Man Of the year...
 

The list of nominee's for this years Man of the year is rather frightening.
However on the actual list it is missing the following 3 men.

Arial Sharon - The Peace movement to follow the road map to peace with Palestine, overthrowing the labor party and creating a new one.

Saddam Hussien - His efforts to maintain Iraq as a Soverign Nation, survive US Bombings and ultimate invasion, eluding capture for months and ultimatly still attest that his leadership was for the better of Iraq. Which I believe.

NOTE: The USA is responsible for more Iraqi deaths than Saddam ever could have done himself.

Bin Laden - Lets face it, this cave dweller not only blew up two buildings in the heart of America that were central to its banking system but he lives to tell the tale to this day while avoiding one of the most technogically sophisticated military forces in the world while raising one of the most fierce terrorist organizations in modern civilization and possible history.


http://www.time.com/time/personofthe...x.html?cnn=yes

Is there a woman of the year or does that fall under this?

Condoleezza Rice and Valorie Plame is on the actual list, so they must be trannies. I knew it!

GQ's woman of the year is Jennifer Aniston.

I'd pick Saddam Hussein

Not many people actually know this but Donald Rumsfield was at the Gas site when Chemical Ali hit the kurds with mustard gas. American weapons of mass destruction killing Iraqi's in the early 80's.

Hussein was not there. Rumsfield was.

It is actually person or persons of the year.

Orly??

Oh my! :1orglaugh

Still, I could say it's the president himself..

Man of the Year: Condolessa Rice!

:1orglaugh No contest on this one..

Excellent!

I should Be on that List..

If Time makes anyone/thing other than Mother Nautre man of the year this year it is time to stop naming them.

The way ya been pickin the winners lately it oughtah be a consideration for sure!

Mother Nature

Speaks volumes about you and ignorance...now doesn't it?

"American weapons of mass destruction" have never killed a single Iraqi...or anyone else since the use of the A bomb during the Second World War. No need to thank me for educating you.

Certainly does.
The ignorant think Iraq is better in American hands and power.

Hussein knew how to lead that country and without em Iraq would now be Iran.

and Kuwait would be?

Rummy and Saddam
http://www.commondreams.org/views02/0802-01.htm

American supplies Circa 1983:

For the next five years, Washington would quietly ensure that Saddam received all the military equipment he needed to stave off defeat, even precursor chemicals that could be used against Iranian soldiers and Kurdish civilians. Not that Washington supported the use of chemical weapons, particularly against civilians. It was more that the Reagan administration was very reluctant to condemn their use by Iraq back then.
http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/EL17Ak01.html

So what was that ya blathering about Mr King?

Kuwait.

The Kuwait war started when Kuwait began tilting there drills into Iraqi Oil fields.

Basically they were stealing oil.

The only US military equipment sold to Iraq...ever...was some rotary wing aircraft (not gunships)...the indirect sale of some cluster bombs...and possibly a few howitzers...end of story. Every one knows that private enterprise was allowed...for a period of time...to sell dual use materials to Iraq. Zero WMD's were ever sold to Iraq by the US. The US did provide Iraq with some intel during the Iraq/Iran war...but the US also provided Iran with intel during the Iraq/Iran war.

A 1994 congressional inquiry also found that dozens of biological agents, including various strains of anthrax, had been shipped to Iraq by US companies, under licence from the commerce department.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story...866942,00.html

The ignorant think that Iraq is in the hands and power of America. Iraq is a sovereign nation with its own developing constitution and soon to be a permanent democratically elected government in lieu of the temporary one. The US is assisting in stablizing this developing government. Once again...there is not any need to thank me for educating you.

TheKing...
Ya got owned pack it up and leave the building.

Just remember Dow Jones...

http://www.dow.com/images/global/dow_header_logo.gif

baddog looks like Saddam Hussein in that pic. LoL

Old news and is known by everyone that keeps themselves informed. Biological agents are dual use materials. Biological agents are not WMD's. Biological agents must be specially processed to ever be weaponized.

Me ... I have a mirror with the frame that says like "Times Man of the Year" ... with my face right in the middle of the red frame when I look at it !

I voted for the google guys

Furthermore, in 1988, the Dow Chemical company sold $1.5m-worth (£930,000) of pesticides to Iraq despite suspicions they would be used for chemical warfare.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story...866942,00.html


Quit whinning King.
Ya got owned.

Here King...

http://www.dow.com/commitments/contact/index.htm

Ask them what they were thinking selling such things to Iraq or any other country in the world. American Morality is in the shitter.

Once again...dual use material...and must be processed to be weaponized. It has been common knowledge for many many years that private enterprise was allowed...for a period of time...to sell dual use materials to Iraq. Not one single WMD was ever sold to Iraq by the US...as you and others like to state over and over. The US did not arm Iraq...as you and others like to state over and over.

Regardless.

Saddam got the job done for Iraqi's at all costs.
Thats a fucken leader.

Not a leadership like America's where the administration has ties, negotiations and helped Saddam throughout his time as leader of Iraq. Declaring a false war and gauging America's people in the process, killing more folks than Saddam ever dreamed of.

In an analogy
if the whole event was a poker table of players it would be like a bunch friends playing cards and suddenly one of em stands up and stabs another in the back for his chips.

And under the pretense that the chemicals "Could be" weaponised...

Please. Are Americans that fucken stupid? Really. The "materials" we made knowing what these chemicals can be made to do and sold them to Iraq and guess what happens a few months later? Magically Chemical weapons used in a war.

Now skirt and play dumb, but was that just a coincidence to you?
Ya do not sell WMD capable materials to a desperate man loosing a war.
Duh...

So Person of the year...

Saddam Has it.
Excellent!

saddam murdered his own daughters husband over a simple disagreement. this isn't "man of the year" material.

plus, didn't you know? stirring board controversy is so 2003. i received the post-it, it's on my monitor right now... didn't you get it? you musn't be in the know :(

hahahah.. funny... he's a murderer.. :)

Ahh yeah, the Americanized view.
I forget that alot of folks do not do thier own searching to draw thier own conclusions.

On January 2, 1939, Time Magazine published its annual Man of the Year issue. For the year 1938, Time had chosen Adolf Hitler as the man who "for better or worse" (as Time founder Henry Luce expressed it) had most influenced events of the preceding year.

http://www.scrapbookpages.com/Dachau...TimeCover.html