GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Max Hardcore raided today by FBI (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=524752)

DWB 10-05-2005 08:13 PM

Max Hardcore raided today by FBI
 
Sorry if this has been posted already today, I just found out.

click for story

DWB 10-05-2005 08:20 PM

I have a TON of piss content that will never see the light of day.

bigmack 10-05-2005 08:22 PM

How often do models lie about their age and get caught?

Doctor Dre 10-05-2005 08:29 PM

?Once again, the government is wasting tax dollars and otherwise invaluable law enforcement resources to try to force a minority view of morality on all of America. Five movies have been targeted by the Federal Prude Patrol. There is no indication of any crime to be alleged except obscenity. If indicted, I will fight to protect my liberty, as well as the liberty of consenting adults to watch other adults engage in lawful, consensual, pleasurable sexual action. Shame on the Bush Department of Justice. I am proud of the movies I make and proud of those who buy and sell those movies.?

Doctor Dre 10-05-2005 08:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bigmack
How often do models lie about their age and get caught?

has nothing to do with it ...

The Ghost 10-05-2005 11:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DirtyWhiteBoy
I have a TON of piss content that will never see the light of day.

Just don't make DVDs of it :)

Jace 10-05-2005 11:46 PM

they are fucking wasting their time...max is a captain of one of the tighest ships in porn...he makes sure everything he shoots is 100% legit, and the only way for a girl to get around that is to have a 100% legit fake ID

SunTzu 10-05-2005 11:58 PM

so it starts...

"Mischievous commentary began propagating around the water coolers at 601 Fourth St. NW and its satellites, where the FBI's second-largest field office concentrates on national security, high-technology crimes and public corruption.

The new squad will divert eight agents, a supervisor and assorted support staff to gather evidence against "manufacturers and purveyors" of pornography -- not the kind exploiting children, but the kind that depicts, and is marketed to, consenting adults.

"I guess this means we've won the war on terror," said one exasperated FBI agent, speaking on the condition of anonymity because poking fun at headquarters is not regarded as career-enhancing. "We must not need any more resources for espionage.""

Washington Post article

butterflybucks 10-06-2005 12:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DirtyWhiteBoy
I have a TON of piss content that will never see the light of day.

I can sell your DVDs in Europe

DWB 10-06-2005 12:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by butterflybucks
I can sell your DVDs in Europe

Really? It's not piss & sex... just girls pissing. Mostly ethnic girls.

BTW... you get my ICQ about the black girls in the USA due to the problem I had down south? My iCQ is acting crazy the past week and I'm not sure if you got it or not.

Hit me up when you get on. :thumbsup

Doctor Dre 10-06-2005 12:25 AM

You guys have seen the pool ? 92 % of people were agaisn't war on porn

Mr.Fiction 10-06-2005 02:17 AM

Republicans hate free speech. :1orglaugh

fetishblog 10-06-2005 02:22 AM

Fuck them. Get a good lawyer and live with it. As long as your ducks are in a row they have no case.

Turf 10-06-2005 02:35 AM

but is doesnt come as a surprise that they single out max.. his stuff is very boarderline when you look at the current govements views and the laws they pass..

fetishblog 10-06-2005 02:37 AM

I love Max. The federal prosecutor taking the case is female. She probably has fantasies about the stuff that Max does.

mkx 10-06-2005 02:38 AM

didn't they get busted over a year ago for the same thing?

Mr.Fiction 10-06-2005 06:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mkx
didn't they get busted over a year ago for the same thing?

There is a new more corrupt Supreme Court for the government to appeal to now.

gornyhuy 10-06-2005 06:19 AM

Not to mention a massively conservative and born again bench.

ChefJeff 10-06-2005 07:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr.Fiction
There is a new more corrupt Supreme Court for the government to appeal to now.

Yup, the Supreme Court is a fucking joke now.

Mr.Fiction 10-06-2005 08:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChefJeff
Yup, the Supreme Court is a fucking joke now.

Republicans are putting right wing political activists on the court instead of judges. Didn't they used to complain about "judicial activists? They've proven they want activist judges, just right wing activists. :1orglaugh

misturcrowley 10-06-2005 09:08 AM

Women Don't Find Max Offensive
 
When Max had his trial for obscenity it was a hung jury and they dropped the case (if I remember correctly.) The jury was half women and all the women voted AGAINST the obscenity charge. Have you seen the women on juries? Mostly middle aged women and senior citizens. It's the men who wanted him convicted. Go figure. I've heard of other cases similar. Any thoughts on why this is?

Mr.Fiction 10-06-2005 10:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by misturcrowley
When Max had his trial for obscenity it was a hung jury and they dropped the case (if I remember correctly.) The jury was half women and all the women voted AGAINST the obscenity charge. Have you seen the women on juries? Mostly middle aged women and senior citizens. It's the men who wanted him convicted. Go figure. I've heard of other cases similar. Any thoughts on why this is?

Maybe because angry white men are more likely to be Republican and many Republicans hate free speech? :1orglaugh

After Shock Media 10-06-2005 10:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by misturcrowley
When Max had his trial for obscenity it was a hung jury and they dropped the case (if I remember correctly.) The jury was half women and all the women voted AGAINST the obscenity charge. Have you seen the women on juries? Mostly middle aged women and senior citizens. It's the men who wanted him convicted. Go figure. I've heard of other cases similar. Any thoughts on why this is?

May want to check that again.
Last case was a technicality ruling.

misturcrowley 10-06-2005 11:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by After Shock Media
May want to check that again.
Last case was a technicality ruling.

from Wikipedia:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Max_Hardcore

The city of Los Angeles charged Hardcore with distribution of obscenity, but these charges were dismissed after a jury failed to reach a verdict. An additional obscenity charge was subsequently levied against him by L.A., again resulting in a hung jury. The government has since ceased prosecuting him. Hardcore commented that "it was a frivolous waste of public resources."

Snake Doctor 10-06-2005 11:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jace
they are fucking wasting their time...max is a captain of one of the tighest ships in porn...he makes sure everything he shoots is 100% legit, and the only way for a girl to get around that is to have a 100% legit fake ID

Duuuuuudddddeeeee!!!!
It's an OBSCENITY case, not a 2257 case.
Theoretically you can have an "obscene" video with two 90 year old people. It has nothing to do with age or minors, just straight up censorship.

Snake Doctor 10-06-2005 11:38 AM

All I can say about this is that I really hope he beats the case.

If Max Hardcore and Extreme associates can walk away from obscenity prosecutions unscathed, then the rest of us have nothing to worry about in regards to obscenity.

:2cents:

misturcrowley 10-06-2005 11:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by After Shock Media
May want to check that again.
Last case was a technicality ruling.

from avn.com:

http://www.adultvideonews.com/cover/cover0504_01.html

Douglas should know: He's the attorney for Max Hardcore, whose video Max Extreme 4 was tried before a Los Angeles jury as obscene in 2002, in part because one obviously adult actress claimed on the tape that she was 12, which the L.A. city attorney argued was enough for jurors to find that the tape violated community standards.
They didn't agree, though, and the trial ended in a hung jury reportedly split 6-6, with no retrial date in sight after more than 18 months. In the meantime, Hardcore's tapes continue to sell well - his current most popular line is Hardcore Schoolgirls - but Max is now more careful how his actresses are portrayed.

misturcrowley 10-06-2005 11:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lenny2
All I can say about this is that I really hope he beats the case.

If Max Hardcore and Extreme associates can walk away from obscenity prosecutions unscathed, then the rest of us have nothing to worry about in regards to obscenity.

:2cents:

Visa/Mastercard should cough up some change for Max's defense in the hopes that the industry stays healthy and keeps reaping them so much profit.....or better yet, how about ccbill!

After Shock Media 10-06-2005 11:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by misturcrowley
from avn.com:

http://www.adultvideonews.com/cover/cover0504_01.html

Douglas should know: He's the attorney for Max Hardcore, whose video Max Extreme 4 was tried before a Los Angeles jury as obscene in 2002, in part because one obviously adult actress claimed on the tape that she was 12, which the L.A. city attorney argued was enough for jurors to find that the tape violated community standards.
They didn't agree, though, and the trial ended in a hung jury reportedly split 6-6, with no retrial date in sight after more than 18 months. In the meantime, Hardcore's tapes continue to sell well - his current most popular line is Hardcore Schoolgirls - but Max is now more careful how his actresses are portrayed.

Yeah. Just spoke with EXP. It went to trial, hung jury like you said. Technicality was something else all together.

misturcrowley 10-06-2005 12:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by After Shock Media
Yeah. Just spoke with EXP. It went to trial, hung jury like you said. Technicality was something else all together.

It seems the most dangerous people are bible thumping MEN with closet porn addictions. They want to prove to everyone how pure they are.

I can't find it right now...but the LA Times article at the time stated that all six of the jurors who voted AGAINST the conviction were women. Maybe those old ladies understand pornography more than we thought.

Mr.Fiction 10-06-2005 05:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by misturcrowley
It seems the most dangerous people are bible thumping MEN with closet porn addictions. They want to prove to everyone how pure they are.

The far right are probably the biggest consumers of porn, even though they try to get it banned. :1orglaugh

smack 10-06-2005 05:39 PM

if you can't at least find "fists of fury" to be funny, your a sad, joyless person.

damn feds.

Mr.Fiction 10-07-2005 01:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by smack
if you can't at least find "fists of fury" to be funny, your a sad, joyless person.

damn feds.

The FBI probably doesn't want to do this, but the right wingers in the White House want to force their religion on all Americans.

More proof of how brainwashed GFY Bush supporters are. :1orglaugh

phatzaneŽ 10-09-2005 02:11 PM

waste of time! even though i dont watch nor agree with this type of content, im not going to hate cuz max is a major player and icon in the porn industry.... :thumbsup

Juicy D. Links 10-09-2005 02:17 PM

hi


-------------

BlueQuartz 10-09-2005 02:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Juicy D. Links
hi


-------------


66 thousands posts and each of them as pathetic as the last

V_RocKs 10-09-2005 02:44 PM

And in the mean time a serial killer is fucking a 10 year old girl and her 8 year old brother and will kill them both in a horrable way later on this week because of the 'lack of resources.'

Good job FBI...


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:37 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123