High Ranking Military Officers Agree That The Wtc Was Not Hit By Flight 175
 

HIGH RANKING MILITARY OFFICERS AND AIRLINE PILOTS AGREE THAT THE SOUTH TOWER WAS NOT HIT BY FLIGHT 175

'Col. George Nelson USAF (ret.), who has 30 years of experience identifying aircraft and aircraft parts stated, ?The plane that hit the south tower on 9/11 was not United Airlines (UA) flight 175?. After reviewing numerous video clips and photographs of the 9/11 attacks, he concluded, ?That was not a commercial airliner. The planes were substituted.? This shocking conclusion is also being echoed by other military officers and commercial airline pilots.'


Amidst the heated debate of the controversial issues discussed in the documentary "911 - In Plane Site", two former military experts join Dave on The Power Hour to discuss the validity of the questions posed... AND they offer a few answers of their own!

Col. George Nelson, USAF (ret.) an expert in the field of aircraft identification for 30 years, and "Bob" an electro-physicist with a masters degree in optics and a 33 year veteran working for the Department of Defense in the missile defense program, both discuss the "pod", the "flash", the pentagon damage and express their opinions as to whether planes that hit the WTC were even commercial aircraft!

This show is a MUST LISTEN for all who question the official story of 911!

http://www.thepowerhour.com/news2/replay_aug8_2005.htm

And for all your brainwashed folks who think its a conspiracy theory...
Put your foot in your mouth... and start researching, like intelligent people do... Unlike the sheeple who follow the masses... and cant think for themselves, so they believe the tv.

Alive and kicking!
http://home.no.net/holodoc/ordinary1.jpg

Yep makes perfect sense.














NOT AT ALL. Don't turn a tragedy into a contoversy.

wow, I agree, put on tin foil hat now

HAHAHAHAH :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

So what youre saying is that Flight 175 and its crew and all the passengers were actually abducted by aliens with some kinda of ray from a high hovering spaceship, with cloaking on of course since no one remmbers seeing it. Or maybe they were using a mass hypnosis ray too. Hmmm Makes ya wonder dont it.

ThePowerHour is biased as a mo fo. I don't even know why you decided to post that crap.

Anyone ever seen "911 - In Plane Site"? It's fucking freaky - in the video clips they show (most of which were broadcast live on 9/11) of the second aircraft crashing it really doesn't look like the passenger jet it's claimed to be...

That vid was total crap. Have you seen "Fahrenhype 911"? :winkwink:

You Agree, because you dont want to think, You want the government and media to think for you. Then you agree to what you are told to think.
Thats the Definition of a sheeple.. A person... but follows the heard like a sheep. the heard follows the shepard which in this case is the illuminati controlled media and illuminati controlled Government, who have spent the better part of 60 years perfecting mind control and social engineering programs, like the one that is running in your head right now! LOL!

Crap?
Seems you havent seen it!

Everyone is biased... even you .
You seem to be biased against them, or you wouldnt have said what you just did. So why do you post then?

conspiracy theorist elitists like massiveschlock all have 3 things in common when they open their traps:

1. they pick out a tiny part of a larger event and say "see there! how do you explain that" and are unable to openly evaluate the entire event

2. they offer no viable alternative scenario or explanation as to what happened instead. i.e. happened to the aircraft in question

3. they distract from their weak argument by pointing fingers at those who disagree calling them names like *sheeple* and telling them they are *brainwashed* and *can't think for themselves*

Nobody really knows... and nobody can't do shit about it. We just need to let america clean up their dirty laundry they will take care of themselveso r die.

and you dont think there could be an equally as evil group of people that make shit up so they can make cash from natural paranoia..

Show me a conspiracy site that isnt selling a book... :2 cents:

Where is that bulgarian guy to agree with this nut?

Theres the answer lol

I am guessing that because of the massive cock it has drained all the blood from your brain . . . . or else you are just an idiot.

Now I'm NOT saying that this explains how the aircraft were "replaced" on 9/11 (I'm still gonna need a hell of a lot more evidence to convince me the entire thing was orchestrated by the "Illuminati"), but it is possible for large passenger jets to be stolen apparently without a trace:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/3003058.stm

Put down the Dan Brown novels. Thanks.

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

If you can take what I wrote and twist it into what you just said, then your mind is more dangerous than you may think!

I can point you to dozens upon dozen of websites and documentaries that point of 100's of problems with the official story thank you very much.
Here is one. http://www.letsroll911.org/

It would take me literally days to write out what happended.

If anyone was do to any legit investigation they would see that the official story is falling apart at its seams. If you dont investigate yourself then you are at the mercy of...mmmm brainwash.

u just completely reinforced my 3 key fallacies of all conspiracy elitist's arguments.
:thumbsup

Did you know the United States of America went bankrupt in 1933.
Did you know it was taken over by a corporation.
The Corporation Changed the name to United States.
United States is now a company in recievership to the creditor.
The President of the United States is the President of a bankrupt Corporation called United States. As a U.S Citizen you are an employee of the United States Corp, head office is in District of Columbia.

Guess who owns the United states?
The Queen
The Vatican
The IMF.
Take your pic.... Maybe someone else... time to do your research!

isnt that the federal reserve ?? or something like that? I read something about that

i still cant tell what the fuss is about , looks like a plane pretty clearly to me..


http://www.fourwinds10.com/news/05-g...-animation.gif

MassiveCock: Although I found most of these theories interesting...you really accept them as the ultimate truth...just like a conservative republican on the right would accept what fox news tell them....

there are 2 extremes, you are one of them LOL

thats one of those david copperfield illusions, you are sheep :1orglaugh

I want to know about building 7

http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/wtc7.html

BREAKING NEWS: BatBoy found in cave!

http://www.weeklyworldnews.com/imgs/...s_batboy_2.jpg

I personally believe very little the U.S. Gov't says. If anyone has been paying attention over the years, you'll notice all the lies, but what they do is wait until the controversy has subdued, then say "Ya, we lied about that, sorry". And the only reason they fess up to it is if it gets exposed, just imagine the things that they have still gotten away with.

Just look at the so-called Patriot Act... now what's in the news today? Seems the U.S. Gov't was illegally "eavesdropping" on people.

War on Iraq - "Oh, ya, that info was faulty, sorry, but we're there now so we might as well stay for a bit"

From 1932 - 1972 U.S. Gov't Secretly uses 600 black men to study syphilis. Telling them is was to study "bad blood", they didn't treat them for the syphilis, rather studied the effects of it, telling them they were being treated. What was supposed to only last 6 months went for 40 years and only stopped due to the New York Times exposing the project.

I absolutely and 100% do not trust the U.S. Gov't at all. I wouldn't put anything past them, they are the most corrupt group of people in the World.

what's the 2nd 3rd and 4th most corrupt groups of people in the world on your list?

Russian Mafia
North Korean Gov't
Chinese Gov't

you've forgot african countries...

I never said I accept them as the ultimate truth ever!
Most of them contain more truth than any offical explaination.
But I can never know anything in absolute.

That video was actually on a conspiracy site as proof that the plane shot a missile at the wtc before it hit.. although i cant see that either.. looks like exactly what it was.

Its an image of a plane... question is ...Is it flight 157?

Someone tin hatted this shit already or I would. :helpme

fair enough...

I just think that the extreme left is just as bad as the extreme right... :upsidedow

those would not make any legit top 100 list of most corrupt groups

that was not the point of your original post-

Well, since he asked me what were on MY list, that's what you get...

I think they put the real passengers into a Hypercube and then filmed the (often hillarious) results.

http://www.lsi.sk/sergej/archiv/tv/cube2/kocka21.jpg

im pretty sure if it was planned whoever it is that orchestrated it wouldn't be dumb enough to not use the correct type of plane to crash into the 2nd tower when 100's of cameras are filming the already damaged tower 1

common sense

I completely agree.... Any extreme is pretty much extreme in my view.

Actually what you posted is 100% true except it isn't !

The corp is the federal reserve not the country USA.

The owners are Int'l banks:

1. Rothschild Banks of London & Berlin
2. Lehman Bros. Bank of N.Y.
3. Lazard Bros. Banks of Paris
4. Kuhn, Loeb Bank of N.Y.
5. Israel Moses Sief Banks of Italy
6. Chase Manhattan Bank of N.Y.
7. Warburg Bank of Hamburg & Amsterdam
8. Goldman, Sachs Bank of N.Y.

** There are several EO's which are documents that a President signs and every President re-signs them after they take office incase they of a national emergency.

The flap about Bush on spying on people after 9/11 is a good example. It's not illegal
at all and is within the powers of the President. Clinton signed the same EO's but they weren't acted on.

What's the "kill" card in all this is if the President or Fed gets out of hand the congress can amend the 14th amendment and erase 180 years of EO's and precedent.

The point of my original post was quoted from other sources...

My addition was the second question I posted.