US 'uses incendiary arms' in Iraq --
 

Italian state TV, Rai, has broadcast a documentary accusing the US military of using white phosphorus bombs against civilians in the Iraqi city of Falluja.

Read the whole article here
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/4417024.stm

WTF is wrong with America???

They shouldn't complain, we gave them freedom and democracy :thumbsup

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

omg here we go again :1orglaugh

Can I log into your simple simon fake nick?

I liked that character :)

Here's yesterdays thread:

"So its true! Chemical Weapons were used in Iraq ( pics )"
http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showthread.php?t=537648

I wouldn't put it past the US military.. However I'd like to see proof of it other than just some documentary says so. Let's see the proof that the documentary is using.

I do think it smells more like a anti US documentry rather than anything else.

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

Since when PROOF is required ????? :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

I know of countries going to war without it, no problem :2 cents:

the actual documentary in english

but IT MUST be fake :1orglaugh

Thanks for the link watching it now..

that site has a lot of good stuff on it..

one of my fav's is this one..

http://www.informationclearinghouse....rticle3995.htm

I just got done watching the Video. I am still shuttering.

as explained in the other thread, chemical weapons leave residue . Residue is easily identifiable, you go to where it happened , you take residue scrapings, you have it analyzed and you say " here's tetroneurolon residue " , "no other way it could have gotten here but chemical weapons "

The fact that they did this documentary ( propoganda ) without any evidence but ( third party hearsay ) sounds very very fishy..

The video was done well, but IMO still doesn't put up proof positive that it was used. Brings up a lot of speculation on the subject but there is no real smoking gun. Most of the carnage in the video IMO was used to create hate twords what is going on in the US lead war and not to prove their case.

So IMO the video really doesn't prove anything but does raise questions that should be answered. I personally wouldn't put it past our govt to use it and I'm sure they probably did, after all this is the same govt that doesn't see anything wrong with using Depleted Uranium shells.

I think this documentry was the same people that produced Hidden Wars of Desert Storm which was about the use of DU and it's effects after the first Gulf War.

now i am not saying that it is immpossible. shit, i could even see it as plausible. but like smokey said, i want some real evidence about this.

fuck off you stupid c u n t.
i did not bomb anyone.

So youre in the Military eh? kewl. Unit? I have family and friends in Iraq right now. I am glad you have internet access. Most of our friends can't get to a computer.. I am happy for you.. If youre infantry yeah you probably didn't bomb anybody, most of our friends are Comsat and Marines

In the Video it shows a letter from the Secretary of Defence stating "We did not use Napalm (sp?) instead we used MK 77". Whats funny I looked up MK 77 online, thats like the same stuff

http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/dumb/mk77.htm

In 25 years. like for Vietnam:

You are not entitled to know off or see that now.

i am in the military? stop trying to prove yourself to be retarded... we get it. you are. we are ok with it.

what the fuck do i care what happened? your closing remark was "what the fuck is wrong with america" - so FUCK YOU... about 30% or less of the population support the war or Bush in case you are too stupid to see the whole picture... and what weapons a military planning group decided to use on a mission one morning has nothing to do with "America".