GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Now that .xxx is pretty much over... (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=608640)

xxxjay 05-11-2006 02:09 PM

Now that .xxx is pretty much over...
 
What do you think they will scare us with next...

SolidScripting 05-11-2006 02:12 PM

Aren't they rewriting 2257 to push through again?

xxxjay 05-11-2006 02:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SolidScripting
Aren't they rewriting 2257 to push through again?

yes....:Oh crap

FetishWeb 05-11-2006 02:26 PM

I think we are overdue for another round of issues with VISA.

madawgz 05-11-2006 02:27 PM

bush is a huge threat to everyone!

munki 05-11-2006 02:29 PM

Next up... Pornnaught....

tony286 05-11-2006 02:44 PM

2257 could be a ballbuster

AlienQ - BANNED FOR LIFE 05-11-2006 02:45 PM

Who cares.

The only time when people will stop fucking is when mankind dies off the planet. Till then it will always make money.

Big Red Machine 05-11-2006 02:46 PM

Did anyone see the Robot Chicken episode with the Bush Daughters ...lol

xclusive 05-11-2006 03:30 PM

2257 antics

webgurl 05-11-2006 03:36 PM

With that poll i think there is 3 of them up to bat next .
Visa shuts us down <------ oh boy i didn't vote for this one

bdld 05-11-2006 03:53 PM

hopefully something that will thin the herd

wargames 05-11-2006 03:58 PM

Jay ill take 2257 for 300 :thumbsup

But seriously it is starting to really drive me crazy that every 3 months we get attacked by something else :(

thricer 05-11-2006 04:01 PM

The bush twins starting their own affiliate program

american pervert 05-11-2006 04:08 PM

visa.. that would be the worst of all

minusonebit 05-11-2006 04:34 PM

Little bit of makeup, we could turn them out into a KILLER lesbo shoot.

BobG 05-11-2006 04:40 PM

Jeb Bush in 2008! :Oh crap

shermo 05-11-2006 06:01 PM

Definitly 2257.... The restructuring is in place already, correct?

xxxjay 05-11-2006 07:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by shermsshack
Definitly 2257.... The restructuring is in place already, correct?

From what I understand, you are correct sir.

Spunky 05-11-2006 07:36 PM

Whatever happened with Acacia?

Degenerate 05-11-2006 07:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SolidScripting
Aren't they rewriting 2257 to push through again?

Yup, scary there too.

QualityMpegs 05-11-2006 07:40 PM

Noone thinks Voluntary Labeling?

reynold 05-12-2006 12:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BobG
Jeb Bush in 2008! :Oh crap

not another Bush in the White House. :mad:

xxxjay 05-12-2006 01:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by QualityMpegs
Noone thinks Voluntary Labeling?

That's my pick, becasue that approach is almost reasonable....I'm not sure about 5 years in the clink, but it would seem like it would actually protect kids.

xxxjay 05-12-2006 02:38 AM

Bump..................

xxxjay 05-12-2006 04:56 AM

........................

xxxjay 05-12-2006 01:09 PM

friday........

Drake 05-12-2006 01:10 PM

If it's not one thing it's another. You're right in predicting there will another industry wide scare in the near future. :(

seeric 05-12-2006 01:11 PM

ROFL


The Bush twins starting their own affiliate program

xxxjay 05-12-2006 06:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by A1R3K
ROFL


The Bush twins starting their own affiliate program

Don't laugh...it could be the downfall of all of us.

SolidScripting 05-12-2006 06:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xxxjay
yes....:Oh crap

They can write and re-write all they want.

They can't get rid of the phrase 'overly restrictive and burdensome'

...the current congressional conservatives intent is to be OVERLY restrictive and burdensome.

I think any 2257 issues will be ultimately blocked by the courts as long as those last 2 conservatives don't go too blindly Jebus on us.

That is really my only concern.

If we knew for a fact that the current supremes were solidly judicial and didn't have any thread of talibanism running through there veins I would not sweat it at all.

xxxjay 05-13-2006 06:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SolidScripting
They can write and re-write all they want.

They can't get rid of the phrase 'overly restrictive and burdensome'

...the current congressional conservatives intent is to be OVERLY restrictive and burdensome.

I think any 2257 issues will be ultimately blocked by the courts as long as those last 2 conservatives don't go too blindly Jebus on us.

That is really my only concern.

If we knew for a fact that the current supremes were solidly judicial and didn't have any thread of talibanism running through there veins I would not sweat it at all.

I don't know about that,

czarina 05-13-2006 06:47 PM

First they will hit us with a new 2257, and on the same bill push throught the 25% tax.

Right after that the .xxx will be started up again. and if all of that is not enough, Hillary will win the next election, providing someone finds a way to removie king bush from power.

L-Pink 05-13-2006 07:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by czarina
Right after that the .xxx will be started up again. and if all of that is not enough, Hillary will win the next election, providing someone finds a way to removie king bush from power.


She will outlaw all adult except lesbian :1orglaugh


.

fusionx 05-13-2006 07:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by shermsshack
Definitly 2257.... The restructuring is in place already, correct?

It's going to the Senate - already passed the house.

http://www.fight2257.com/fight-2257/...dult-porn-avn/

Great article by Mark Kernes of AVN.

geedub 05-13-2006 07:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BobG
Jeb Bush in 2008! :Oh crap

Thats what scares me most. Wonder who he'd pick for VP??

L-Pink 05-13-2006 08:07 PM

As a photographer this bothers me, alot.

Sec. 606, ?PROHIBITING THE PRODUCTION OF OBSCENITY AS WELL AS TRANSPORTATION, DISTRIBUTION, AND SALE.?

Over the course of a shoot, (stills or video), sometimes only a fraction of images captured are used. Something "obscene" may be captured, edited out for finished product, never seen by the public .... but you did "produce" it, "transported" it from location to offices for editing.

Now you are guilty, two counts for something the public never sees.

.

davecummings 05-14-2006 08:51 AM

Worrisome---Net Neutrality (where Congress passes that bill to let cable/phone companies charge for access to certain places, like porn sites??????).


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:08 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123