Who are the top 10 companies with 1-2 sites?
 

Too explain. What are the top 10 companies with 1 or 2 sites?

Like www.sapphicerotica.com, www.teendreams.com, www.alssacan.com, www.karups.com. So give me your opinions

Does anyone here know?

DukeDollars with facialabuse :)

That's part of a program and I doubt if it make sthe money to get it up to the ones I mentioned.

Why, because it's not glamour?

News Flash... there are HUGE sites outside of the glamour scene. I can't rub one off to any of the sites in your list. Quality photos for sure, but totally un-wankable for me. Met-Art is the only site of any quality that I find hot. Met-Art kicks total ass.

Many of you photographers are too one track minded. I read on some photo boards when you guys get into little piffs over one guys lighting or other petty shit as if the majority of surfers even notice if a pic is white balanced or not. A guy with a hard cock in his hand does not care. Voyer Web is a prime example of this.

Anyway, I'm getting off track. Happy hunting.

don't forget atk

well said, thanks!

Good point. I think Dean's work for twistys is great, but i can't spank my monkey to any of that glamour stuff. Everyone likes something different. I need bad lighting and a curvy girl without tons of makeup on.

dieselcash with youngporn.net :)

How do you define top ten. Amount of members, amount of traffic etc??. We have only one site in our program, and I would guess it's one of the bigger ones regarding traffic, daily sales, and total amount of members. But it's obviously a big guess as to whether it's top ten material (doubt it...:( )

I also think Duke Dollars facial abuse is the type of site that would have a tonne of members etc, but there is no way of really knowing.

CashTitans with http://www.cumonherface.com

Sapphic, karups, various dating sites obviously, met-art, blacksonblondes, twistys, ten.com, i dont know, obvious ones like penthouse, playboy, ddgirls, suze, danni, atk (although, several sites here i must say, but maybe of similar theme)...
Alsscan and teendreams aren't as big as you think they are. At least not compared to those above.

Very good points. However completely wrong.

If porn had anything to do with lighting and focusing then getting it right would be so simple 10s of 1,000s could do it. Thankfully it's not about photography.

Porn is about stimulating a fantasy in the viewers brain, and nothing about photography. The fantasy can be different for so many people and needs a different approach to get right.

On a personal level I have always loved Buttman, Ben Dover and early Ed Powers. Yes I also like Suze Randall and Earl Miller but more for the photography than pornography.

And lastly if I had to rely on my photography skills to earn a living I would be broke.

:)

Duke

perfectgonzo comes to mind

Hiya Paul :)

Duke

what about videosz?

so wrong on the duke thing


facial abuse is huge

seek and ye shall find!

thx bro
duke

Indeed it is, one of my friends was telling me about a trailer he saw on Facial Abuse a few days ago on the golf course. :2 cents:

OK sorry on that one.

:glugglug

true. but some of you serious photo cats get way to caught up in it. sounds like you may not be one of them. good for you.

I'd say Nubiles would have to be up there. They always do great for me.