SOMEONE FROM PERFECT10.COM or MAC OR BUMBLE CONTACT ME!!FUCK IM PISSED!
 

I just noticed that google banned my domain cuz perffect10.com had a complaint about using their content. Joy Behrman and Kerri Kendal pics to be specific.

here`s the url where i`m on the banned list:
http://www.chillingeffects.org/notice.cgi?sID=898

ITS A FUCKING MAC AND BUMBLE FREE HOSTED GALLERY!!
I just downloaded the content and the template to make my own gallery to be more SE friendly. And i`m sending that traffic to macandbumble
how the fuck can this happend? I`ve had that domain listed at #1 for top keywords for years!

i had shitload of traffic, and all went to shit cuz of THIS?! I`ve never stolen content!

if anyone knows some peeps either at mac and bumble or perfect10 please contact them and tell them about this thread!
here`s my icq 176-868-775 or email me at [email protected]

good luck on the perfect10 thing, google probably banned anything with perfect10 in it because of that lawsuit...

as for mac and bumble, no clue, but that sucks ass dude!

http://www.chillingeffects.org/notice.cgi?sID=898

wow, that's a lot of banned sites

ouch i see some other sites that could be affected for doing nothing wrong also..

I dont even understand how google gets away with that shit when they themselves steal images with google images

Someone from perfect10 or macandbumble could have easily contact me.
I`ll remove all the pics they want!

i noticed they werent all banned...

kinghost.com
iwantanewgirlfriend.com ( big in serps )

This really sucks, sorry to hear about it

Fucking nettards.

Iwantanewgirlfriend.com has totally made google his bitch. Do you know who that is?

Only indexes were removed AND there is a way to apeal DMCA's.

This shit is old news guys, my page disappeared months ago. EDIT ok this is a seperate perfect10 one. Hes the other

http://www.chillingeffects.org/notice.cgi?sID=139

perfect10 are a bunch of retards. they threatened to sue on the assumption i had used their content because i run celeb sites. i never had anything of theirs and they never even took the time to check.

I do - he's a great affiliate of ours :) :thumbsup

Can some icq Eric from Bumblecash.com and point him to this thread?
I can see that he`s online right now but he doesnt respond to my msg`s.

what's his nick?

donald chase

I would be pissed. They owe you. Sue them.

How do you check to see if google has banned you?

donaldchase

It seems that google just removed my index page
The strange thing is i dont have any Pics of those models on that page.
I just have links pointing to those 2 urls/galleries. They should have removed those urls only. I dont give a fuck if they remove those gals, i`ll remove all of mac and bumble free content if needed. I just want my index back on google.

Sorry to hear this man, you can fill out the counter notice here:
http://www.chillingeffects.org/dmca/counter512.pdf

are you sure they are banned
because big sites like celebsdb.com seem to be indexed just fine
and they are on the list

a comment on hosted galleries
you can not download the pictures from hosted galleries and put them on your own domain
this is not legal
that is why it is not M&B's fault unless they own the content themselves and have the right to give it to affiliates
if its 3rd party content and only licensed to their domain this is why there is a problem now

That's fucked up, google should just start ignoring anything that comes from perfect10.

ya i know don, good guy, he owns over 10 sites

thebestporn is banned too heh

i Just did a quick check at bumblecash`s promo content and here`s what they offer
http://www.bumblecash.com/galleries.html
Basicly i did nothing wroing, ITS FREE CONTENT DAMNIT!
I just hope it wont take google months to get my index back to the serps
It will cost me shitload of money.

They send threatening letters to google all the time for content & shit they don't even own too.

all the free sites should band together and put them on their blacklist :). fuckin pricks, sorry to hear about you getting ousted. google drama can only be a bad thing.

Class action lawsuit is the only way you'll ever get anywhere with Zadeh. He's got too much time on his hands and he's already sued half the industry and won.

Perfect 10 is run by a guy with as much money as he has ego and its a huge amount.
Its always a good idea to work with sponsors that provide 100% of their own exclusive content just in case this sort of thing happens, after all its a real fucker when you spend all the time and energy building and promoting a site to have it banned in this way !

FYI - Mac & Bumble had nothing to do with this. I'm not really sure what's going on, but if someone was DMCA'ed for legitimate BumbleCash image usage, we'd like to know about it.

It looks like they bitched to google about their images showing in image searches. They listed the domains they came from so google could find them and google instead banned the sites from the SE. :1orglaugh

Has Mac and Bumble sold Zadeh images in the past? If you sold him non-exclusive rights to the same images, or you sold him exclusive rights to different images in the same sets, that would be my guess as to where it's coming from...

FHG's are Hosted on the sponsors hosting for a reason: There is license for THEM to host it. So unless the same exact content is also available as Free content, or if you already OWN the license for it, then it is a violation to download and host it yourself.

Otherwise, sponsors would simply have free content, and downloadable templates.

FHG != free content

BTW: I think this whole business of asking google to ban people is wrong. They should have emailed all of the domains and asked it to be removed instead (if it's in violation).

No ban here... we did something recently that fucked our SERPS. Should be back in a few days. :disgust

Upon further investigation, several of Mac & Bumble's domains have been banned as well. It appears that there are people getting caught up in a dispute between Perfect 10 and Google (including M&B). :-/

So, when model A works for perfect 10, and other companies, perfect 10 sues ppl who are using the same model? (and show up in the google search for model A)

Or am I reading this wrong?

Andre

After reading Big E's post, and the one from the other affiliate program, I'd say you're spot on...

M&B has never purchased any image - every single image was shot by an M&B photographer explicitly for M&B.

Okay clear, thanks

Perfect 10 actually DMCA'ed Google (images) for copyright infringement (Norm's got huge stones, damn). I guess all of this is a product of that act.

Perfect 10 has offered to petition Google to "re-enable" all M&B affiliates, so if you're an M&B affiliate, please email me ASAP.

also
http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showthread.php?t=561808

i dont think its that easy.. google has likely penalized those sites and they wont get their rank back like flipping a switch

Unfortunately, that's probably true.

You don't understand how they get away with it? It's their search engine, they can do what they want, ban who ever they want, with or without reason, there are no "search engine rights".

:2 cents:

They are using dmca complaints to remove listings, when the whole system of "google images" is one giant dmca complaint.

It would be like google owning a nude beach then handing out tickets to certain people for nudity. Sure they can do whatever they want its their search engine.. It doesnt mean i have to accept it or agree with it..

You're wrong. The sites aren't blacklisted. Only the root domain doesn't show but it does still has it's page rank. All other pages like galleries and archives are still there (oh irony also the ones with falsely claimed pictures).

did i say they were blacklisted ?

read closely , what you quoted..

not even true.
sites like thebestporn or celebsdb also have their roots indexed.
this is no banning
everybody stop calling it a banning

we have had 29 sites removed from google and a dozen from yahoo in the last 2 weeks for infringement on the paris hilton sex video - we are also aware that if we wrongfully dmca a site, that we could suffer legally later if the removed site owner pursues legal action.


you have recourse against a dmca filer if it is in error fyi is my point.