Racial Discrimination In Porn
 

www.lukeisback.com

Arena magazine has a feature on racism in porn. Clip clip clip.

Arena journalist Justin Quirk writes: "But incredibly, in the US, none of the biggest studio-contracted-stars, Jenna Jameson, Tera Patrick, Devon, Jesse Jane, etc -- do interracial. This anachronistic trend is inextricably linked with the rise of authoritarian Christian republicanism in America."

This is bollocks. The biggest porn stars have rarely done interracial (for the past 35 years, as long as there have been porn stars). This is not a trend. And it has nothing to do with "authoritarian Christian republicanism," whatever that is. What precisely is authoritarian about the Christian Right? They want to diminish your freedom to have an abortion and to consume porn. Aside from that, what established freedoms are they threatening?

The freedom-loving Justin Quirk writes:

Overt racism in US porn is nothing new. Black/white bigotry was evident in a much more base aspect into the early 1990s, with even [Lexington] Steele having his head superimposed on a monkey's body on the covers of some of his earliest films. Thankfully, this kind of rubbish is largely a thing of the past: it's difficult to imagine anyone today getting away with a production like Gregory Dark's Let Me Tell Ya About Black Chicks (1985) which culminated in a black woman getting double-penetrated by two white men in KKK robes.

So Quirk, who earlier argued against Christian authoritarianism, is now rejoicing that filmmakers have less freedom to create today than 20-years ago. Quirk and his leftist ilk do not care about freedom. They care about legislating their morality. That's fine. I and those on the Right want to legislate our morality as well. What matters is the specifics of what we want to legislate. Freedom is a great value. It is not the ultimate one (unless you are a libertarian).

In my 2004 book The Producers: Profiles in Frustration, I learned that filmmakers have far less freedom to create today than in the 1950s. Is the Right behind Political Correctness? Is it the Right that pushes Hollywood to only put cigarettes in the hands of bad guys?

Quirk writes:

Sadly, echoes of this racial stereotyping still exist today, albeit in a more insidious form -- even among the directors who do shoot interracial. Films like Gangland play on the staple right-wing stereotype of white women straying into bad neighborhoods and falling foul of marauding packs of African-Americans...

What if the stereotype is factually correct? Do you hear about gangs of white men raping black women? The instances of black men raping white women are far higher in the United States than white men raping black women.

Even Jesse Jackson said that if he was walking in a bad part of town and he saw a gang of youths following him, he'd worry if they were black.

Is it the fault of whites that blacks in the US commit a disproportionate rate of violent crime?

What do you think would happen if a young attractive women walked alone through a bad black neighborhood? The brothers would want to discuss poetry with her?

I'd love to see Justin Quirk (and those who think like him) send their young white attractive female loved-ones alone into tough black neighborhoods and let these girls walk around for a few hours and see what happens to them.

The biggest problem with that scenario is that the innocent women would pay the price for Quirk's willful stupidity.

Remember the Chris Rock joke -- what do you say to someone who calls you and says, "I'm on Martin Luther King Blvd. I'm lost. What should I do?" Run!

Is it the fault of whites or Christians that most Martin Luther King Blvds (wherever they are in the United States) are not somewhere most people would like to live? The real estate is cheap. I wonder why?

There are many interesting related issues here. Would you like to live on Hooker Alley? Would you like to live on a street where there are lots of sex shops? Would you like to live in a community where the average person spends two hours a day masturbating to pornography? If you are a pornographer, would you like to live among your most ardent fans?

Note how in the Arena article Lexington Steele is portrayed in only the glowing terms. This is typical white leftist patronizing of blacks.

Lex is not a saint.

I've only had positive interactions with the guy. I like him. He's number one at what he does, but he's a complete human being. How many porn girls have started bleeding from having sex with Lex (because he's so big)? A lot. I've seen it a couple of times on set. They bleed, not because Lex is vicious, but because he's abnormally big and many women can't comfortably accommodate his penis.

Why is busting open chicks (white or black) till they bleed a good thing?

Quirk writes: "Meanwhile, in an equally blatant act of discrimination, black female performers are routinely paid 25 per cent less than their white counterparts."

That's because consumers prefer to buy porn starring non-black women. Performers are free to sell their services on the open market. If there's an extraordinary profit to be made from shooting black chicks, plenty of pornographers will shoot them.

Life discriminates. For instance, white women are far more likely to date black men than white men are to date black women. White men are more interested in dating Asian women than black women.

The biggest porn stars have always been white. The most popular beauties and movie stars in the world have always been white. This is not an American phenomenon. Aside from a handful of exceptions, black leads don't create box office either in the US or overseas. Few non-blacks watch TV starring blacks (the Cosby Show as an exception).

They all have their preferences..some won't fuck strange guys or hardcore etc.That's not discrimination

I don't know about discrimination, I know about business.

In the gay marketplace, black asian latino etc. etc. simply does not sell as well as white. Races other than white, for that reason, are considered "niche" and are mainly promoted with "niche traffic" dedicated to those races.

For me, it's about the bottom line, which is something that the consumer dictates.

who cares? WCP has no problem with finding and shoooting interracial scenes and are a leader in ethnic and interracial scenes

It's just business. Cha ching.

im an equal oppurtunity destroyer :)

Duke

Most amazingly hot white girls dont do black guys.

Thats just how it is.

its what sells plain and simple. Nothing more, also its also a porn stars right what she wants to and not do.

I dont blame Katelin for not taking 14 inches of meat that could destroy her small vagina...


www.biggestdickinporn.com

Yeah it is descrimination. We all descriminate. I don't find many black women attractive. Some women (not many :winkwink: ) don't find me attractive. Descrimination is OK. :2 cents:

EDIT: Interracial is probably harder to sell. Same reason Jenna doesn't have a lot of deformed midget porn. Harder to sell.

Wonder if Luke found a ride and a roommate to be his sugar daddy for Internext?

lol, where did you get that from?

fuck all that nonsense. InterracialMafia.com is coming Spring 2006. word is born :)

ya on screen :2 cents:

Im not suprised.

just like any other industry or organizations its open to things like racism and discrimination.

Hi all. My name is Judy. I'm an Asian American woman and a serious student of sociology. The reason I came to this site (specifically this thread), is to inform the people here about the research I have been doing for severals years (of which led me to this thread and many other online discussions of related issues that are addressed in my wider research concerning the racial paradigm affecting society today). I want to warn all of you though that this is a long post and so I don't expect people to read it completely after one sitting. Anyways after this post I must leave as this site is really not my cup of tea nor pornography in general. I only came here to inform you of my important research which is relevant to this thread. I also feel that it is not required for me to stay and defend my points, simply because my points are based on academic facts that are archived in various universities, thus establishing the scientific credibility of my arguements (meaning they are undebatable and therefore cannot be debunked). Anyways I have posted my academic references at the end of the entirety of this post. Please keep in mind as well that since I'm a new member here and will leave as soon as I'm done with this post, this site cannot permit me to post URLS unless I post at least 30 times -- which I won't). With that being said, let me begin.

You see as an Asian American woman, I always found it quite odd that so many other Asian American women as well as Non-White women in general happen to be romantic partners as well as sexual partners to White Men more than they are to Non-White men in general, especially when it comes to the entertainment industry like in movie roles, or in the world of general commercialism. And this is why I decided to undertake the research a few years back into the racist paradigm that causes such unnatural statistics to continue to increase. And then I also started to wonder why the term "colored people" only refers to Non-White people. And then I eventually wondered why the term "inter-racial porn" usually only applies to pornography that involves a Non-White man having sex with either another Non-White female of another race, or with a White female, but it never ever applies to a White man having sex with any Non-White female. These term strikes me as very odd and so I decided to investigate what causes this.

It turns out that White men are not included in these terms because White men are presented in a clever way through a media agenda that implies that White Men are the "default", "norm", or "standard" for all things in entertainment. This directly suggests that White men are the central point in every venue so as to establish an image of normalcy, thus the perception that anyone who is not a White Male is "exotic", "different", or in some way "less significant". In fact the standardization of the White Male image is also predominant in many other things (not just in pornography and movies) but in software as well. For example, most video game lead characters are White (and most specifically a White Male). In addition to video games, there are also cgi 3d head modelling software. I have seen and tested these softwares and when a user opens the program to modify from a pre-existing default head, the head is a Caucasian Head. In addition to software, White defaultness is evident in toys as well.

Just look at Barbie and Ken. They are White and are usually blonde and blue-eyed. Of course not to say that there are Non-White Barbie dolls around, but my point is that the when people perceive Barbie, they will automatically usually see a Blonde-Blue Eyed White doll. You see my point here? My point is that society has been conditioned by the White imagery by the media and commercialism. The more this happens -- the more these images persist and are sold to the public -- the more it (Whiteness) becomes the underlying established normality in society. And because Whiteness continues to become an underlying established normality in society through the repetitive presentation of these images, the more people will become subconsciously attracted to Whiteness. Hence the result in "Whiteness sells". Well of course it sells, it's because people have been unnaturally and deceptively CONDITIONED to subconsciously perceive Whiteness as the ideal beauty in society.

This is also the very reason why so many Asians and other Non-White people try to be White (because they feel that they would perceive their ownselves as normal and beautiful if they looked and acted more "White" so to speak). This the reason why so many Asians color their hair blonde or light brown and why so many of them undergo eye-lid surgery and nose-job surgery to mimic the Caucasian look. These subtle forms of internalized racism (racism to one's own race) are really direct reactions to the Whiteness Racist Paradigm that has affected much of the globe. Of course, when it comes down it, the modernt Whiteness Racist Paradigm that is present in today's world is a direct creation of Global European Imperialism that has dominated the globe in the last 2, 3, or 4 centuries prior to this one. It is also because of Global European Imperialism that has allowed White Men to be established in the highest positions in authority to run and own major institutions worldwide, including in the fields of Mass Media ownership, Central Banking/ Economics, Politics, Education/Science, etc.

Lack of racial diversity in the highest media positions:

A survey during the 1990's which was conducted by FAIR reported that 80% of ABC's Nightline guests were professionals, while 89% of those professionals were male, and 92% of those males were White. Fair then continued to find consistent numbers done for other shows as well. For example, 90% of the guests in PBS's Macneil and Lehrer NewsHour were White, while 87% of those guests were male, 67% of those men were from the government. In 1996, there was a survey that reflected the numbers of the subjects interviewed in American network news to be around 86% for White men.

Such statistics are consistent with the argument that White men seem to be the leading force behind the structures of the mainstream media: " White journalists dominate the mainstream media; and White people hold most creative positions in the entertainment media as actors, writers and directors. All these factors contribute to the prevalence of Whiteness in media, and help to reinforce White privilege as the norm....Most mainstream media content also reinforces White privilege by featuring White characters and addressing white interests and experiences. When programming does feature non-white characters, they usually appear in supporting roles."

Furthermore, historical Global European Imperialism / Colonialism has played an enormous role in conditioning humanity into perceiving "Whiteness" as the standard for all things in the world so to speak. Truth is, being Non-White is only strange to those who have been conditioned by the false social hierarchy of White Normalcy that has been deceptively installed in society by way of historical Global European Imperialism/Colonialism and the establishment mass media (which is owned by mostly White Men).
And their preferences are usually White men. Ever stopped to ask why? Is this natural? Is it natural for most Non-White women to prefer White Men as their sexual partners in movies and in porn more than their very own Male racial counterparts? Most of the time? Let me tell you as a Non-White female, it is definitely NOT natural. The reason why most Non-White women prefer White men as sexual partners is because they have been deceptively conditioned (subconsciously) through historical Global European Imperialism/Colonialism and through the standardization of Whiteness "Normalcy" subjective propaganda via the predominantly White Male Owned mass media.

It is because of this mass conditioning through the repetition of White Ideals that so many people around the world (regardless of their race or gender) subconsciously perceive White people as the standard and norm of humanity, thus making people also falsely believe that White men are the ideal male standard above all other men. Society has been severely conditioned on a subconscious level and this the point that I'm trying to present in my research right here. These conditions are not natural. They are man-made and no matter how one tries to avoid the facts, the facts are, that these conditions are dishonest, corrupted, and sinister. Such conditions have no room for true racial equality and thus it's time to inform the public of these covert racist dynamics.

Continued.....

Again, let me re-emphasize -- it is because of this widespread mass conditioning of Whiteness "Normalcy" on society that so many Non-White Women favor White Men more than their very own Racial Male Counterparts in the film and entertainment industry (including porn). A clear example of this effect is evident in Asian American females and their high tendency to be submissive towards White Men, more than Men from other races. A lot of Asian women have been unnaturally conditioned by the White Man's perspective through his media for a very long time. This is NOT a natural thing. Let me repeat, it is NOT A NATURAL TENDENCY for the majority of Asian women (and women in general) to be most submissive towards White Men more than any other Man belonging to any other race. In truth, this tendency is an UNNATURAL CONDITION installed by way of Cultural Imperialism maintained by persistent Whiteness imagery that is spread through the White Male owned media and through the process of ethnic cleansing evident in Global European Imperialism/colonialism from past centuries.

Women catering to white men more than with non-white men onscreen (Please keep in mind that this is a manipulated tendency in many women. It is NOT a natural tendency, because it is a MANIPULATED behavior caused by subconscious Mass Conditioning from the predominantly White Male Owned Media) :

Observations have also been made on the fact that most Non-White actresses in western media have kissed and made out with White Men in movies, commercials, fashion, etc. more than they ever have with Non-White men in those same fields of entertainment. The pattern of White male protagonists usually outnumbering Non-White male protagonists in films (especially romantic films) while pairing up with women (whether those women are Asian, Black, Latina, White, or Multi-racial, etc.) might be suspect in the current movie and/or television careers of Jessica Alba, Tia Carrere, Thandie Newton, Jennifer Lopez, Jennifer Aniston, and Kristin Laura Kreuk to name a just a few. Again, there are just too many of these "coincidences" to list them all here.

Such "coincidental" observations are considered to be too consistent and widespread amongst the majority of female stars in the entire entertainment business as well. Many believe that these women for the most part, usually do sex scenes with White men onscreen much more than with Non-White men. There may also be another disturbing pattern which is gaining the attention of the public. That pattern is described as having White men doing love scenes with Non-White women in action movies more than Non-White men (especially Asian men) do love scenes with the women of their same race in western romantic films. Here is a listing of various movies, television shows, or onscreen projects which have some of Hollywood's leading ladies romantically pairing up with White male protagonists only:

Jennifer Lopez

· Maid in Manhattan
· Shall We Dance?
· Monster in Law
· The Wedding Planner
· Gigli
· Angel Eyes

Jessica Alba

· Into the Blue
· Sin City
· Idle Hands
· The Sleeping Dictionary
· Fantastic Four
· Dark Angel

Note: Jessica Alba has been paired romantically with a Non-White male character before in the movie "Honey" (2003_. Mekhi Phifer (a Black actor) played "Chaz" who was romantically involved with Jessica's character "Honey Daniels" and Tia Carrere has been romantically paired in a recent film titled "Back in the Day". However, there are still too many females (including Jessica Alba who never (on a consistent basis) are romantically paired up or cast as intimate characters for Non-White male characters in any of the majority of their movies, television shows, or onscreen projects. Jennifer Lopez has been known to have gotten intimate with many Non-White men in many of her onscreen projects throughout her entertainment career; although for the most part, her romantic films have her only pairing up with White men (and she has done at least 6 romantic films in recent years).

It is also because of the Mass Media that so many false negative stereotypes have been used on so many social groups in today's world. Of course whether negative stereotypes are sometimes only intended to be jokes or not, they usually have severe ramifications on society because they influence the the direction of social identities on people's perceptions. This negative dynamic is termed "STEREOTYPE THREAT" and such facts are irrefutable -- again, they cannot be debated, as they have been consistently documented, reviewed, and archived by highly credible top Universities for many many years. Do a google on the term "Stereotype Threat".

As you can see based on the academic sources above, the repetition of negative images and portrayals of Non-White people not only greatly affects many Non-White people's self-esteem and esteem for their own race -- which in turn may affect their abilities to succeed in society, it also greatly establishes the underlying social standard identified as "White Privilege". Do a google on the term "White Privilege".

You can research the subtlety of "Whiteness" and its unnatural mass conditioning on humanity's perception that said race is subconsiously perceived as the "Standards for Humanity". Simply put, it has corrupted the very fabric of the human consensus on race equality: ). Below is an excerpt from the paper titled "Whiteness in America: a State of Racelessness and Culturelessness"(read carefully and take those points to heart):

Whites are the "standard" humans against which all other humans are compared:

An example of how Westerners see themselves as the norm for humanity is our usage of the term "world music" - often used to refer to music originating outside Western Europe/USA. It makes one think that Western Europe/USA is not part of the world. Western music is "default, normal" music. Other music is "world music." The use of term "international student", referring to foreign student, follows the same logic. One can only conclude that the U.S. is not part of the "international" scene, and that each foreign student belongs fully to the "international scene", not just to his/her individual country.

Another term whose common usage I find annoying is "tribe" or "tribal". A tribe is a unit of political organization - the number 1 definition for "tribe" in Webster's dictionary is "esp. among preliterate peoples, a group of persons, families, or clans believed to be descended from a common ancestor and forming a close community under a leader, or chief." In casual American conversation, the word "tribal" has little to do with political organization. You hear phrases like "tribal music", "tribal clothing" and "tribal dance", which beg the question, "which tribe?"

If you look at the context in which the word "tribal" was used thus, you would find that the speakers are almost always talking about African, Native American, Asian, Pacific Islander or aboriginal Australian cultures. While tribal affiliations sometimes exist, or did exist in these cultures, it must be remembered that Europeans organized themselves as tribes too. In fact, the word "tribe" originated from the 3 groups into which Romans were originally divided. The everyday use of "tribe" and "tribal" in American speech has become so tainted with the image of the primitive savage that some Americans of African descent have asked that the word "tribe" not be used in referring to African descent groups, preferring the phrase "ethnic group".

When we talk about "ethnic" food, we commonly mean non-European food, like Indian food, Mexican food and Vietnamese food. We usually don't call French food or Irish food "ethnic food". It seems like we think whites don't have ethnicity. This attitude amazes me and I have always wondered where it comes from.

One Drop of Blood proposes that since the frontier days, "racelessness" has been the prerequisite towards becoming truly American. Paradoxically, it was at the same time taken for granted that the true American can only be white. Malcolmson describes the contradiction:

... only "white" immigrants were eligible for citizenship. When Brandeis said that the United States alone "recognizes racial equality as an essential of full human liberty," he immediately followed with, "It has, therefore, given like welcome to all the peoples of Europe."... Americanizers did not, however, advocate a white America. Neither did Brandeis...Americanizers were against racial identity... Races were what European immigrants had and would go beyond... To be American was to be raceless... The people who, by general consensus, had races... were non-whites.

If anyone here has not yet read the book "One Drop of Blood: The American Misadventure of Race" by Scott Malcolmson, you should really do so since it does address the issue very clearly. It addresses the racial identity in America and the underlying established social norm that is "Whiteness" and "White Racelessness" -- a destructive mentality that is often subconsiously accepted by the masses as the standard for Americans and Humanity in general. The book also addresses the subject about the term "Colored People" for "Non-White People" being used to condition society in order to specialize "Whites" as being colorless and therefore the default standard for general society.

"One Drop of Blood: The American Misadventure of Race" addresses the very subject of the Construction of "Whiteness" and its infiltration into general society posing as the underlying standard and norm for humanity.

Continued....

Most people just don't want to watch shaved gorillas having sex. I'm sorry, but that's the way it's been since the beginning of time and that's the way it will be thousands of years in the future when the only remaining humans are in some alien zoo somewhere.

Also please do a google Sociology Professor Darrell Hamamoto from the University of California at Davis. He has research the racist paradigm that has enveloped much of the media. There is an article about him online which talks about his studies on this very issue. You will have to do research on your own instead of relying on me to give you links in this post. Anyways in the online article about him regading this issue, he talks about the racial biases in the pornographic industry and why such a racial bias is really an unnatural sociological dynamic that has been deceptively installed by the predominantly White Male owned entertainment industry. The author of the article also gives some suggestions on how to take progressive steps to fix the problem and therefore establish racial equality in the porn industry as well as in the general industry of media itself:

I just want to point out an excerpt from said paper: "Lei, who is part Thai and part Cambodian, has long brown hair that frames a wide smile and meshes seamlessly with her dark bronze complexion. Chun is a tall, strapping Korean-American who exudes a youthful charm on the screen. Lei said Chun was her first Asian male costar and she enjoyed the experience. ?I feel like when it?s Asian and Asian, it?s more comfortable,? Lei says. ?I don?t feel awkward when I kiss him.?

More statements in that academic article reads as follows: ]"Asian-American sexuality has been damaged by years of colonialism and racism that has turned Asian women into a sexual fetish and Asian men into eunuchs. Asian-Americans have internalized these attitudes, Hamamoto says, causing a rift between the genders and perpetuating the stereotypes."

More excerpts:

]?The whole sexuality part of our lives is warped and deformed from larger white racism,? he said. ?I want Asian-American people to look at it and examine it themselves, take matters in their own hands and come up with a solution.?

?I think there are two different things going on here: the image of Asian-American male sexuality and power. Who controls what is sexy in film, and basically what is sexy, is defined by white guys,? says Joyce Guan, who works at the Asian-American Telecommunications Association, and had just seen ?Masters of the Pillow,? a documentary about the making of Hamamoto?s porn video. ?Seeing an Asian-American male in a film or in roles where they are sexual is a good thing.?

But those roles in porn or mainstream entertainment are lacking, largely because film studios, movie producers and TV news directors assume that Asian-American men can?t hold an audience.

Much of what is produced in the mass media is created for the pleasure of white men, according to Elaine Kim, an Asian-American studies professor at the University of California at Berkeley. ?[White men] can have every woman of every race. For Asian men, they?re just not supposed to be men...?

Anyways, this is a long post, but it is an educational post nonetheless. I do not expect people to read this post with a playful heart. This is very serious stuff that needs to be addressed, researched, and dealt with. I have a lot of peers from all races. I hold no anger towards any race in particular. All I want is true equality in our world that is natural and free-flowing without manipulations and distortions -- and in order to take progressive steps towards such a goal, people must become aware of the detrimental subtleties being intentionally fed to human society so as to condition the masses into accepting a false social hierarchy of race superiority and inferiority. The research I provided is supported by a large amount of academic sources (and you will find more sources online and in various libraries in your community, schools, colleges, universities, etc. as well, if you all do the independent research on your own). My references are listed in the next post below. Thanks for your time.

,Judy

References:

The White Media as a conditioning tool to reshape the minds of society in order to elevate the image of White Men globally:

Friedman, Lester. Unspeakable Images: Ethnicity and the American Cinema. Urbana: U of Illinois P, 1991.
Doheny Stacks; Leavey PN1995.9.M56U57
Miller, Randall. Ethnic Images in American Film and Television. Philadelphia: Balch, 1978.
Cinema-TV PN1995.9.M56E86
Toplin, Robert. Hollywood as Mirror: Changing Views of "Outsider" and "Enemies" in American Movies. Westport: Greenwood, 1993. Cinema-TV PN1995.9.M56H65
Woll, Allen. Ethnic and Racial Images in American Film and Television: Historical Essays and Bibliography. New York: Garland, 1987. Cinema-TV; Leavey Z5784.M9W65
Branch, Taylor. Parting the Waters: America in the King Years 1954-63. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1988.
"Eyes on the Prize: America's Civil Rights Years 1954-1965." (Video series)
Loewen, James. Lies My Teacher Told Me: Everything Your American History Textbook Got Wrong. New York: Touchstone, 1996.
Takaki, Ronald. A Different Mirror: A History of Multicultural America. Boston: Little, Brown, 1993.
Franklin, John Hope. From Slavery to Freedom: A History of African Americans. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1994.
Harding, Vincent. There is a River: The Black Struggle for Freedom in America. New York: Vintage, 1983.
Washington, James M. A Testament of Hope: The Essential Writings and Speeches of Martin Luther King, Jr. New York: Harper Collins, 1986.
X, Malcolm. The Autobiography of Malcolm X. New York: Grove Press, 1965.
Acuna, Rodolfo. Occupied America: A History of Chicanos. New York: Harper, 1988.
Native American (American Indian and Alaska Native)
Brown, Dee. Bury My Heart at Wounded Knee: An Indian History of the American West. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1971.
Deloria, Vine. Custer Died for Your Sins: An Indian Manifesto. University of Oklahoma Press, 1988.
Jaimes, M. Annette, ed. The State of Native America: Genocide, Colonization and Resistance. Boston: South End Press, 1992.
Smith, Paul Chaat and Robert Allen Warrior. Like a Hurricane: The Indian Movement from Alcatraz to Wounded Knee. New York: The New Press, 1996.
Takaki, Ronald. Strangers from a Different Shore: A History of Asian Americans. Boston: Little, Brown, 1998.

Selected Essays & Articles

Who Invented White People (by Gregory Jay)?
Whites swim in racial preference (by Tim Wise)
White Privilege: Unpacking the Invisible Knapsack (by Peggy McIntosh)
Articles and essays on race, racism, and white privilege (by Robert Jensen)
Diversity vs. White Privilege (by C. Sleeter)
What Should White People Do? (by Linda Martin Alcoff)
Whiteness Studies: an Attempt at Healing
The Preference of White Privilege (by Kimberle W. Crenshaw)
Whites in Multicultural Education: Rethinking Our Role (by Gary R. Howard)
A Long History of Affirmative Action--for Whites
White Identity and Race Relations in the 1990's (by Ashley W. Doane, Jr.)
Sisseton, South Dakota: Dynamics of Whiteness in a Dakota Indian/White Community (senior thesis and website by Joanna Calhoun Horton)

The Non-White image distorted by the White Media in order to fit the preferences of Whiteness Culture and elevate the White Male image::

Marchetti, Gina. Romance and the 'Yellow Peril': Race, Sex, and Discursive Strategies in Hollywood Fiction. Berkeley: U of California P, 1993. Leavey PN1995.9.A78M37
Wong, Eugene F. On Visual Media Racism: Asians in the American Motion Pictures. New York: Arno, 1978. Cinema-TV; Doheny PN1995.9.A78w6
Asians/Asian Americans in Film and Television: A Short Bibliography of Materials in the UC Berkeley Libraries
Auster, Albert and Leonard Quart. How the War was Remembered: Hollywood and Vietnam. NY: Praeger Publishers, 1988.
Berg, Rick. "Losing Vietnam: Covering the War in an Age of Technology." In From Hanoi to Hollywood: The Vietnam War in American Film, edited by Linda Dittmar and Gene Michaud, 41-68. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 1990.
Bernardi, Daniel. The Birth of Whiteness: Race and the Emergence of U.S. Cinema.New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 1996.
Bernstein, Matthew and Gaylyn Studlar, eds. Visions of the East: Orientalism in Film. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 1997.
Conn, Peter. (1996). Pearl S. Buck [Online], 12 paragraphs. [1999, May 11].
Dissanayake, Wimal, ed. Colonialism and Nationalism in Asian Cinema. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1994.
Dittmar, Linda and Gene Michaud. "America's Vietnam War Films: Marching Toward Denial." In From Hanoi to Hollywood: The Vietnam War in American Film, edited by Linda Dittmar and Gene Michaud, 1-18. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 1990.
Dittmar, Linda and Gene Michaud, eds. From Hanoi to Hollywood: The Vietnam War in American Film. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 1990.
Dong, Qingwen. "Self, Identity, Media Use and Socialization: A Study of Adolescent Asian Immigrants to the United States." Ph.D. diss., Washington State University, 1995.
Feng, Peter. "Memories of our Ancestors: Storytelling and Asian American Cinematic Autobiography." Ph.D. diss., Iowa University, 1996.
Friedman, Lester D., ed. Unspeakable Images: Ethnicity and the American Cinema. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press, 1991.
Fuller, Karla Rae. "Hollywood Goes Oriental:CaucAsian Performance in American Cinema." Ph.D. diss., Northwestern University, 1997.
Hamamoto, Darrell. Nervous Laughter: Television Situation Comedy and Liberal Democratic Ideology. NY: Praeger Publishers, 1989.
Isaacs, Harold Robert. Scratches on Our Minds: American Images of China and India. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, Inc., 1980.
Lee, Joann. "Changing Shades of the 'Yellow Peril': Asian American Actors in the 1990s, an Ethnographic Case Study." Ph.D. diss., New York University, 1997.
Leong, Russell. Moving the Image: Independent Asian Pacific American Media Arts. U.S.: Linda Mabalot, 1991.
Marchetti, Gina. Romance and the "Yellow Peril":Race, Sex, and Discursive Strategies in Hollywood Fiction. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1993.
Mark, Diane Mei Lin. "Pearls: A History of Asians in America" (this source was a supplement to a television series and did not state its publisher).
Moy, James S. Marginal Sights: Staging the Chinese in America. Iowa City, Iowa: University of Iowa Press, 1993.
(Oishi, Eve B. "The Memory Village: Fakeness and Authenticity in Asian American Fiction, Film, and Video." Ph.D. diss., Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, 1996.
Seel, Peter. Hollywood Goes to China: Gender Stereotypes of Chinese Characters in Leading Roles. Washington, D.C., 1993.
Torres, Sasha, ed. Living Color: Race and Television in the United States. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1998.
Wong, Eugene Franklin. On Visual Media Racism: Asians in the American Motion Pictures.. NY: Arno Press, 1978.

Cliff notes:


Sociology Student wants the white dick

ROFL @ sociology student... you really think anyone is going to read 1/10 of that here? It's almost as if you POSTED A BOOK... and we all know that books are for fags. :321GFY

What a bunch of worthless garbage!

Intelligent response... Shows your complete lack of maturity. Funny how you would respond so quickly despite the fact that the post I just provided would have taken a person several hours to research considering all the academic references I provided as well. It proves that you did not even bother reading a single statement of my post.

Furthermore, your pathetic commentary really illustrates the level of intelligence of this community. I'm not surprised though since this is a pornographic community. The only reason why I'm passing by is because I was doing research on the racist paradigm in the media. The google results showed up and happened to display this thread because it had a relevant subject matter concerning racism and racial discrimination. Don't be so arrogant to think that white men are the most attractive in this world. They are not nor do I perceive as such. I treat all men equally regardless of race.

Learn to be more polite to people who simply want to educate others about the important issues that attempt to dissect the racial paradigm that already oppressed so many socieities and cultures worldwide. Grow up little kiddies. You have much to learn about life. The whole world does not revolve around White Men. I have to go.

,Judy.

Two words....Tool Box:thumbsup

Two words.... Ketchup Briefcase:thumbsup

We know Judy, we know.

Disxcrimination on miniature dick is the only discrimination I know on porn.

I actually read it. Very interesting findings.

I feel bad for the Asian males more than any others. They get the short end of the stick every time.

Oh, wait, no pun intended.

Let's just say that with the way most black folks treat chicks, it's just fucking normal ...

its their body its thier right

Its about the girls preference, they probably do Discriminate

oh damn......

Judy, if you read this, please email me. There are a number of rather large fallacies in your argumentation, as well as some basic academic principles you do not seem to be familiar with. Your research subject is interesting, however, and therefore I'm willing to give you some advice.

kallikles AT gmail DOT com

A lot of their core fans would get mad by seeing them touch an impure black cock.

But, considering they are TV whores I'm sure they have fucked their fair share of black men off camera.

Interracial is hot.

:thumbsup

That just destroyed my selfconfidence.

You need to ask for a refund from your university.

Most in the behavioral sciences are fully aware that the concept of "race" is a misnomer. Morphological characteristics are not found in tandem. The idea of "race" is one perpetuated at it's core by the philosophies of galton and other eugenicists to this day to differentiate ethnic groups, for whatever reason, based on morphological differences. Using those differences to pre determine both physiological and psychological characteristics between ethnic groups, regardless of cultural or environmental differences.

Take exploitedasianteens.com to your "supposed" prof.

It's a favorite of mine.

:1orglaugh

I agree. Especially when the gorillas' skin underneath is white. Nobody really wants to fuck that. Only if the said chick is given a huge wad of cash and some dope to get her through the session, though...

Well, "Hot" is subjective. Some guys think "amazingly hot" is having enormous fake tits, with no hips or ass--you know, like a young boy, or Pamela Anderson. Even then, a lot of these amazingly hot tranny lookalikes are seen with black guys more frequently than you'd like to believe.

Show us your tits

No wonder. It is everywhere :(

wow.............

Thanks to the internet, you can get and/or make any kind of porn you want withouit worrying about what the big video companies want...You don't need them to view it and you don't need them to distribute it....

Therefore, I couldn't give two shits about what some pornstar wants to do.

Ther isn't racism in porn. Reverse racism maybe. I can't watch a god damned porn movie nowadays with seeing same nasty black cock in it. Only 1/8 the population is black and I can gurantee you more than 1/8 of the dicks are black. Go get 100 scenes at random, count the # of dudes and see if more than 1/8 of them are black.

lol :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

Yeah, that Silvia Saint is a fucking dog.

A) he said MOST

B) really she isn't anything special. Blonde, too much make-up and fake tits. WOW haven't seen that before.

Debate all you want, but I go out to the bar with only 10 white chicks and 50 white guys and I get laid and the White guys just stand there looking stupid.

Some chicks may not want to fuck a brother on camera but they sure dive for a niggas dick when the camera aint on.

I think some people in the industry dont want to deal with reality and the models and re-acting to keep themselves in good standing with producers.

I had serveral girls tell me that white men had said they would never date them if they knew they ever fucked a black man. So I think that's the issue. It's about what white men force on white women and not that white women are discriminating. They are protecting themselves from white male persecution.