GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Hypothesis: Women's ass sizes determines racial average for penis size (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=532885)

graphical x 10-26-2005 08:46 PM

Hypothesis: Women's ass sizes determines racial average for penis size
 
Premise: doggie style is probably the most 'primal' and 'basic' hence earliest sexual position in human history

Premise: reaching the cervix requires a longer penis lengtht--although sperm 'swims' to the egg in the fallopian tubes, conception is aided by the proximity afforded by a longer penis.

Premise: the thicker the ass, the longer the required penis length


Conclusion: due to genetic selection, populations where the female's ass are flat on the average, the male penis is, on average, shorter.

Proof: Asian populations and African populations (thick booty= huge penises, on the average)

Discuss. I am not complete sure re the accuracy of the premises (and hence the conclusion) but let's discuss it.

pr0 10-26-2005 08:47 PM

i think you should invest in a gun & shoot yourself

graphical x 10-26-2005 08:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pr0
i think you should invest in a gun & shoot yourself

I'm sure your plea for help due to repressed rage at your imbecilic intellect might be amusing to some people. However, I find it excruciatingly boring.

Pleasurepays 10-26-2005 08:50 PM

africans are fat? asians are fat?

do you go through life with your eyes open?

pornguy 10-26-2005 08:50 PM

It is an interesting thought.

LauraLee 10-26-2005 08:52 PM

I have to say, i find your hypothesis interesting. Funny thing is, to some degree it kinda makes sense!

Screaming 10-26-2005 08:54 PM

reading way to far into it for me heh

pr0 10-26-2005 08:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by graphical x
I'm sure your plea for help due to repressed rage at your imbecilic intellect might be amusing to some people. However, I find it excruciatingly boring.


imbecilic intellect :1orglaugh

graphical x 10-26-2005 08:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pleasurepays
africans are fat? asians are fat?

do you go through life with your eyes open?

Asians and Africans (specially western African stock--the base of African American populations) have differing morphologies (on average) that would support this hypothesis (I don't dare call it a theory cuz really, its just a guess and intellectual speculation)

Asian men, on the average, have small penises. The reverse is true of African-American/African/Arab men. Now cross reference this with the relative ASS SIZES of the females of their respective populations...

If the numbers bear this out, this is yet another example of how sex SCULPTS morphology. Because of sexual selection, males and females influence each other's looks. No different from how female proboscis monkeys only want to fuck males with huge noses or pea hens want males with bright and huge heavy plumage.

Pleasurepays 10-26-2005 09:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by graphical x
Asians and Africans (specially western African stock--the base of African American populations) have differing morphologies (on average) that would support this hypothesis (I don't dare call it a theory cuz really, its just a guess and intellectual speculation)

Asian men, on the average, have small penises. The reverse is true of African-American/African/Arab men. Now cross reference this with the relative ASS SIZES of the females of their respective populations...

If the numbers bear this out, this is yet another example of how sex SCULPTS morphology. Because of sexual selection, males and females influence each other's looks. No different from how female proboscis monkeys only want to fuck males with huge noses or pea hens want males with bright and huge heavy plumage.

how old are you? 10? you are making a case for connecting evolution and penis size based on looney assumptions and guesses which are only supported by stereotypes?

graphical x 10-26-2005 09:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pleasurepays
how old are you? 10? you are making a case for connecting evolution and penis size based on looney assumptions and guesses which are only supported by stereotypes?

Judging by your ad hominem attacks and refusal to open your mind, it makes me think that you're the prepubescent here. :1orglaugh

Odin 10-26-2005 09:20 PM

West-African's are bigger in general - including ass (especially compared to Asian's). So it leaves us with the question:

What came first? The big ass, or the big dick?

Pleasurepays 10-26-2005 09:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by graphical x
Judging by your ad hominem attacks and refusal to open your mind, it makes me think that you're the prepubescent here. :1orglaugh

having a word a day dictionary on your desk is not going to make you look any more intelligent after posting something so stupid.

TeddyRacer1 10-26-2005 09:24 PM

Not all black guys are well endowed, talk to any black girl you will know that,..... conclusion.

poorwebmaster 10-26-2005 09:28 PM

http://www.filecabin.com/uploads/112...hafucka4gs.jpg

graphical x 10-26-2005 09:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief
West-African's are bigger in general - including ass (especially compared to Asian's). So it leaves us with the question:

What came first? The big ass, or the big dick?

Sexual selection... kinda like asking what came first... the peahen or the male peacock's bright big tail....

graphical x 10-26-2005 09:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TeddyRacer1
Not all black guys are well endowed, talk to any black girl you will know that,..... conclusion.

That's why I mentioned the word 'average' quite a few times

SmokeyTheBear 10-26-2005 09:34 PM

sheesh alot of uptight people in here ..

I think the theory is completely plausible

graphical x 10-26-2005 09:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pleasurepays
having a word a day dictionary on your desk is not going to make you look any more intelligent after posting something so stupid.

If it's so stupid, attack it premise by premise. Attack its logic. But no... you choose the intellectually lazy route and attack me personally. That isn't arguing. That isn't addressing the merits of my argument.

Titan 10-26-2005 09:35 PM

I would say that this isn't completely far fetched. A large woman would have large hips, a large ass, and therefore probably a large vagina. You need a big cock to pleasure a big pussy. But averages are basically irrelevant as there is always large variation.

SmokeyTheBear 10-26-2005 09:35 PM

my only worry is....

my gf has a small ass , so will my penis begin to shrink because of its unneeded length :)

graphical x 10-26-2005 09:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SmokeyTheBear
my only worry is....

my gf has a small ass , do will my penis begin to shrink because of its unneeded length :)

No worries. The processes mentioned above takes hundreds of years and demographic isolation (probably in the form of continental isolation) to fully produce statistically identifiable patterns.

nofx 10-26-2005 09:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SmokeyTheBear
my only worry is....

my gf has a small ass , so will my penis begin to shrink because of its unneeded length :)


LOLOLROFLROFLOLOL

oh noes, i hope it doesnt work like that

SmokeyTheBear 10-26-2005 09:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by graphical x
No worries. The processes mentioned above takes hundreds of years and demographic isolation (probably in the form of continental isolation) to fully produce statistically identifiable patterns.

maybe if we started paddig our wives asses ( thus tricking the penis into thinking its got further to go ), eventually our offspring will have bigger wieners..

BV 10-26-2005 09:47 PM

I wonder if this relates to why you see a little scrawny dudes with a big ass women and little scrawny women with big fat dudes.

Quote:

Originally Posted by graphical x
Premise: doggie style is probably the most 'primal' and 'basic' hence earliest sexual position in human history

Premise: reaching the cervix requires a longer penis lengtht--although sperm 'swims' to the egg in the fallopian tubes, conception is aided by the proximity afforded by a longer penis.

Premise: the thicker the ass, the longer the required penis length


Conclusion: due to genetic selection, populations where the female's ass are flat on the average, the male penis is, on average, shorter.

Proof: Asian populations and African populations (thick booty= huge penises, on the average)

Discuss. I am not complete sure re the accuracy of the premises (and hence the conclusion) but let's discuss it.


Pleasurepays 10-26-2005 09:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by graphical x
If it's so stupid, attack it premise by premise. Attack its logic. But no... you choose the intellectually lazy route and attack me personally. That isn't arguing. That isn't addressing the merits of my argument.

attack what? you can't post simple evidence that supports the idea that any of your assumptions have merit. a "hypothesis" is an educated guess... not an ignorant shot in the dark.

where is evidence that connects penis length to ethinicity? where is evidence that connects penis length to average body fat % of femals and fat distribution? where is evidence to suggest that any of your assumptions about Africans, Arabs, Asians etc even have any merit at all? Did you do an Arab cock and ass study?

significant evelutionary and physiological changes do not happen in a few generations which is basically what you are suggesting. in fact if it could, you could also point to other evolutionary changes that occured... so how else has the human body evolved in the last 1000 years? 2000 years? answers? no? didn't think so.

graphical x 10-26-2005 10:00 PM

Now, that's more like it. Instead of just attacking the speaker.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pleasurepays
attack what? you can't post simple evidence that supports the idea that any of your assumptions have merit. a "hypothesis" is an educated guess... not an ignorant shot in the dark.

where is evidence that connects penis length to ethinicity? where is evidence that connects penis length to average body fat % of femals and fat distribution? where is evidence to suggest that any of your assumptions about Africans, Arabs, Asians etc even have any merit at all? Did you do an Arab cock and ass study?

significant evelutionary and physiological changes do not happen in a few generations which is basically what you are suggesting. in fact if it could, you could also point to other evolutionary changes that occured... so how else has the human body evolved in the last 1000 years? 2000 years? answers? no? didn't think so.


latinasojourn 10-26-2005 10:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by graphical x
No worries. The processes mentioned above takes hundreds of years and demographic isolation (probably in the form of continental isolation) to fully produce statistically identifiable patterns.

well, more like thousands of years.

but an interesting hypothesis, and plausible.

in evolution there is a REASON for everything, and there are probably 100's of factors re: big asses and big dicks.

SleazyDream 10-26-2005 10:40 PM

i find it funny how some topics discussed purly on a statistical basis are off limits

Pornwolf 10-26-2005 10:44 PM

Some things are just too obvious to argue against. This is one of them.

BTW, I love big round asses. Gimmie Aria Giovanni over Kylie Minogue anyday.

PixeLs 10-26-2005 11:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pornwolf
Some things are just too obvious to argue against. This is one of them.

BTW, I love big round asses. Gimmie Aria Giovanni over Kylie Minogue anyday.

...and how come you forgot Jessica Beil and Jlo man?!

baddog 10-26-2005 11:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pr0
i think you should invest in a gun & shoot yourself


I don't know, he may be on to something here.

baddog 10-26-2005 11:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LauraLee
I have to say, i find your hypothesis interesting. Funny thing is, to some degree it kinda makes sense!

Yeah, makes me wonder if he read it somewhere rather than came up with it himself

AlienQ - BANNED FOR LIFE 10-26-2005 11:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by graphical x
I'm sure your plea for help due to repressed rage at your imbecilic intellect might be amusing to some people. However, I find it excruciatingly boring.


Noice:) :1orglaugh

baddog 10-26-2005 11:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by poorwebmaster


dumbass. Your "brains" do you use "it?" Wouldn't it be "them" if plural?

emthree 10-26-2005 11:31 PM

I hear fat chicks have tight pussies. Big on the outside, tight on the inside.
Not trying to find out for myself. GFY BBWs care to comment?

Lev 10-27-2005 01:07 AM

never thought of it like that, good theory indeed :)

DatingGold 10-27-2005 01:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by graphical x
Premise: doggie style is probably the most 'primal' and 'basic' hence earliest sexual position in human history

Premise: reaching the cervix requires a longer penis lengtht--although sperm 'swims' to the egg in the fallopian tubes, conception is aided by the proximity afforded by a longer penis.

Premise: the thicker the ass, the longer the required penis length


Conclusion: due to genetic selection, populations where the female's ass are flat on the average, the male penis is, on average, shorter.

Proof: Asian populations and African populations (thick booty= huge penises, on the average)

Discuss. I am not complete sure re the accuracy of the premises (and hence the conclusion) but let's discuss it.

you ever seen an ehtiopian? explain that :1orglaugh

BlueWire 10-27-2005 01:21 AM

Entertaining as always to say the least :thumbsup

graphical x 10-27-2005 01:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlueWire
Entertaining as always to say the least :thumbsup

Entertainment arising from a little intellectual curiosity... is enough for me :) These types of topics sure are a change of pace from the endless cycle of drama or "would you hit it" threads

graphical x 10-27-2005 01:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog
Yeah, makes me wonder if he read it somewhere rather than came up with it himself

I just applied the readily observable theory of sexual selection (males and females selection of partners 'sculpt' each other's morphologies) with racial difference. I don't think I'm the first that came up with this idea. If I was, I'd have written a paper about it, replete with some statistical backing as requested by GFY pleasurepays (see above) and submitted it to peer review. But I'm not in academia, just a regular joe who makes his money off the net and likes to mix and match biometry/biological theories with whatever fancies me...from site clicking behavior to crossracial ass size differencesd. :1orglaugh

Pleasurepays 10-27-2005 02:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by graphical x
I just applied the readily observable theory of sexual selection (males and females selection of partners 'sculpt' each other's morphologies) with racial difference. I don't think I'm the first that came up with this idea. If I was, I'd have written a paper about it, replete with some statistical backing as requested by GFY pleasurepays (see above) and submitted it to peer review. But I'm not in academia, just a regular joe who makes his money off the net and likes to mix and match biometry/biological theories with whatever fancies me...from site clicking behavior to crossracial ass size differencesd. :1orglaugh


are you brain damaged? or just competing for the "Shittiest Scientist with the Biggest Vocabulary Award"

you said:

"Proof: Asian populations and African populations (thick booty= huge penises, on the average)"

is that "proof" or just a bizarre and irrational assumption on your part?

you later said:
"Asian men, on the average, have small penises. The reverse is true of African-American/African/Arab men"

Do you really know about African dicks? Arab dicks? Or is that just another irrational assumption stated as fact?

aparently your cognitive abilities have yet to catch up to your vocabulary... being the brainiac that you are, you should know that those are different areas of the brain and your post might very well be indicative of some brain damage. your parents might be able to fill you in there.

Gunni 10-27-2005 02:33 AM

Black women don't all have big asses, in America I've seen equal ammounts of white and black women with huge asses, in Africa I didn't see that many women with big asses, mostly just mature women had them actually. As women tend to get married quite young in Africa while they are still skinny little things I doubt this theory has any value

chodadog 10-27-2005 02:37 AM

Here's a crazy idea. Generally, Black people are taller than Asian people. This means they generally have bigger hands, feet, legs, arms.. and woah, penises? Incredible.

graphical x 10-27-2005 03:15 AM

You really can't argue without getting all emotional, can you? Your whining is getting quite old. Even though you ask some good questions, the pettiness of your ad hominems is getting quite tiring.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pleasurepays
ZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz


graphical x 10-27-2005 03:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chodadog
Here's a crazy idea. Generally, Black people are taller than Asian people. This means they generally have bigger hands, feet, legs, arms.. and woah, penises? Incredible.

Good observation. Definitely a counterargument to the hypothesis.

bhutocracy 10-27-2005 03:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by graphical x
If it's so stupid, attack it premise by premise. Attack its logic. But no... you choose the intellectually lazy route and attack me personally. That isn't arguing. That isn't addressing the merits of my argument.

Well it's stupid because you are basing your assumption on rap music videos. You honestly think click-click-dirk out in africa has a big ass?
If you still don't get it, 400 years isn't enough to mean anything evolution wise in this particular case. It's also very much a myth that African men have bigger cocks in the first place so it's all a moot point.. Silly white men were just trying to keep the brothers down by animalising them by talking about their "animal lust and genitals" as a way of degrading them and keeping fear and distrust rampant.

There are a bunch of studies but for eg the first result on google for penis size race: "It's also worth pointing out that there is no correlation between penile size and race. "
and so on.. theres is no real difference, and any observations are easily explained by the mythology.. ie no black man can now answer a questionnaire without having to fudge to measure up to it... you're never going to see an average sized black male in a porno.. whats the point. etc etc.

tristan_D 10-27-2005 03:57 AM

so many inaccuracies there, well as far as experiences are telling me.

Pleasurepays 10-27-2005 11:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by graphical x
You really can't argue without getting all emotional, can you? Your whining is getting quite old. Even though you ask some good questions, the pettiness of your ad hominems is getting quite tiring.

i am far from emotional. your comments are nothing more than an attempt to direct attention away from valid points that were made, which you cannot address without looking even more rediculous.

its actually entertaining to watch you post, i have never seen someone try so hard to mask thier own ignorance by using a thesaurus and dictionary while they post.

as for "arguing" - uhm... your at a place called "Go Fuck Yourself" dipshit.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:27 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123