GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Do these girls look young to you - or is i just me ? (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=59081)

CRAB 05-02-2002 02:53 PM

Do these girls look young to you - or is i just me ?
 
you think they'r over 18 ? i doubt it

http://www.ohgood.com

Steve 05-02-2002 02:57 PM

I wonder if J4F is happy with this ad campaign?

Cheshire 05-02-2002 03:00 PM

I would be very surprised if the first three girls were of legal age.

Theo 05-02-2002 03:02 PM

me too
no way to be 18+

Loch 05-02-2002 03:03 PM

hell they could be over 21 for all we know, wakeup can do wonders you know :Graucho
strip them of the makeup and they will probably look 30, look at them in the morning and youl RUN LIKE HELL.

Shoot your self in the head when you finaly remember that you bragged all night to your friends about that AMASING brod you just picked up in the disco "nooooo never tryed it" :eek7

MetaformX 05-02-2002 03:04 PM

If that is not CP, I dont know what is

XP 05-02-2002 03:05 PM

They are under 18 for sure.
I saw theese girls pics on some russian cp sites.

vegasdude 05-02-2002 03:06 PM

Quote:

Oh Network, Inc. takes a strong position against child pornography and in no way endorses, approves or encourages it.
looks very young indeed... but I cvant say for sure how old they are!

Milton 05-02-2002 03:07 PM

16 or 17 meybee

Cheshire 05-02-2002 03:08 PM

Not cool:feels-hot , one of those girls looks just like my baby sister(:angel).

Not cool at all.:feels-hot

eroswebmaster 05-02-2002 03:09 PM

all the sponsor has to do is request 2557 info...if the wm licensed those pics (doubt it) then he has no problems.

Beastiepoo 05-02-2002 03:09 PM

Once again I HATE :feels-hot to agree with Meta but I have serious doubts that at least 3 of those girls are 18+. 15, 16, 17 prolly, but not legal. Shame, they look like nice kids and are now warped for life.:(

ronaldo 05-02-2002 03:11 PM

blackcat scans aged 13-17

nocostporn 05-02-2002 03:14 PM

How can somebody say they are 17 but not 18?? LOL..how to you distinguish a year in age? The only questionable chick is the 3rd pic...I'm 19 and I look more like a young girl then they do :thumbsup

ronaldo 05-02-2002 03:22 PM

http://www.blackcat-teens.org/

ldinternet 05-02-2002 03:25 PM

the age that they look and their real age are two different things... however, i'd have to say that they look eighteen plus compared to some of the girls that i go to college with. whether they are or not is another matter. if they are below a legal age, well... exploitation is pretty shitty. :BangBang: :mad: :BangBang: :mad:

posing nude at 16/17 is a sensitive issue. age of consent here is 16, sex is accepted at that age, and people don't even think twice about it. by watching the 'barely legal' video series ("hey... i'm 18 now! lets fuck!") it seems that 18 is the accepted age in the usa. so who is right? and does it matter that someone can't fuck a 16/17 year old in their home country, but if they jump on a plane and fly a few thousand miles to europe, they can fuck their brains out with a 'consenting' 16/17 year old guy/girl? personally i don't see how somebody suddenly becomes consenting the second that they hit 16/18/whatever years old. it can't be unacceptable to fuck an hour before the 17th birthday, but perfectly acceptable to fuck 61 minutes later when someone hits 18. thats just laughable. it should be a matter of maturity, as some people don't mature until they're like 25, i'd have to say that nobody is really right on this issue. however, i wouldn't show a bias either way. now discuss. :Graucho

Shoplifter 05-02-2002 03:27 PM

They are under 18. They are from a russian CP series.

boldy 05-02-2002 03:29 PM

Fucking CP, take this shit offline!
:BangBang:

Beastiepoo 05-02-2002 03:31 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by nocostporn
How can somebody say they are 17 but not 18?? LOL..how to you distinguish a year in age? The only questionable chick is the 3rd pic...I'm 19 and I look more like a young girl then they do :thumbsup
Only by living through the age and being observant. I agree that young adult girls are looking younger and younger these days (I'm only 23) but there is an innocence about a few of THOSE girls that makes me wonder.

BTW, where in MD? I grew up in Annapolis.....

Cheshire 05-02-2002 03:33 PM

The girl used in the 'Lolita Dreams' banner looks NINE.
I'm not even exaggerating.:mad:

Shooter 05-02-2002 03:35 PM

Hmm....looks like there's only two pics at the top now.

Beastiepoo 05-02-2002 03:38 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Shooter
Hmm....looks like there's only two pics at the top now.
Yep, the two oldest looking girls remain. Ever wonder what kind of an impact our virtual rambling actually has on the porn industry? I never would have thought anyone would take any notice of anything I've said.

koon 05-02-2002 03:44 PM

i dont have any ref for those pics ...
to prove they are 18 + or not
cause i got it from my friend

if it is so questionable ...
i will take it off now

ty for point it out CRAB ....
i dont want to be a CP webmaster ...

pipp 05-02-2002 03:52 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by koon
i dont have any ref for those pics ...
to prove they are 18 + or not
cause i got it from my friend

if it is so questionable ...
i will take it off now

ty for point it out CRAB ....
i dont want to be a CP webmaster ...

blah "I got them from a friend" eh ? Pardon me but have you ever heard off lisensing content?

Tipsy 05-02-2002 04:00 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by koon
i dont have any ref for those pics ...
to prove they are 18 + or not
cause i got it from my friend

if it is so questionable ...
i will take it off now

ty for point it out CRAB ....
i dont want to be a CP webmaster ...

I was gonna say much the same as Pipp. Not only were they probably underage (I missed the pics) but they were also unlicensed (I suppose it goes hand in hand with the underage part). Either was if you get fucked by the authorities I doubt anybody would have much sympathy.

Cheshire 05-02-2002 04:00 PM

The style of copy changed completely too.

:thumbsup

ZatCHICKPIXXX 05-02-2002 04:10 PM

hhhhhhmmmmmm
:disgust
they look VERY YOUNG... BUT, who knows?!

doubts of 18....IMO

but i'm 31/f and I still get carded for ciggs,
(have to be 18 for ciggs, in NJ USA):winkwink:

:ak47:

picpile 05-02-2002 04:14 PM

i have seen these pictures for sale at a content site. not sure which ones. and the pictures have been and out of the tgp's for over a year now

DarkJedi 05-02-2002 04:21 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by picpile
i have seen these pictures for sale at a content site. not sure which ones. and the pictures have been and out of the tgp's for over a year now
the pics have already been replaced

Lexxx 05-02-2002 04:22 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by CRAB
you think they'r over 18 ? i doubt it

http://www.ohgood.com

It's just you... they look 25-30... LOL

phogirl69 05-02-2002 04:24 PM

the pics just were replaced.
There were really young looking models on that site just 5 min ago

Shooter 05-02-2002 04:27 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Lexxx


It's just you... they look 25-30... LOL


Lexxx, the pics have been changed since he posted.

Tipsy 05-02-2002 04:30 PM

That's at least 3 people not bothered to read any of the other posts saying the pics had been removed. I wonder how many more there'll be? :)

bdld 05-02-2002 04:38 PM

saw those pics the other day, i was shocked coming from a well known tgp

Mike D 05-02-2002 04:55 PM

So the pics that are up there right now are not the pics you were talking about ????



Mike........

just Mikey 05-02-2002 04:58 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Shoplifter
They are under 18. They are from a russian CP series.
they look 18+ too me and surely not from russian CP sites.. what a bullshit you are writing here... you can find younger looking girls at Web-legal.com ...

we have younger looking girls on our teen paysite (but we also have USC-compliant license)... I will not post URL here because most of you are really crazy about such stuff :321GFY

why russians always made responsible? this content is not russian... this is usual teen content... girls look adult and pretty fuckable

P.S.. maybe im reading too late and pics on site were changed??? :Graucho

phogirl69 05-02-2002 05:01 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by just Mike



P.S.. maybe im reading too late and pics on site were changed??? :Graucho

No fucking shit Sherlock!

DarkJedi 05-02-2002 05:05 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by just Mike


they look 18+ too me and surely not from russian CP sites.. what a bullshit you are writing here... you can find younger looking girls at Web-legal.com ...

we have younger looking girls on our teen paysite (but we also have USC-compliant license)... I will not post URL here because most of you are really crazy about such stuff :321GFY

why russians always made responsible? this content is not russian... this is usual teen content... girls look adult and pretty fuckable

P.S.. maybe im reading too late and pics on site were changed??? :Graucho


ROFL !!! :1orglaugh this is starting to get amusing

UnseenWorld 05-02-2002 05:06 PM

I shoot girls and look at ID all the time, and I can tell you that looking at those girls, they all could be as old as 20. Here is a gal I call Eriko, 20 years old:

http://www.unseenworld.com/Temp/ErikoSample1.jpg

and Julietta, 19 years old:

http://www.unseenworld.com/Temp/JuliettaSample1.jpg

The point being, be VERY careful when speculating about a model's age. You probably are clueless, especially if, unlike people like me, you are not regularly comparing a girl's appearance with ID documentation.

People don't appear a particular age, they appear to be a range of ages ("she could be anywhere from 15-20").

CP is a serious matter, and accusations should not be made in publid without facts in hand.

Loch 05-02-2002 05:09 PM

Is it me or does eriko have to short legs? :winkwink:

Beastiepoo 05-02-2002 05:14 PM

Agreed Unseen, you do have two very young looking, legal age girls there. But if you saw those pics you'd be asking yourself the same questions we all were asking.
With girls aged 15-25, they can all look similar in body/development. The giveaway usually lies in the eyes/facial expression. Girls of age don't tend to look like deer in the headlights the way younger, abused kids do when posing nude. The only possible exceptions would be if you could find actual virgins over 18 willing to pose.(Like that ever happens:thumbsup )

Ted 05-02-2002 05:15 PM

Besides some probable copyright issues that sight looks legal.

Of the girls that definately look underage, they are only head and shoulder shots. definately not morally right, but not illegal

As for the black cat site, none of the billing options work....... wonder why ?

just Mikey 05-02-2002 05:16 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by phogirl69

No fucking shit Sherlock!

IM NOT FUCKING SHERLOCK - YOU ARE...
I'm not browsing other people's sites and posting bullshit about them on public board without a reason... If you wanna be a fucking good citizen write your report to FBI, Interpol and his hosting provider.... but why shout about this here? are we all authorities or something???

2 UnseenWorld :
Great Pics! Probably we will buy from you! And let others talk that this is child porn - who cares ? :1orglaugh


2 ALL :
In some places like Siberia girls may look 17 when they 25 because it's always cold there and they grow slow. I would pay a lot for such content.

DarkJedi 05-02-2002 05:18 PM

Erik0 seems to have quite short legs

smithy 05-02-2002 05:24 PM

yeah......wrong size and age for me :(


---------------------------
www.gatorcash.com

UnseenWorld 05-02-2002 05:25 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by DarkJedi
Erik0 seems to have quite short legs
Part of why she looks young.

wildjohn999 05-02-2002 05:27 PM

I am kind of having the same problem with my TGP. I get some gay galleries submitted from some .ru sites where the guys in the ads look like they should still be in elementary school. What the hell is wrong with europeans? First scat, then this?

UnseenWorld 05-02-2002 05:27 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Beastiepoo
Agreed Unseen, you do have two very young looking, legal age girls there. But if you saw those pics you'd be asking yourself the same questions we all were asking.
With girls aged 15-25, they can all look similar in body/development. The giveaway usually lies in the eyes/facial expression. Girls of age don't tend to look like deer in the headlights the way younger, abused kids do when posing nude. The only possible exceptions would be if you could find actual virgins over 18 willing to pose.(Like that ever happens:thumbsup )

Are you talking about the half-dozen or so pics at the top of the page? All of those girls could be as old as 22 as far as I'm concerned, and I compare faces and bodies with ID all the time.

DarkJedi 05-02-2002 05:28 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by just Mike


2 ALL :
In some places like Siberia girls may look 17 when they 25 because it's always cold there and they grow slow. I would pay a lot for such content.

now that you've mensioned it, i'm positive those girls were from Syberia

















Bhahahahahahahah :1orglaugh

Beastiepoo 05-02-2002 05:31 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by UnseenWorld


Are you talking about the half-dozen or so pics at the top of the page? All of those girls could be as old as 22 as far as I'm concerned, and I compare faces and bodies with ID all the time.

Nope, I'm talking about the pics that were ORIGINALLY put on the top of that page in the place where those pics now sit. This was about an hour or so ago (umm.....7:30pm EST/12:30am GMT) The pics there now look totally legit. I'd doubt any of THOSE girls are under 20!


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:04 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123