is this little boy over 18? Does he have to be?
 

is this little boy over 18? Does he have to be since he is just a bystander in the background of a shoot?

http://gallery.bikini-dare.com/calpe/052/fbtgp.html
http://gallery.bikini-dare.com/calpe/052/preview02.jpg
http://gallery.bikini-dare.com/calpe/052/preview02.jpg

I think it's alright if he is there

"Watch and learn, my son."

I think thats pushing the limits...

That is child endangerment I think....

Why play games and take a chance?

I'd remove the images with him in the background. Better to err on the side of caution.

i dont see no steeking boy!

looks like the owner took the pics down

still up here.

I couldn't see the boy, but if there is a kid, you don't need 2257, since he is not performing. But to cover their asses, they should photochop him. Just in case...

Let's forget the legal question for a minute here: That gallery is not at ALL appropriate, PERIOD.

Would you want YOUR son appearing in a gallery like that? I think not.

Who's the fucking asshole responsible for that shit anyway?

Visit a european beach...

:ugone2far

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh

Where is the kids parents?

jamaica:upsidedow

that is mom explaining the birds and the bees

I wouldn't mind if my mom did that but the kid looks 10 at the most

:1orglaugh :winkwink: i agree the only way it could be worse is if the hat the kid is sucking on was a bong.....or worse:helpme

and before i forget....i find it ironic that shortly after sexeducation shows with a fake nick fringe child porn pops up....i would like to be the one who starts this conspiracy theory:thumbsup

Now thats a good parent huh
that is fucked up:disgust

Hope Thats Not His Mom

Hey it might be his sister.

looks like an old folks convention in the background

or a wall..

yah.. that is fucking disgusting.. she is the reason why we have CPS

I see no kid in any backround.

the jpg links are no longer working

It is legal for him to be on a nude beach in most states with his parents, but with all the other issues around anything to do with porn, I would chop him out, or not use the imagess.

is that a dildo in that kid's mouth?

He's gotta be at least 18.. according to their 2257 records that is

:Oh crap

look closer... second pic from the top
http://gallery.bikini-dare.com/calpe/052/fbtgp.html

Those two links aint working here..

He wouldn't even understand boobies then.

Sorry, I can't see any kids there.

i couldnt see him but if he is there like yous say chop him

:Oh crap :Oh crap Damn..

Walk on any european beach and you see titties everywhere....

okay they shouldn't have used that pic imho... gotta agree on that one but it isn't illegal

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh holy shit!

I fail to see how these photos are even sexually explicit to begin with. So there should be no fuss over this particular location in general.

As for the kid being exposed to some skin, remember that they were not shot in the US. In our corner of the world this sort of thing is deemed harmful (and would surely scar an American boy for life), but not that big of a deal elsewhere. Kids are commonly seen on topless and nude beaches outside of the US.

HOWEVER..... The owners of this site should have realized that the average American would be offended by this, and not posted the photos at all.

My mother used to take me to nude beaches and saunas all the time. Pretty normal in Holland. Not sure how and in what way that would 'scar' anyone. They are not fucking or anything.