![]() |
AOL Wins Judgment Against Spammer
Quote:
25,000$ for everyday he sent out spam ? Do you really think he made near to this with his spams? Poor guy, he ruined his life :Oh crap |
pretty harsh
|
that guy is a GFY'r
|
This is terrific. I just wish it didn't take so damn long to get to court with these cases.
I hit delete , keep my mouth shut for the most part, but I shouldn't HAVE to . |
Quote:
btw this was posted already |
Quote:
He got what he deserved, he should have been put in jail for a couple of years aswell. |
psh. chris was doing well over $1mill/month with his pharmacy. a $5-6mill hit is nothing ... a cost of doing biz, if u shall
|
Quote:
it will be interesting to see how much jail time he gets. if he just gets convicted of the basics, i would say he's looking at about 3-5.... the variables in this case are that he pissed the judge off and left the country to avoid prosecution... |
I can't believe idiots who send SPAM to billing@, accounting@, sales@, support@.
You're pissing the wrong people off and eventually, you will pay. It's not a matter of If, it's When. |
The United States Government sends junk mail to my house every day of my life for the past fucking thirty-seven years. At least this spammer wasn't killing trees in the process.
Why is it illegal for someone to send email, yet perfectly legal for the Post Office to make a profit sending out junk mail? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Is that where you got your nic from? |
Yes, how unreasonable of him to send spam, that might actually compete with all the spam sent by AOL to its members.
|
Quote:
The feds don't get a cut of spam revenue, so they have no incentive to keep it legal, especially since the big ISPs are lobbying them for exclusive spamming rights to their own customers. |
lolz... that's the prize for spamming...
|
Quote:
Spam contributes more to the economy than does online adult, and deserves more respect than it gets. |
Depending on what his bank balance is... that could be a pretty harsh judgment.
|
Quote:
This is about the stupidest shit I've read all week. You're nothing more than a piece of shit spammer trying to justify your actions. Spam eats up resources and bandwidth for those of us who actually have legitimate online businesses, and it has cost businesses millions by not being able to send email to their customers because of spam filters. |
Quote:
If you don't think spam has produced more money for businesses than it "costs" businesses ask someone smarter than you and listen to the answer with an open mind. Or come on gfy and cry about the magical disappearing millions. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Yes, there are many frauds and ripoffs perpetuated by spam, but that doesn't mean that it is inherently evil. Spam is a medium, not a product, and I don't see why we should attack it when it connects millions of buyers to sellers. If you're so upset about penis pills, why don't you start off on a rant against all the sponsors who advertise their pill programs on this board? If were going to start marginalizing a viable business, how the fuck can we be upset and not hypocritical when the damn Christian conservatives start marginalizing adult? |
Damn that sucks, they prolly wont see much of that judgement...
|
Quote:
If you have 4-6 hours a week to waste sifting through the spam shit...all I can say to you is get a fucking life. Spammers should be sent to jail for the rest of their lives to be fucked up the arse by the perves. I could throttle spammers. Lyn from Oz |
Quote:
play with fire and your bound to get burned! :2 cents: |
Quote:
|
Sending a spammer to jail is a waste of time and money.. they should spend more time with the people that are stealing identity. and no, not all spammers do this.
|
Quote:
think back 15 years ago. now go to a judge & say "we want you to put this guy in jail for sending a peice of mail, that dosent really exist, to a mailbox, again that dosent tangibly exist for longer then that guy who killed a few people" can you think of his response. |
Quote:
Computer crime resources are best spent on finding carders and sexual predators, not spammers and kiddies writing myspace worms. But then again, this country has a long tradition of locking up falsely convicted people, potsmokers, deadbeat parents, people who don't wear seatbelts, and people who don't pay parking fines. |
Quote:
You didnt have to say you're a spammer, its quite obvious. What you fail to realize (or admit) about spammers is that they are leaching off of other companies resources to sell their shit. Which makes them nothing more than thieves. Which is exactly why AOL wins these lawsuits. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Okay Mr IQ of 13, please tell me who pays for the bandwidth for your spamming? Certainly not you. |
these judgements make no sense. everyone says spam uses bandwidth, resources. well why not fine the spammer the cost of the bandwidth he used sending the emails off zombie PC's or the bandwidth used to download the messages.
personally i think the war against spam has nothing to do with the end user, no one cared about him before. why would they care now? its all about the government puppetry by the large ISP's who are losing a cut of their ad revenue. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
If your email box is set to accept mail from anyone with any IP, then its rather hypocritical to complain about bandwidth when mail from strangers shows up. If you are that concerned about bandwidth, just force a whitelist. |
LOL so funny to see people trying to Justify a criminal act.
If people subscribed to your service and paid you monthly for it then you may spam them of course but then that is not spam that is opting in. What right is it of any other individual to spam the client base of another company on the subsciption network? Courts figured that out pretty good I would say and have acted accordingly before this case with similer judgements. Fucken thieves. Not just thieves, annoying thieves. Not just fucking annoying thieves but possible individuals that send Adult Related content to Minors. There is not really a name for that kind of crime yet... |
Quote:
Spam doesn't affect me that much. I filter it out, and go on with my life. I find true junk mail to be many times more annoying, since there is nothing you can do to make it go away. |
Quote:
Which often protect the consumer and the working American citizen that pays for a service. Hey I know how about I just take over HBO for about 3 minutes a day... |
Quote:
So you think the only bandwidth used when someone spams is from the end user? That is the least of it. |
Quote:
And you're just a piece of shit adult webmaster trying to protect the "good name" of your "respected" industry. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
anti spammers rape donkeys & eat shit
:) :) |
Not only do they eat shit, they are homosexualz! :1orglaugh
http://img466.imageshack.us/img466/1529/antis34kv.jpg |
I get about 20-30 spam emails per day, maybe 10 of them end up in my mailbox, rest get filtered. So it's not really THAT bad, but for someone less knowledgable it can be a big problem. For example, my dad before I taught him how to work with the email on the internet, had his account up to 100s of spam emails per day, and that was within only a few months of getting on the internet. At that point his email address was just about unusable.
I have no idea how anyone can keep a straight face and say that everything is "ok" when that happens, and that the solution is to "just delete it." And even if you look at my 10 emails per day, it doesn't look like THAT much, but if it takes 5 seconds to delete each one, that's about 1 min a day. Over a year, that's around 360 mins or 6 hours. 6 hours wasted sorting through penis pills, porn sites, or mortgage deals that I would NEVER order anyway. |
wow!
I'm just wondering how much of that went to ATTORNEY'S FEES?! |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:19 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123