![]() |
Is this site legal
http://www.darksideplus.com/previews01.php
http://www.darksideplus.com/nnh/gall...2005_12_16.htm wtf, some of those pics on there of gilrs look like they are under 18, something is not right with this site, it should be reported. It says that they are a non nude site, but there is nude girls on there. |
Who's going first?
|
it also has guba links all over it.
|
just looks like its amateur/candid photos from around the web, you cant really tell if they are legal or not.
|
I thought anything goes on the internet, I was a horse fucking a woman once....
|
look up his whois email adress - nice one ;-)
|
Quote:
|
My connection is slow right now and it took forever to load. Did notice they were pushing NastyDollars and Guba.
|
|
only for some countries
|
Hmm. Not gonna click that.
|
Quote:
|
they should be closed down, and wtf is guba doing.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Fris,
was joan able to do anything about this disgrace of a site that guba has. |
Quote:
I just see 1 link on each page.... |
Quote:
|
How can ccbill process for that? Obviously he has nothing even close to 2257. Its just collected content.
|
Quote:
|
Man, ccbill rejects your paysite if your 25 year old model has pigtails or a teddybear but they accept sites with unknown teen girls with no 2257 spreading their legs.
|
Quote:
http://img139.imagevenue.com/img.php...nnhotto042.jpg look under 18, ok they are not completley naked, but where do you draw the line, i think it is wrong, its like those fuckheads that start up those non nude sites for kids and put them in sexy bikinis and say yeah but they are not nude, it is still the same twisted, demented fucks getting of on the pictures. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Seriously, are you really this much of an attention whoring douchebag? College and Teens in "Barely Legal" suggestions are probably the 2nd largest niches being promoted today. All this political correctness is just hillarious. :sleep Not that I care. I just personally think Batts as a message board personality is a sig whoring twat. :1orglaugh |
Im on this...im totally investigating this!
I printed out this pic as evidence! http://img320.imageshack.us/img320/8...01988080hw.jpg brb |
Quote:
|
I can't believe that I read this thread.
|
Quote:
|
This thread needs a bump.
|
I dont care about the pics. Im just wondering how ccbill operates.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Anyway, ccbill should care. Once again, they care if theres a teddybear in the pic.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I agree. |
Dunno ... I don't think any of them really looked underage ... I know LOADS of 21 - 24 year old girls who look like that ... LOADS. Fact is, girls can look older or younger and you can't much tell ... meh... if you wanna investigate, you can. All looked ametuer to me.
|
does not look illegal regarding sexually explicite....
....but I doubt the 45.000 pics, hosted on imageshack, are copyrighted as it says :1orglaugh |
dunno how 'illegal" it is age-wise etc.. but I agree with the others, looks more like hes grabbing these pics so probably not his material etc..
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
hey batts i think calvin klien ads are wrong, but so what? |
Quote:
Stolen Heidihoney.com content on here. Where's Silentbucks? http://www.darksideplus.com/nnh/gall...2006_01_21.htm |
| All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:46 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123