Galleries that plant cookies = okay
 

TGP/MGP owners, are galleries that plant cookies okay?

ok, but they aren't going to grow unless you have special "cookie water". I sale it very cheap.

but seriously.. i think its kind of cheap , if your just planting one cookie , i suppose its fair, bit have seen traffic reseller's planting hudreds of cookies for sites they aren't even listing.. i think it explains some people's lower ratio's on certain program formats..

ahh i need to buy some more of that cookie water please heh hahahahahah

All cookies need milk.

Not water.

http://www.ialien.com/cookies.jpg

I need to plant the cookie so I know which TGP sent the traffic so I can study conversion patterns

More feedback please

ccbill links plant them and i've never once heard of a tgp that didnt allow ccbill or any other processor because of "cookies".

It looks delicious, though it kinda burn.

Yes, but I was referring to planting small bits of info on users' browsers so we can track performance. As a TGP owner (presumably) would you have NO problem with that?

Once people realize TGP owners are not in business to make you money... you all will do much better. Some may allow cookies. Some may not. But I can assure you none care about your ability to track performance via cookies.

Are some owners loading a page that sets cookies for numerous sites/programs to snag the join?

Nope -- that would be unheard of...

I'm just giving you favor, that's just an honest opinion.

Are you bot?

I've seen that before... but it's not clear how that would work, I thought that most affiliate programs give credit to the last click not the first click?

I have seen a crazy TGP owner get really mad about getting a cookie from a gallery

Maybe 1/2 of the device would be a cookie, but you'd need another part to make that happen... kinda like a cookie version of Gator (scumware that swaps out ads masquerading as a password helper)