Strange experiences with Richards Realm
 

Over the past days I got a high number of refused galleries from Richards Realm. In general I understand when I get a denial, but over the past days it's not clear to me. Do they once again have a new reviewer that is much too anal about things?

Some examples:

"Poor quality full-size images." while there's nothing real fuzzy in the pics
(yeah, they are video screen caps and no mega sharp high quality glamour stills, but isn't that what at least half of the Internet porn is made of?):
http://www.pornpicz.com/tgps/051030a/index.html
http://www.pornpicz.com/tgps/051030b/index.html

Can someone please clear this up for me?

E.J.

if i remember richard will also refuse galleries that don't have enough nudity, just go to play by his rules

Qulity of the full sized image is not good as you said by yourself, because
It is screen caps which normally get denied.

the answer is in your remark

The strange thing is: sometimes they are accepted, sometimes not at all. And then I am talking about the same series of pics.

And if I ask David from RR to clear things up for me, he has no clue why the reviewer refused the pics and post them anyway...

There isn't real 100% uniformity.
I guess the reviewer didn't get laid this weekend that causes him to be very very strict on what is accepted these past 2 or 3 days... :winkwink:

Richards Realm is generally refusing a lot nowdays, beside you pay.

If there isn't a real fresh gallery shortage it's very unlikely that a TGP owner will list screenshot galleries.