Rhetorical question, is this fishy or not?
 

Lets say theres this guy that runs a cam site. Two of his best and most reliable girls come to him and inform him that they are owed money by a fairly major program.


Girl A: Is owed a couple hundred for shows and $1300 for an affiliate payout. When she inquired when shed be getting those overdue checks, her accounts (host and affiliate) were closed due to some unspecified "fraudulent" activity. She's told that she won't be getting her money, but no details of what "fraud" she committed were given to her.


Girl B: When she asks when HER overdue check for $270 will arrive, she's given a nonexistant fed-Ex tracking number.



Discuss.

My cock is gargantuan.

DISCUSS.

Don' tell us what to discuss. I'm not that ironic

Sounds pretty goddamned fishy. But there are always 3 sides to every story. Yours, theirs, and the truth. But indeed it does sound fishy.

damn clickcash :Oh crap

Then dont post fuckstain.







Indeed, and that's why I'm not naming names... Yet.

Did you mean hypothetical question?

Why the hate?

Seems really fishy. Sounds like someone is fucking chat hosts.

Word to the wise, don't launch affiliate programs you can't make the payouts for.

I think he did

I meant what I said.


"a rhetorical question is one asked solely to produce an effect (especially to make an assertion) rather than to elicit a reply"

And it produced and effect in me, and then you hated me for it.

But I still love you. :thumbsup

LOL I love you too.