?? Affiliates using only non-nude content of 18 + models
 

Bloggers and the like, how much is too much ?

"lascivious exhibition of the genitals or pubic area" is obviously out

Are you willing to risk topless? Hand bra's ? or what?

uhh why would anything be too much if theyre 18+?

The law you quoted only applies to photos of minors.

He probably was talking about 18-

having a lot of requests for non nude promo.. I am assuming to avoid 2257 hassles.

I know i'm overly cautious and paranoid, but I don't even want to have the compliance conversation in the first place. I don't want them to even get so far as to wonder if i have documentation.

As I understand it, the 2257 laws apply to sexually explicit content. If the girls are 18+, you still have to have documentation to verify that, and you are subject to having the audit take place. Given the crap over Janet Jackson, I wouldn't be surprised if that includes exposed boobs.

THEREFORE: I am looking for suggestive and 'teasing' totally non-nude promo content so that they won't even bother with me in the first place.

Am I dillusional? Will totally non-nude content still require IDs and records?

Teasing will sell better than giving away "free milk" in my humble opinion.

so would this be pushing it for those like gorny?

http://www.tvtscams.com/05.jpg

what about fully topless etc..

On my blogs I post them with tits showing sometimes only...no full on nude or hardcore porn

congrats on the 1k

would you post this?

http://www.tvtscams.com/03.jpg

Its not about what they wear or not wear. Its about what they are doing - actual or "simulated". Mere nudity is excempt!

That's what I thought too, but some don't want to go even that far I guess.

The girl on the indexpage of privatefeeds.com is yawning :2 cents:

You want docs for that?

This one is over the top for me because the ass and puss are poised and visible and "waiting for it"... the see-through top I think would be okay - its not in an explicitly sexual situation and technically its not nude.

The fucking government has made a pussy out of me. :(

better safe than sorry, and you're right tease sells better...with cams anyway.

http://www.tvtscams.com/04.jpg




Couldn't resist, I love this girl.

She is a hottie.... yum yum.

I think we need to see some more pics :pimp

I like this thread because I am a paranoid dude too. Plus, I want to put some softcore samples up. Now, I have heard that you still might need docs. if the pic if from a hardcore set. Anyone know the answer to that one. Now, things are changing that you might need docs. on SIMULATED sexual activities. Who knows. I want to add samples but I am trying to be compliant.

Well it's all pure speculation still I believe.

You can take a look at this if you're so inclined:

http://www.livebucks.com/doc/2257review.pdf

It's our lawyers "opinion" on the matter...enough said. Not totally the same issue but enough crossover to be relevant I think.

More pics you say? I'm running out of "non nude" ...

http://www.tvtscams.com/assfinger.jpg

Remember, it isn't just a single picture, but can be a question of the set of images. If the photoshoot required documentation (because the girl got naked) then each image in that set coudl be subject to 2257 as a "work" or as a single session.

trying to dodge an elephant is a really good way to get hit with the left leg instead of the right... but you still end up flat fucked.

Alex

I've never heard that saying before, I'll have to remember it.

everybody is hitting 1k in this thread

how about www.wildwestbabes.com ?

there are plenty of non-nude model shots to choose from. ICQ me if you want more than what the site has on it now.

We have NN hosted gallys at http://www.CityStyleCreations.com :)