05-17-2006 11:48 AM

i like what the guy on bill mahre said the other day.

"all conspiracy theories have 2 main flaws.
1) they believe the government is competant.
and 2) they believe that the government can keep a secret"

MrJackMeHoff 05-17-2006 11:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dollarmansteve
I guess every single one of the witnesses who saw a plane were part of the conspiracy too?

here's a page of over 100 eyewitness accounts - all co-conspirators obviously http://eric.bart.free.fr/iwpb/witness.html


hmm thats funny because when it happend the eyewitness video accounts were all that it was a missile. Now all the sudden..

DaddyHalbucks 05-17-2006 01:07 PM

According to hundreds of witnesses, the plane hit the lawn then crashed into the building.

Why is that so hard to believe?


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:37 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123