Will you teach me better Google seo in exchange for...
 

anchor links , blog plugs and advertising space? the more I learn, the better your links look on my network.

~Ray
icq 94994627

depends on the amount of links, and ad space we're talking about :winkwink:

free seo tip of the day for you ray
you crosslink all your domains
google aint as stupid as yahoo
they know you do :)

why don't you read, test or pay for coaching like everyone else you cheap hahahaha

it is a huge playground. :)

http://www.unscripted.com/
http://www.masterblogs.biz/
http://www.masterblogs.biz/?sites=adult

links = 269,000 blogs with 3 rss feeds per blog , 3 pages per article + archives
adspace - top banner spot accross all blogs on a few niche domains.
anchor - bottom link on all blogs on a niche domain.

You will be teaching my smart friend. I'm too dumb to keep interest in the tech stuff.

~Ray
icq 94994627

the random links at the bottom of my blogs link to other blogs on the same domain.

No blogs on 1 domain link to blogs on another domain.

this is the closest they get http://www.masterblogs.biz

I want to learn

P.S. I crosslinked domains on my celeb se matrix.. this is for my blog network on unscripoted.com - http://www.masterblogs.biz/

I have a celeb se that I studied for years and got 80+ domains high into Yahoo.. but no luck with google.

The size of my playground is worth more than money to a good seo'r , they have money.. they need more playspace.

piggybacking on this tip and giving it some background...

unless you get ___# of hosts, with ____# of authentic looking whois data, on diff NSs, etc etc etc, in different geographical hosting locations, etc...

what Trax said is absolutely true...think of your domains as unique entities if you want them to be seen and treated as such...

that means I'd need 224 hosts. shit. no wonder wired guy and mr pheer are so rich.

no one has hit me up on icq yet.. :)

~Ray
icq 94994627

you don't need 224 hosts, but it's not uncommon for seo guys to use 10 hosts, and dozens of different ips...

should I change the whois info? I have accurate info now, I'd need to lie.

this coming from a guy who was trying to sell a domain with fake PR. i wouldnt do business with a scammer like that.

Or just smarter hosting...

ie, 225 class 'c' ip's on several different name servers.

this coming froma guy whole stole money from pinkworld submitters.

I don't make fake pr... google does. I just link my sites together in anet... on that server.

I doubt anyone wants links from a bad network as it will fuck them in google as well.

won't their tutorials make it a better network for their links to be on?

or am I always wrong?

how many different subnets?

If you're already marked as a bad network it won't help anytime soon. (No idea if you are but with all that dup content I doubt it's good)

Talking out of your ass again?

If that was the case then people would be getting banned left and right. All it would take is to link to anyone from some banned domains.

No, GotWebHost.com can give you up to 50 different Class C's with each having their own nameserver.

On top of that, you get free SEO consultations.

They don't get banned fuckstick. Do your own research, it's pretty widely discussed.

I can appreciate that.. but anyone can pay to be listed in google, I want to do it the hard way.

that's a lot of horsepower

"Don't participate in link schemes designed to increase your site's ranking or PageRank. In particular, avoid links to web spammers or "bad neighborhoods" on the web, as your own ranking may be affected adversely by those links."

FACT

http://www.google.com/webmasters/guidelines.html

Only going to get bigger.

Getting linked from banned sites *will not* 'get you fucked up in google'

Every seo noob knows this, you inbred retard.

best of luck

Having reading comprehension, are we?

you fucking imbecile.

thank you

Aye Homeboy... The best way I can tell you to get listed in google is by trading links... alot of them. The more links you got floating around the internet, the more chances you have with google becuase they do the web crawl shit. The Best way to get links is by asking... i'll trade links with you. But on some real shit, You should go ahead and pay google a few dollars with adwords and hit up a site like www.trafficcircuit.com and spend an extra 60 dollas. Sometimes the hard way aint the smart way. All it takes is a lil money to jump start your shit. I just got my site up and running last week and im doing fairly well, with google bringing 80% of my traffic. the other 20% comes from my text links exchanges. Holla back!

Either way, getting links FROM "bad neighborhoods" doesn't benefit you in any way, and MAY even get your sites penalized. So you end up doing SEO consulting, but you gain nothing out of it...

they would soeing the network, so if the suck, they get penalized. :)

High PR with decent amount of incoming links from sites that arent all interconnected link wise. simple as that.

No.

If it was that way, seo would be a clusterfuck, with competitors fucking each other over just by linking to you.

The worst that could happen to you is that those bad neighbourhood backlinks wouldn't be counted as backlinks.

I'm going to give your sites a free network wide blog plug with text link and all the trimmings.. :)