SpringThomas drama? WTF
 

THIS COMMUNIQUE HAS BEEN APPROVED BY BOTH THE ATTORNEY FOR MS. SPRING
THOMAS AS WELL AS THE ATTORNEYS FOR THE MANAGEMENT TEAM OF
SPRINGTHOMAS.COM: Both parties regretfully announce that effective
immediately, Ms. Thomas has resigned from her contract with
SpringThomas.com. A renegotiation is doubtful. Attorneys for Ms.
Thomas state that, on 4 December 2005, her privacy was compromised as
two cameras - a small surveillance camera, as well as a higher grade
camcorder - recorded her engaging in sexual activites with an unnamed
Africa-American male less than an hour before a scheduled scene for
SpringThomas.com. In addition, her attorneys contend that the model
release she signed - before entering the shower - only covers the
time she steps on set until the conclusion of the scene; the shower
was not an official set. Attorneys for Management state that any
sexual encounter recorded on the same date as a signed model release
is valid for publication on SpringThomas.com - whether or not Ms.
Thomas was aware the sexual act in question was, in fact, being
recorded. Both parties are uncertain as to her return, but both sides
are hoping for an amiable resolution. The management for
SpringThomas.com guarantees never-before-seen scenes through 15
January, 2006; they will also make an announcement on
SpringThomas.com by that date of her return - or her permanent
departure. Until then, thank you for your patience.


Thanks,
Tony


From my understanding this is the content in question
I planned on having her on YnotRadio for weeks now and it looks she will be on even in the myst of all this.

wow that's shitty of them to do

Ugh ? They've been running the site for years and they only got updates till the 15th ?!? What a bunch of fucking amateurs... I can't beleive this shit.

"...recorded her engaging in sexual activites with an unnamed
Africa-American male less than an hour before a scheduled scene..."

Horny chicks rule.

or this could be hype

But it sounds more like a publicity stunt then other things to me ...

ms thomas is correct though. You cant tape people doing stuff in the private life, even if its 1 minute before the scene and think you can use it as content, its risky cause you dont have a model release for the girl or guy.

couldn't have said it better

everyone loves the black cock

Obviously... I don't get why they did this too... no point ... they could have asked her to shoot that.

Maybe she's not getting nuff $ on the contract she signed initially and she's trying to get them for more ...

its just something they made up in their members area to make a scene look better or something, i dont think it was a good idea, but shit happens.

Haha, I smell BS

I saw her at the tanning salon the other day. I've seen Extreme Holly there too. I tan at web porn star central :)

you guys are such suckers


total Bullshit made up by them to create some sort of drama

:1orglaugh ya think?

Ya lots of people shower with no curtain and or the door open.... :uhoh Publicity stunt without question.

Hype? What kind of hype, to the 20k people on GFY?

lol total lame stunt.

Its a publicity stunt

first of all, why the hell would you have those kinds of hidden cameras in a model's shower? You would never be able to use the footage if they didn't make her sign papers... so whats the point?



Welcome to the new niche folks, fake reality porn!

marketing scheme...

lol .. well she once told me she only does black men on set ....

i think its bullshit drama, but we will see i guess.

good or bad...its still publicity

What's up with her make-up in that pic....... she looks like a damn Oompa-loompa.

looks like hype to me

you guys are as bad as surfers if you believe that... LMAO

No attorney would ever make a statement like that, unless that specific topic had been addressed in the release that she signed. If it had been addressed, then there wouldn't be any controversy, or question about the footage.

It also seems very odd that her attorney would agree to allow the footage in question to be made available to the public at all. This makes zero sense as well. Once it is offered publicly, she has suffered her claim.

That is the most fake "legal" notice I've ever seen.


Punker, Do you have any never before seen footage of your privacy being compromised as two cameras - a small surveillance camera, as well as a higher grade camcorder - recorded you engaging in sexual activities?

If you do have footage, I must insist that you make it available through 15
January, 2006. Thank you.

yea shes a hottie

And then we woke up and it was just a dream....
















or was it?

How humiliated she must be, to have been videotaped having sex with an "unnamed" black man. If we knew his name, would it be ok?

TRUE STORY... I was the first person to shoot Spring Thomas. She would only do topless pics for SweetApples.com, then like 2 weeks later she called me and asked if i wanted to see her first PORNO!!! I said "what????" LOL Why would you only shoot topless, then do hardcore? I cant remember what she replied, but it was funny. =)

This:

Makes the entire thing bullshit.

C'mon, you know nothing about make up dude!

Wait a minute, is this about the girl who claims to not like to fuck black men off camera yet her entire site has her fucking black men?

Looks staged.

Interesting... going to have to tag this in my brain....

Spring Thomas will be LIVE TODAY Jan. 12, 2006 @ 12pm PST www.YNOTRADIO.com

So we just had spring thomas on ynot and she stated that everything has been cleared up and she doesnt like it in the butt hole. hehehe

im looking forward to having her back on with her sister that should be hella interesting. :P